This is a bigger deal than most realize. Bitcoin has baked-in UTXO-based solution to efficient onchain batching No need for fanzy zk-proofs and convoluted verifier setups Just pre-signed transactions, servers and batched outputs A legit caching layer to unify onchain liquidity

@TheDesertLynx I am. He’s a pathological liar so I’m certainly not going to support someone who I can’t take at their word.

@TheBCHPodcast Lol what are you talking about. This is not a serious conversation.

@SDLerner Nop, I don’t think I will.

@TheBCHPodcast jfc, make it make sense dude. what do they say? that transaction batching isn’t the equivalent of pos vs pow? like really, what are you even saying. is there any conversation that can be had with you guys that doesn’t devolve to block size limit.

@SDLerner Well that’s cool but bridges are a fundamentally bad idea. And my opinion on this has nothing to do with Ark.

@TheBCHPodcast No, it’s not the same argument, at all.

@SDLerner You misunderstand. It’s not that I don’t want better bridges. I don’t want bridges at all. No one does.

@SDLerner

@TheBCHPodcast Well except it doesn’t have to. See tx batching. Same input, more output.

@TheBCHPodcast Cause one scales, as evidenced by the fact that it doesn’t require additional resources :)

@RoxomTV whose skinny fit is tighter

@HouseofZK @brian_trollz You should absolutely get paid for your work.

HK McD kinda lit McRibs and pineapple? Word?

@HouseofZK fwiw I have nothing to say against the hosts you guys did what you had to do.

@HouseofZK You've picked your lane and from the looks of it you are putting a whole lot of work trying to build your brand. I don't have a problem with your platform except maybe it's a complete shill fest. Then again you're just playing the game.

@HouseofZK I appreciate the thought but I'll pass.