Please share this directly with anyone who might be interested. We really appreciate it!

@JeffRouder @doughertyorama @siminevazire This is very kind of you, @JeffRouder! Here's the paper:

@BrianNosek @ceptional @andre_quentin @siminevazire I built a tool that any data collection software can use to do this with OSF:

It's been 8 years since the original jsPsych paper. This update in JOSS talks about recent developments and what we think the future of the library might look like. And it's nice to finally have @BeckyAGilbert as an author given how much she has contributed to jsPsych!

We are lucky to have @steve_flusberg joining us next year!

RT @kurokida1: I made a sample program of DataPipe which send data from a experimental program to OSF. Thanks @joshdeleeuw for releasing a…

@kurokida1 This isn't supported yet. One security feature is that any write commands that would overwrite data are blocked, to prevent accidental or malicious data loss. Would a tool that could perform the aggregation after be helpful? Or do you need it during data collection?

RT @melissaekline: 🚨Psych-DS is hiring! 🚨 We are looking for a software engineer to build validation tools (Python, R, Javascript/client si…

DataPipe is still pretty new so if you try it out let me know what can be better. I'm eager to improve it.

RT @kim_meidenbauer: If you're interested in implementing the RC-RAGE in your own work, the @jspsych_org code that can be integrated with @…

@D0nShirley Right now it just assigns sequentially. In theory we could record completions and probabilistically assign conditions based on completion rate, and that could be a good future update. But it still won't fully solve the problem if more than one subject can run at the same time.

If you try it out, please let me know how it goes and what can be improved. The current version is stable and I've started relying on it for my own data collection, but there are plans to continue to develop the service and it would be great to know what you would find useful.