![Daniel Hanley Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1279925570009251841/3u2gAhNU_x96.jpg)
Daniel Hanley
@danielahanley
Followers
2K
Following
8K
Statuses
9K
Senior Legal Analyst at @openmarkets. Opinions are my own.
Joined May 2011
In my new paper in @CompPolicyInt, I argue that refusals to deal operate as an anti-coercion mechanism, preventing corporations from forcing dependent firms to comply with their unilateral demands, & I explain why this principle needs to be revived.
1
6
20
RT @davidsirota: šØNEWS: @LeverNews has unearthed a White House memo from John Roberts saying that presidents may not fire appointees at indā¦
0
142
0
The S&P 500 also wasted an additional $2 trillion over the last two years on mergers and acquisitions. That money could have gone toward investments in innovation, productive capacity, or worker wages - instead, it went to financers and executives.
Over the last five years S&P 500 firms have spent $4 trillion repurchasing their own shares. that is roughly equivalent to the amount they spent on CapEx.
1
1
4
RT @regulatorynerd: This is a cute gimmick, but Jamie Dimon was there pre-2008 and also remembers well how prudential regulators were captuā¦
0
4
0
RT @DRBoguslaw: What if I told you multiple members of congress are being treated for dementia at a top secret luxury clinic under capitolā¦
0
3K
0
RT @austinahlman: poor guys had no choice but to do techno-fascism after the big mean democrats made a modest attempt to get them follow thā¦
0
3
0
RT @davidenrich: Trump megadonor Steve Wynn has filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to overturn the landmark 1964 decision in New Yorā¦
0
2K
0
RT @Lfelizleon: NEW: We are living through an existential crisis. The CEO attacks against the working class are only intensifying. We needā¦
0
117
0
RT @andrewperezdc: Democrats āPissedā at Constituents for Asking Literally Anything of Them
0
353
0
RT @Max_Fisher: The single most important article yet published on Trump's second term, by two scholars who since 2016 have been consistentā¦
0
6K
0
RT @_ericblanc: Muskās attacks on federal workers pose an existential threat to the whole labor movement, all workers, and the broad Leftā¦
0
289
0
RT @RobertFreundLaw: Every single criticism of the CFPB on my timeline has come from either a crypto evangelist or someone who was sued byā¦
0
282
0
RT @LaurenKGurley: Scoop: Trump fired a Biden-appointed member of the Federal Labor Relations Authority, Susan Tsui Grundmann Like NLRB boā¦
0
169
0
On and on the irony goes. Here's the founder of a stupid conservative media outlet called The Federalist.
Random federal judges in blue state backwaters have no authority to unilaterally dictate who the President may talk to or what data he can access. John Roberts and SCOTUS have two options here: they can bring these inferior malcontents to heel, or they can get used to the President simply ignoring these inferior courts or Congress eliminating them entirely. Congress created these inferior courts so the Supreme Court wouldnāt have to deal with every federal case by itself. But if these rogue inferior judges are going to routinely issue lawless decisions that the Supreme Court has to deal with anyway, Congress would be well within its rights to just eliminate them. Roberts and SCOTUS can immediately put these lawless judges in their place, or Roberts can watch his caseload go up 1000x and his courtās precious perceived legitimacy crater overnight. The age of tolerating this nonsense is over.
0
0
0