Message

"Scoop": An executive from the company that made today's Super Bowl coin tells @Covers he is predicting "heads" for the coin toss

We have all that we need to deflect — we just launch a rocket to nudge it in the rear to make it miss Earth. The challenge is all about early detection and trajectory simulation. Over the long march of biological and now technological evolution, we have finally reached a survival gate — we have enough computational power to model the trajectory all Near-Earth Objects (NEO's) that could threaten life on Earth. This was not possible in the year 2000, or any time over the prior millennia. We have made a million-fold improvement in computation in just the past 20 years. So, we can see the future and predict decades in advance of an impact event and then give the NEO a nudge such that it misses Earth entirely. It’s not like the movies, where you have an asteroid on final approach and try to blow it up somehow (that just turns a rifle into a shotgun blast); instead, you launch a rocket to rear-end it and change its velocity ever so slightly. Integrated over years, that small delta-v makes all the difference. In short, asteroid defense does not end with a bang, but merely a nudge. That is, if you know what you are doing! Rusty Schweickart, the first Lunar Module Pilot summarizes: “We live in a remarkable time in history. We can change the trajectory of the solar system, ever so slightly, and protect life on Earth"

🚨#BREAKING: NASA now says there's a 1.9% chance that a large asteroid will hit Earth in 2032, up from 1.6% yesterday 📌#Earth | #OuterSpace According to NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies, there is now a 1.9% chance that a large asteroid could pass close enough to Earth within the next decade to pose a potential threat. The odds of impact in 2032 have increased from 1.6% yesterday to 1.9% today, translating to a 1 in 53 chance of collision or a 98.1% chance that the asteroid will miss Earth. The asteroid, named 2024 YR4, measures between 130 and 330 feet in diameter. These estimates will likely fluctuate as more data becomes available.

I spent this weekend doing an investigation into the Nacho Barbero GTOW/ACR/Venom scandal. I tried to provide as much information/data/actual hands to give a representation of his game play on that day. I went over 1300 hands (652 in detail) analysed his GTOW history and used the best tools possible to make an overall analysis of his game. All the data I used and all the hands I used will be available in comments for everybody to make their own mind up. I’ll answer any questions in the comments, just please be nice. I’ll also go on @SolveForWhyTV in the next days and they can grill me as much as they like. I am not active as defence for Nacho or ACR here, I believe he should be held to account for his negligence, but I am not judge or juror. I live in Vegas where my online options are extremely limited yet still don’t play Venom or ACR, I work for their competitor CoinPoker and it is not in my interests to make Nacho look innocent.