@tracegallagher I think it simply that she was at a Super Bowl, not one of her concerts, held in a different part of the country.

RT @Rothmus: 💯

@Unitedcajunnavy You do good work. Thank you.

Ok for those of us (me!) who had to look it up from Grok: An injunction bond is a type of surety bond that a court might require a plaintiff to post when seeking a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order. Here's a breakdown of its purpose and function: - **Purpose**: The primary purpose of an injunction bond is to protect the defendant against potential losses if it turns out that the injunction was wrongly granted. It serves as a financial guarantee that the plaintiff will compensate the defendant for any damages incurred due to the injunction if the court later determines that the injunction should not have been issued. - **How it Works**: - When a plaintiff requests an injunction, the court might require them to post a bond. This bond is essentially an insurance policy for the defendant, covering losses like lost profits, legal fees, or other damages that might occur if the injunction disrupts business or causes other harm. - If the plaintiff wins the case or if the injunction was justified, the bond isn't typically cashed out. However, if the injunction is found to have been improperly issued, the defendant can claim against the bond to recover damages. - **Legal Context**: - The requirement for an injunction bond is often statutory or based on court rules. The amount of the bond is usually set by the court and can vary based on the potential harm to the defendant if the injunction is granted. - **Risk for the Plaintiff**: - For the plaintiff, there's a financial risk involved. If they cannot secure the bond or if the bond amount is set too high, it might deter them from pursuing the injunction. Conversely, if they can post the bond, it shows a level of commitment to the case and confidence in their legal position. - **For the Defendant**: - It provides a layer of security knowing there's a financial recourse if they are wrongfully restrained or their rights are infringed upon by the injunction. Injunction bonds are common in various legal scenarios, particularly in business disputes where one party seeks to prevent another from taking certain actions (like selling assets or moving forward with a business plan) until a legal matter is resolved. They balance the scales by ensuring there's a mechanism for compensation if judicial power is misused.

@DeAngelisCorey Thank you, .@KenPaxtonTX

RT @brianeharrison: Every day the House is on vacation, priorities - like ENDING PROPERTY TAXES - risk failing. “Operation: Run Out The Cl…

@BeowulfsRevenge @DataRepublican @ChelseaClinton 😂 You’re not wrong

RT @RobertMSterling: I don’t want to connect my coffee machine to the wifi network. I don’t want to share the file with OneDrive. I don’t w…

@DefiyantlyFree Their document

@CollinRugg Was his family notified?

@pineapplepusher @DataRepublican @ChelseaClinton That doesn’t change my comment

RT @DOGE: Also today, the Department Of Education terminated 89 contracts worth $881mm. One contractor was paid $1.5mm to “observe mailin…

RT @brianeharrison: Yes, Texans… your taxes were spent on a government web portal to help students change their pronouns. Yes, your gover…

@atensnut No, I think we need to scrutinize both sides of the aisle. I’m sure Republicans are at fault, too. Call them if/when it happens.

@tpbreaking Karma

@matt_vanswol Great idea!

RT @GregAbbott_TX: Those complaining about Elon being unelected are hypocrites. They said nothing about unelected Fauci destroying our liv…

@DataRepublican @ChelseaClinton $57.5M in expenses? You can support a lot of people on that budget alone

RT @GuntherEagleman: Remember, there are 535 people in Congress and it took DOGE only 1 day to start exposing the corruption. Tell me aga…

@ScottPresler The GOP in the House and Senate better get their act together if they want to keep the Republican voters.