Funny how NGO funding is suddenly the ‘biggest con’ when farm subsidies have funneled hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars into corporate agriculture for decades. If wealth redistribution is the issue, maybe start with the $428 billion in farm subsidies since 1995—most of which went to large agribusinesses, not family farms. But I guess that kind of ‘government handout’ doesn’t fit the narrative.

Having money doesn’t make someone a genius—it just means they can pay real experts to execute their half-baked ideas. Only the easily impressed mistake that for actual skill. Even snails contribute more to the world—they at least enrich ecosystems instead of just chasing validation

@SecDef Only way a pogue could be there. Real Sec Defs visit the masses. They don't cosplay with door kickers. Fucking pogue.

@elonmusk When you post ridiculous claims that can not be verified if they ever existed in the first place, you muddy the waters of reality. If you have to make stuff up to pretend you have no value to the American people, you are doing nothing more than stealing our oxygen.

@PNW_Mountaineer @Subedei_Eternal @mrddmia @willchamberlain It makes you a well-read person. I think I may be going to deep for the Trumplicans to understand.

You’re right about one thing—the Executive does have all the power of the Executive Branch. But what you’re failing to grasp is that executive power isn’t unlimited—it operates within constitutional constraints and is subject to checks and balances. Article II, Section 1 does say, “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” But if you think that means absolute authority, you’ve completely ignored the rest of the Constitution. •The Judiciary can rule executive actions unconstitutional. •Congress can override vetoes, control funding, and impeach a president. •The Executive cannot legislate, only enforce laws passed by Congress. That’s why your argument falls apart. The Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) case wasn’t just about private corporations—it was a direct ruling on whether the President can seize power beyond what the Constitution allows. The Court ruled that executive power is not self-justifying—it must be derived from either Congress or the Constitution itself. In other words, just because the Executive wields executive power doesn’t mean that power is absolute or beyond question. If it were, the U.S. would be a dictatorship, not a constitutional republic. No constitutional question? That’s funny—because the Supreme Court has spent over two centuries clarifying exactly these kinds of questions. Maybe read beyond the first line next time.

@ThomasSowell Talking about the left, which has already been defeated, is like trying to stay as relevant as the ACLU. Just shut down. Your account is obsolete and a parody now.

Ah yes, the classic ‘if you disagree with me, you must be poor or bad at math’ argument—nothing says ‘educated take’ like dismissing economic discussions with personal attacks. The reality is, tipping culture in the U.S. exists because businesses offload labor costs onto customers, not because consumers are ‘cheap.’ If wages for servers were increased, tipping wouldn’t be necessary for them to earn a livable income—just like in most other developed countries. If you actually understand math and economics, you’d know that the restaurant industry relies on artificially low wages propped up by gratuity to avoid paying workers what they’re worth. Higher wages would reduce reliance on tips, provide income stability, and put the cost of labor where it belongs: on the business, not the customer. But sure, keep thinking it’s just about people being ‘poor.’ That level of economic insight is truly inspiring.

@strykerthane @LibertyCappy Just look over her profile. Elon bot. Don't engage.

@elonmusk Do people really believe you and Doge are different? The amount of data you possess and try to possess switched you from a technocrat to a full-on oligarch.

@Stonercat177290 @LibertyCappy Now you're talking! I think both sides have great ideas about how to help, and you just connected them both!

First, FDR never tried to nationalize the steel industry—you’re probably confusing it with Truman’s seizure of steel mills in 1952 (Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer), which the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional because he bypassed Congress. If you’re going to make historical comparisons, at least get the case right. Second, the courts’ role isn’t just to “limit government” but to ensure it operates within constitutional boundaries—which means striking down overreach and preventing presidents from ignoring their legal duties. The courts don’t exist just to shrink government; they exist to enforce constitutional limits, period. And as for your last point, courts don’t “order” policy whims—they rule on whether executive actions are constitutional. If Trump were legally obligated to build jets or install abacuses (which he isn’t), then yes, a court could enforce that. But that’s not how checks and balances work, and your attempt at a strawman only shows a misunderstanding of constitutional law. Might want to check your sauce—seems like it’s expired.

@TerryC40058623 @mrddmia @willchamberlain

@CNviolations Better check in on all those farmers that lost millions in the last week because of the Sharpie shithead. Fact check that before you try to answer.

@PNW_Mountaineer @mrddmia @willchamberlain Democracy died in daylight.

RT @PNW_Mountaineer: @Subedei_Eternal @jabbrewock @mrddmia @willchamberlain The executive branch only has the powers granted to it by Artic…

Trumplicans have the same problem as American Christians and Middle East Muslims. They are told what texts say and believe the speaker without crosschecking. I don't know if that is a reading problem or a cognitive dissonance problem. If its the former, it would be easier to blame public education for the lack of willpower to read than to take responsibility for just being lazy.

RT @SacramentoKings: 🟣🔦🟣🔦🟣🔦🟣🔦🟣🔦🟣

@ThomasSowell Complacency kills but Technocracy is the fuel.