@CravedSanity Yes, given that you don't understand rudimentary human biology, it's hardly surprising that you don't understand human vestigiality either.

@SpartacusG0y @summoned_skull_ @kn1vecatcher @iwantmyforeskin IMO, there will be a slow and gradual decline in the infant circumcision rate until the number reaches around 50%, at which point there will be a precipitous decline because the social stigma of being uncircumcised and "he'll get teased in the locker room" will evaporate.

@Paraplane100 @Suviyafawn @ExtremeIntact @goalskii @Mankosmash @whatever I thought you guys might want to see this post. 😂🤣

@Suviyafawn @Paraplane100 @ExtremeIntact @goalskii @Mankosmash @whatever At least you admit you're using culture and religion to justify the genital cutting of children. Do you know who else uses religion and culture to justify the genital cutting of children? The folks in third world countries who commit female genital mutilation.

@CravedSanity It isn't a bad article, and it's never been discredited. Again, if you believe you've discredited Taylor & Lockwood's study, contact the British Journal Of Urology and submit your counterargument. They might just agree with you that the foreskin has no function, but I doubt it.

@CravedSanity You literally can't find anyone or anything who agrees with your radically warped theory that the foreskin has no known function. 😂

@CravedSanity But the most hilarious part of all is that while you sit here with your anatomy denialism, you don't even realize you can literally SEE the function of the foreskin in front of your very eyes when someone is giving you a handjob. 😂

@CravedSanity

@CravedSanity measure against HIV transmission.

RT @summoned_skull_: @DistractionNWS I hope everyone who circumcises a child gets their genitals crushed beyond recognition and then shot

@goalskii @Suviyafawn @Paraplane100 @ExtremeIntact @Mankosmash @whatever Yes, that's what you come to expect from Americans, but what makes it super annoying with her is that she claims to be on a mission to "expose the war on men", but she still hasn't made the connection...

@CravedSanity The BMJ is not an "anti circ" publication. It seems you didn't read even the title of your own article, much less the article itself. You know we're discussing infant circumcision - not voluntary medical male circumcision, yes? You know the African trials were debunked, yes?

@BuenoForMiami That's why I find it hard to understand why people like yourself from South America would voluntarily move to the US.

@Suviyafawn @ExtremeIntact @goalskii @Mankosmash @whatever You haven't had sex with intact men, so you can't draw such comparisons. Other American women have, and shared their results:

@Suviyafawn @Paraplane100 @ExtremeIntact @goalskii @Mankosmash @whatever The penis cannot function optimally when the prepuce has been removed. I get that you think it's "a piece of extra skin", that's why I'm trying to educate you. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision

@Suviyafawn @Paraplane100 @ExtremeIntact @goalskii @Mankosmash @whatever Infant circumcision was started in the US in the late 1800s, and only became a common hospital procedure after the first world war.