No sé cómo cojones hay que explicarlo, ni tecnicsimos ni pollas. El modelo de negocio de apuestas deportivas de contrapartidas es una falsa, una trampa, una ratonera, un red de pesca de arrastre, un servicios fraudulento, un regulador fraudulento, una actividad mal ordenada, una aberración , una transgresión de derechos del consumidor, una ofensa a la inteligencia, un sistema perverso, un juego sin reglas justas ni transparentes, una estafa cogntiiva... y cualquiera que me demuestre que me equivoco... cierro mi cuenta de Twitter y desaparezco. ¿te enteras? Que luego dices que José Ramón se explica como el culo.

Y es que intelectualmente, si haces el debido ejercicio de roles e incentivos, no es difícil de llegar a esa conclusión IRREFUTABLE. Lo sorprendente es que llevemos así 20 años al amparo de Leyes y ante la ceguera Académica Comportamental.

@winnerodds Sí. Para cualquier actor institucional o corporativo ese el único código de comunicación que les puede hacer cambiar sus decisiones.

@Apuestines Ayer mismo trataba como es el estado actual de los servicios de personas pronosticadoras y cómo la situación está creando intoxicación y desinformación para la toma de decisiones de los consumidores de pronósticos.

Because as always, you need to hold on to the fact that a final consumer has to "offer *value* to a company" without taking into account that the money they pay - stake- is already that value. As it would be in any other game of change or poker except this one.

Comparing these two types of contracts directly can indeed be misleading because they operate under fundamentally different commercial and "learning" principles. Commutative contracts are based on the exchange of equivalents with known values, whereas aleatory contracts are inherently speculative, where the outcome is uncertain at the time of agreement. Please don't confuse the people by telling them about bag shops and vegetable&fruit shops 🥸.

Please, don't make absurd comparisons of risk-free, uncertainty-free, value-free service and commodity contracts of sale or commutative contracts with aleatory gambling contracts. 🙄

@VaughanLewis1 @OwenMcintosh_ @SanchezDiego00 @aluckyaday @stevenctilley @chrisgambler247 @sbc_josh @gondorffhenry @morlandgary @GambleWatchScot By the way, does Hermes have a specific license to market its products?

@aluckyaday @VaughanLewis1 @OwenMcintosh_ @SanchezDiego00 @stevenctilley @chrisgambler247 @sbc_josh @gondorffhenry @morlandgary @GambleWatchScot And if the window says that a bag costs 6,000 pounds and there are three units left and you want them, you can pay by transfer as long as you complete due diligence for transactions over 2,000, and I am sure that the seller will not object.😉

@VaughanLewis1 @OwenMcintosh_ @SanchezDiego00 @aluckyaday @stevenctilley @chrisgambler247 @sbc_josh @gondorffhenry @morlandgary @GambleWatchScot And only Roman law has been able to discover it. As all sportsbook compliance chiefs already know for Spain.

V. I know you understand me. Don't give it any more thought. If someone comes to a dealership to buy a porch, or to a store a Rolex, with legal and traceable money, the price is the only important element in the transaction and on which businessman and consumer agree.

@VaughanLewis1 @OwenMcintosh_ @SanchezDiego00 @aluckyaday @stevenctilley @chrisgambler247 @sbc_josh @gondorffhenry @morlandgary @GambleWatchScot BECAUSE PRICE IS THE ELEMENT THAT WILL NATURALLY MAKE DISCRIMINATION

@OwenMcintosh_ @VaughanLewis1 @SanchezDiego00 @aluckyaday @stevenctilley @chrisgambler247 @sbc_josh @gondorffhenry @morlandgary @GambleWatchScot Absurd truth? Can you imagine a business in which someone always understands you and buys at the price that YOU FREELY SET?

Due to the very nature of the legal contract that they are exploiting. But I already know that you will search without paying attention to it, much less realizing that it is not a typical free market. For the same reason that it is due to licensing conditions and that it cannot offer services to someone who does not pass the affordability checks.

@SanchezDiego00 @VaughanLewis1 @aluckyaday @OwenMcintosh_ @stevenctilley @chrisgambler247 @sbc_josh @gondorffhenry @morlandgary @GambleWatchScot They want to establish that companies can do business with whoever they want without any explanation other than "commercial will." And that, that has a name