![James Murray Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/790930841090293760/0jS5nJ4h_x96.jpg)
James Murray
@jamesnomurray
Followers
203
Following
10K
Statuses
998
International funding and project development advisor, UK voluntary youth worker & trustee of Sierra Leone & Zimbabwe environmental charities. views my own
London and Brighton, UK
Joined November 2013
@Degenerate0341 @CoryBooker Nothing can justify the waste and harm caused by this sudden closure. The list is full of errors and 1/2 truths. Maybe the new Admin does not favour DEI but that is a political decision and USAID would follow it.
0
0
1
@benryanwriter I think we've been complacent, taken the support we had for granted. But it seems many in the US don't know what they're watching being thrown away.
0
0
0
@SciGuyRu @benryanwriter We just need every country to do its bit, the US has done much less than most by the size of its economy, but is so big it represents a huge part of the overall effort, and HIV was a huge challenge for multiple reasons, yet with US leadership it had been controlled.
2
0
1
RT @sfishermurray: More than 20 of @frontlineaids partners have said they are affected by the US foreign aid freeze. Many partners have ha…
0
4
0
Gone through these myself, from 5 years of spend, that's all they have. Lies or smears. For this they have torn down billions in investment and are leaving people to die. Criminal vandalism.
The White House’s wildly inaccurate claims about USAID spending Eleven out of 12 claims about the agency’s work are misleading, wrong or lack context. As the Trump administration this week dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Development, the primary vehicle for U.S. foreign aid, the White House issued a statement justifying its actions. Titled “At USAID, Waste and Abuse Runs Deep,” the news release claimed USAID “has been unaccountable to taxpayers as it funnels massive sums of money to the ridiculous — and, in many cases, malicious — pet projects of entrenched bureaucrats, with next-to-no oversight.” The news release then listed 12 examples, plucked from the websites of right-wing media. But the numbers cited — as low as $32,000 — hardly justify the claim that these are “massive sums” of money. In fact, they are so low that some of the funds appear to have been awarded at the ambassador level, without Washington involvement. At least one dated from the first Trump administration, and some were actually State Department grants, not USAID. Whether they are “ridiculous” might be in the eye of the beholder. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt held up the sheet before reporters on Monday and declared, “I don’t know about you, but as an American taxpayer I don’t want my dollars going toward this crap.”
0
0
0
@benryanwriter Absolutely, over 5 years of activity that is all they have. So much of this is lies or innuendo.
0
0
1
@robert_lyman @TheBurmaStar @forgottenwarpod @Sampan_Travel @KohimaEdTrust @thinkdefence one for you..
0
0
3
@benryanwriter they have found so little to complain about going back 5 years, & three of the projects were state department funded not AID... and their responce is to destroy billions of dollars of investment and cause immense harm...
0
0
1
Trump gravely miscalculates how much Americans care about USAID as backl... via @YouTube $350m US food stuck in ports, $2b US food spend ended, 52k US private sector staff will be unemployed and this unethical shutdown is killing people in the south.
0
1
2
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY - RUAHA KATAVI AERIAL SURVEY via @YouTube Amazing work by WCS in Tanzania, so jealous of those who get to do this!
0
0
2
RT @benryanwriter: A lot of people are portraying USAID as some sort of bastion of looney DEI excesses. Let’s take a look at what the sudde…
0
3K
0
RT @ConcernMalawi: 🚨 Fraud Alert 🚨 Concern Worldwide Malawi is aware of circulating fake job adverts using our name. We DO NOT charge fe…
0
3
0
RT @DrNeilStone: RFK and his fans "just want to question science" If you question something for which theres overwhelming evidence you ign…
0
276
0
@Arctic_paws Looks really interesting and applicable across many disciplines related to human development, ultimately the question should be who owns the results? Is it the researcher (a territorial breed in conservation), the practitioners, the communities?
1
0
0