![Lando Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1377070805092335619/8b8zn91-_x96.jpg)
Lando
@cryptomessenger
Followers
4K
Following
2K
Statuses
6K
Founder @apriltoken— $APRIL - https://t.co/gy8yViaM3x
Joined January 2014
Massive, brave new world for the crypto industry!
NEW: I believe this is the first ETF to file with the SEC and request the ability to permit Staking. @21Shares
0
0
1
This is major development the neocons are gonna lose it!
⚡️#BREAKING Putin invited Trump to Moscow, Peskov said.
0
0
0
Tulsi is great!
🚨 #BREAKING: Tulsi Gabbard has officially been CONFIRMED as President Trump’s Director of National Intelligence Another MASSIVE loss for the deep state! Congratulations Tulsi!
0
0
0
RT @JSeyff: Update: As expected. SEC is acknowledging more Solana filings. The important ones will be if they acknowledge XRP & Doge filing…
0
63
0
This a big improvement the “head movement” give away from earlier models is no longer there. The voice+lip sync needs work as you rightly mentioned.
New AI model from China. Goku is creating amazing videos! But… it needs a little bit more training in English to match the lips with the sounds. Can you find the mistake in this one?
0
0
1
That’s on top of the other early radar tech Russia is providing China. Both can easily see F35’s.
🇨🇳CHINA SAYS ITS AIRSHIP CAN TRACK F-35s FROM 1,800KM AWAY Turns out, “invisible” isn’t so invisible when your exhaust plume glows like a bonfire. Chinese scientists claim their stratospheric airship, packed with infrared detectors and 300mm telescopes, can spot an F-35 from nearly 2,000km just by following its heat trail. Front-on detection? A mere 350km—because even stealth jets know how to keep their cool. Source: SCMP
0
0
1
RT @WatcherGuru: JUST IN: 🇨🇳🇺🇸 China to impose 10-15% tariffs on US energy and vehicles on Monday.
0
1K
0
Wait till the next major release for Deepseek. Google with so much more resources should be much more ahead.
🚨GOOGLE DEEPMIND CEO: CHINA’S AI “BREAKTHROUGH” ISN’T ACTUALLY NEW DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis just took a polite-but-deadly swipe at China’s Deepseek AI. Sure, he says it’s “probably the best work” from China—but it's just a cheap knock-off using old AI tricks in a shiny new wrapper. No actual breakthroughs, just basic engineering. China's Deepseek claims it trained its AI for a fraction of the cost using less-powerful Nvidia chips. Experts, however, are looking at those numbers like a math teacher grading a failed test. Something isn’t adding up. Meanwhile, Hassabis casually drops that AI smarter than humans (AGI) could be here in 5 years. So, uh, enjoy these last few years of being the smartest species on Earth. Source: CNBC
0
0
0
They will see how power is displayed when Russia and US starts the negotiations to conclude the Ukraine war. Those without power won’t have any say. Russia which has won the war will dictate its terms.
You speak as if power is something to be granted, as if history is a stage where nations wait for their turn, patiently hoping to be acknowledged by those who came before. This is a child's fantasy. Power is not granted—it is taken, earned, and held through will, strategy, and vision. No empire in history ever received its crown by the good graces of its rivals. Rome did not wait for Carthage to approve its rule. Britain did not seek permission from Spain. America did not ask Europe to "grant" it dominance—it seized the moment left by a shattered world. Yet now, in the face of China’s rise, you rewrite the rules. You claim America was granted power by Europe and the USSR—no, America emerged because Europe was in ruins, and the USSR, for all its might, lacked the means to impose its will without self-destruction. America did not win by fighting last—it won by being the only one left with its economy intact. There was no granting, only circumstance. And now you say China must wait for America, Europe, India, Russia—even Africa and Islam—to grant it power? Do you hear yourself? Was China granted its industrial strength? Its technological advances? Its military resurgence? No—China built them. Through blood, sweat, and discipline. You want China to wait, to beg, to seek permission from those who once carved it up like a feast for imperial appetites? That will not happen. You mock China's lack of war experience. But tell me, what have your wars achieved? Vietnam? A retreat. Afghanistan? A disaster. Iraq? A quagmire. Libya? A shattered ruin. Syria? A bleeding wound. Two centuries of conflict, yet your victories are few, your enemies persistent, your costs immeasurable. The real war is not fought with bombs—it is fought with patience, endurance, and the ability to shape history without reckless destruction. China has not wasted itself on endless battles. It has studied. Adapted. Prepared. And you think China does not understand power? China has understood power since Sun Tzu wrote The Art of War, while your ancestors were still wandering the forests of Europe. You boast that you can call your president anything you want. But what has that freedom brought you? A divided nation, paralyzed by its own contradictions, unable to agree on its own future. A system where 100 million people "think like the president" is not strength—it is chaos disguised as democracy, indecision masquerading as freedom. A nation where "everyone is a king" is a nation where no one rules. And now, in your desperation, you clutch at narratives of demographic collapse, climate disaster, and economic decline—as if the world does not see America's own unraveling. Your debt spirals. Your social fractures widen. Your politics consume themselves. You are a fading empire warning the rising one of disaster, yet it is you who stumbles toward the abyss. You say China is playing Mahjong with bad tiles? Perhaps. But Mahjong is not poker. It is not a game of bluffing and bravado. It is a game of patience. Of calculation. Of knowing when to strike, when to wait, and when to let an opponent destroy himself with his own arrogance. And China has been playing this game for 5,000 years. So tell me, cowboy: Who truly holds the winning hand?
0
0
0
RT @nxt888: Foreign influence is not measured by the number of iPhones or the presence of Starbucks. It is measured by sovereignty. In 19…
0
295
0