@kolowski @ItIsHoeMath You are trying to add a monetary value to motherhood while not attributing a value to fatherhood. Let's call men and women equal, just as feminism would have it, canceling out any difference Therefore the statement "women are net negative" is still correct.

@JeffFisch The issue isn't the money for weapons in as much as it's the money for NGOs. That's where the issue is

RT @JoshRainerGold: Travis Brown used his time at Twitter to create a backdoor to access private information of countless anon accounts, cr…

Simple, you want equality, you get equality. You are a good example of the female brain that this thread is about. btw, in your "motherhood" lens, you completely ignore fatherhood. But that's to be expected, because to women it's all about what they can get and not what they can give.

@kolowski @ItIsHoeMath Let's start with repealing the 19th Amendment and then we can go from there. Until then, rules are rules. Men are living by those rules, so should women.

RT @Real_RobN: 🚨🚨CONSPIRACY THEORY NO MORE, Two reasons why fraudulent SSN’s were provided to illegals by Democrats. A: 10,000 illegals…

@kolowski @ItIsHoeMath Yes, and I would like to see motherhood valued more, but we live in a feminist world now, and according to feminist rules, the value of women is based on their earnings. Don't like that, then do something about your sisters in feminism.

RT @Millie__Weaver: Thread: 1. Far-Left US Government Employees Conspired To Subvert President Trump, Gum Up Bureaucratic Processes, Strike…

RT @Cernovich: USAID numbers are big but those non-profit salaries hit harder to the median voter. You work your ass off for 50K a year, wh…

RT @BachelorJoker: This half time show is so bad sitting on my TV and watching my lounge chair is actually an improvement.

FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

@AnuPeltola22 @Gerashchenko_en Have you read it? We actually did seek action in the UN Security council as committed. Read the whole thing and let me know what portion the US has not abided by.

@ItIsHoeMath It's also a form of camouflage.

RT @douglasritz: @DefiantLs “Just gonna leave this here.”

RT @seanmdav: “The judiciary” is most certainly NOT a co-equal branch of government. Only The Supreme Court is. The rest of the federal ju…

RT @LarryTaunton: ***USAID - CAIRO 1/14*** Today I paid an unexpected visit to the USAID headquarters in Cairo. The last few years I have…

Looks like it's completely illegal since it wasn't even started by an Executive Order, but instead a bureaucratic decree Grok Origin and Influence: The STEM OPT extension appears to be directly attributable to Congressional testimony by Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates on March 12, 2008. His testimony highlighted the need for more skilled workers in STEM fields, influencing policy changes that encouraged foreign students to pursue STEM degrees in the U.S. Policy Implementation: Following this, on April 2, 2008, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michael Chertoff announced a 17-month extension to the OPT for students in qualifying STEM fields. This was not a result of direct legislation by Congress but rather an administrative decision by DHS, which was within their regulatory power to extend practical training for certain visa categories. Legal Challenges: The STEM OPT extension faced legal challenges, notably a lawsuit filed by the Immigration Reform Law Institute on May 31, 2008, which contested the legality of the extension. However, the program has continued, with adjustments, indicating its resilience despite the lack of a direct congressional mandate. Subsequent Changes: Over the years, the STEM OPT program has seen expansions, with the extension period eventually increasing to 24 months for STEM graduates, as noted in the USCIS guidelines mentioned in the web results. These changes were implemented through regulatory processes by USCIS rather than through new legislation.

@W7VOA See the corrupt cry out to protect their corruption

@Vachefolle666 @Gerashchenko_en That's up to them. I have no problem selling F-35s to Europe. If Europe doesn't want them, they can remain in the stone age if they choose. I do have a problem using our F-35s to protect Europe if they don't do anything to protect themselves.