![Jesse Smith Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1562246006510682112/plm1ORFS_x96.jpg)
Jesse Smith
@jessesmithsoc
Followers
536
Following
6K
Statuses
1K
Assistant professor of sociology at Benedictine College | Do quant research on religion, politics, culture, family | All views expressed my own
Joined August 2022
@BrandonLukeMc Ironically the idea that this single study definitively settles the matter is itself evidence of the problem. Ideological slant helps determine what becomes a research agenda and what is a one-off study.
1
1
3
RT @ReadDemography: "Make It or Break It? Pregnancy Scares & Romantic Relationship Dissolution": L Newmyer & @syabiku examine the timing of…
0
3
0
Nice piece from @NadyaWilliams81 on the new Western Civ centers and troubling (but telling) reactions to them. Among other insights, highlights the anti-intellectualism of cordoning off large sets of thinkers/ideas due to perceived political associations.
0
1
3
Conservatives do a lot of political theory but not much social science, the result being a lot of nice ideas easily dismissed as armchair eggheadery. Nice piece from @kvallier here on the 30k-ft view of what a conservative research agenda might look like.
1
1
5
@LBRolsky Oh yes, the Bluey characters are important figures in our household. Another realization I have had is that quality children’s programming is just as important for the parents as the kids.
0
0
1
RT @DavidHughesTwit: Great read: “Sociology in the Age of Trump: The Clash of Deep Stories on the Left and Right” by Professor @jessesmit…
0
4
0
@SoterioPolitics In fairness, that’s for 2026. 2025 is the much more anodyne “Reimagining the Future of Work.”
0
0
1
@NDhingra4 That’s fair. I don’t think Rauch takes the problem seriously enough because he is determined to make knowledge elites *as a class* the heroes, even if some fall short. But I agree there aren’t universal principles to resolve the matter. Eventually it has to be case by case.
1
0
1
@NDhingra4 I appreciate your familiarity with my critique! And exactly so. He seems to expect knowledge elites to police themselves. He acknowledges the importance of viewpoint diversity, but doesn’t move to the logical conclusion that the lack of such diversity undermines elite authority.
1
0
2