An important reminder about today's jobless claims figures: As bad as they will be (and they will be catastrophically bad), they will NOT reflect the full scope of the problem. The true number of lost jobs is significantly higher.
Three main reasons (thread):
Democrats want to tax the rich. Voters -- including a significant number of Republicans -- are largely cheering them on.
With
@jimtankersley
Data from
@SurveyMonkey
One of my goals this year was to be more aware of the diversity (or lack thereof) of my source list. To that end, I've been tracking (as best I can) the gender and race of everyone I quote in my stories.
In the interest of accountability, some stats:
“Will you hike if yields rise?”
“We will not hike if yields rise.
We will not catch you by surprise.
We will not hike on Phillips Curve.
We will not hike if prices swerve.
Not when inflation gets to 2,
Not when U3 hits NAIRU.
Do not ask me any more!
Full employment, not before!”
Honestly, at first glance I have no idea what to make of the jobs report. Not just that it was weak, but the particular way it was weak, is perplexing. So come with me as I try to work through it the only way I know how -- with charts!
Given the renewed attention on the possibility of a $15 federal minimum wage, it's worth noting that "$15/hour" looks very different in 2021 than it did when the "Fight for $15" movement began in 2012. (Thread)
I don't love the term "Great Resignation," but at least people really were, you know, resigning (albeit usually to take other jobs). "Quiet Quitting" is just not an accurate description of the phenomenon it purports to describe.
Spent all night trying to think of who Marianne Williamson's voice reminds me of. My wife just figured it out:
@evilhag
as Burt Macklin's girlfriend on Parks & Rec.
For one thing, a lot of people don't qualify for unemployment benefits. Self-employed, gig workers, independent contracts don't qualify. Nor do many part-timers, recent hires or very low earners. (The Senate bill would change some of that, temporarily.)
The $600 supplement to unemployment benefits has allowed laid-off workers to pay rent and buy groceries, and has helped prop up the broader economy.
Now we are mere days away from it expiring -- even as economic conditions are deteriorating once again.
So far, the "Great Resignation" is mostly a blue-collar phenomenon -- job-to-job transitions for non-college grads are soaring. For college grads, they're just returning to pre-Covid levels.
If Daylight Saving Time wants to improve its branding, it should really have us spring forward at like 4 p.m. on a Monday instead.
"Wait, why is everyone going home already? Oh right, Daylight Saving starts today!!!"
Second, a lot of people who *do* qualify don't know it. I've heard people saying things like "I got furloughed not laid off so I can't get benefits." Many of those people almost certainly do qualify, but have gotten bad info (or in some cases been misled by employers).
Trump and his supporters often blame the struggling economy on blue-state restrictions on business activity.
But a look at Iowa shows how even in a state that never locked down, the economy is nowhere close to normal.
With
@jimtankersley
:
“Print is dead,” they say, until people line up around the block for a copy of this powerful project.
Congratulations to
@nhannahjones
and everyone who made this happen.
Why does the U.S. have one of the lowest rates of breastfeeding in the industrialized world? Maybe it’s because we expect new moms to go back to work almost immediately, then force them literally to smuggle breast pumps past security to pump at work.
Third, the sudden flood of claims has overwhelmed state UI systems. There are tons of reports of jammed phone lines, overloaded servers and claimants who aren't able to file (I've spoken to several myself). Others may have heard those stories and decided not to bother trying.
Economics is overwhelmingly white, and has a reputation for being dismissive of (if not openly hostile to) Black economists. Now they say that has left the field ill equipped for a moment when racism is at the center of the policy debate.
@jimtankersley
Unemployment benefits and other government aid programs have been a vital lifeline for millions of displaced workers during this crisis.
If Congress doesn't act soon, that lifeline could snap.
As some of you know, I recently had a (non-COVID) health scare, which left me hospitalized for several days. I'm on the mend now, thanks to some excellent medical care, but if you'll forgive the digression from my usual econ tweeting, I wanted to share a few quick thoughts.
Interestingly, my sources were significantly more diverse in stories that weren't written on deadline. That suggests that I'm doing a good job searching out sources when I have time, but that under deadline pressure, I fall back on a core group of white guys.
All of which means we should think of today's claims number as a lower bound for the number of people who lost jobs last week. And of course today's numbers won't tell us anything about people who lost jobs *this* week.
U.S. employers added or brought back 1.8 million jobs in July, down from 4.8 million in June. For perspective, we're still down 12.9 million since February.
THREAD: In July 2017, Brett Favre met with Mississippi DHS Director John Davis and non-profit operator Nancy New.
They would help him get millions in welfare funds to pay for a volleyball stadium at USM—where his daughter was about to play volleyball. 1/
I'm still seeing a LOT of discussion on here about the "error" in yesterday's jobs numbers.
Here are the two key points:
1. The unemployment rate would have fallen *regardless* of the classification issue;
2. The unemployment rate is still shockingly high by any measure.
U.S. employers added 528k jobs in July, far more than expected. The unemployment rate fell to 3.5%, matching its prepandemic level (a 50-year low).
Data:
Full coverage:
The $600/week unemployment supplement helped jobless workers build up some savings, which helped sustain them — and the economy — when the supplement ended. But now those savings are running out.
Good data here from
@emilymbadger
@qdbui
@p_ganong
.
One thing I hear from consumers is that they aren't feeling the drop in inflation because prices are still rising for the basic items they have to buy often.
Well, grocery prices were flat in May (+1% y/y). Clothing prices were down (+0.8% y/y). So were gas prices (+2.2% y/y).
Economist Patrick Anderson, who opposed the 2008 bailouts: “This is different. It’s not a bailout if you, the government, tell a business to close, and then they ask you to help cover payroll while they’re closed. That’s not a bailout — you told them to close.”
This is a very cool new interactive from
@FiveThirtyEight
. It lets you see how the odds change depending on who wins specific states.
So if Trump wins PA, he has a 73% probability of winning the election, but just 3% if he loses it.
Couple particularly striking things in this poll: A slim majority of *Republicans* support
@SenWarren
’s idea for a wealth tax in the richest Americans.
We'll get a fuller picture eventually in the monthly jobs report, but not until May -- the data in next week's jobs report was collected two weeks ago, before the worst of the layoffs.
Layoffs are rising again and Americans’ incomes are falling, the latest signs that the one-two punch of a resurgent pandemic and waning government aid are undermining the U.S. economic recovery.
The $600 a week in extra unemployment benefits ran out in July. Congress and the president can’t agree on how to replace them.
For many Americans, it may already be too late to prevent lasting financial harm.
With
@gillianreporter
6th grader: “Why do we have to learn about the Great Depression?”
Me: “Because it was a period of great hardship for millions of people, and it taught us lessons about how to avoid ever letting it happen ag... uh, because your teacher said so.”
Biden’s econ team “is unified by a commitment to running the economy hot — with strong growth and low unemployment — in order to drive up wages.” Via
@arappeport
@jimtankersley
Something that came up repeatedly in interviews for this story: The extra $600 in UI benefits is REALLY helping workers. There's been (appropriately) lots of attention on the system's failures. But for ppl able to get the help, it's made a huge difference.
How bad will unemployment claims be next week? Shockingly, shockingly bad.
We're already at 600k+ based on data from just 15 states, per
@JustinWolfers
&
@qdbui
. (Today's *nation-wide* data showed 281k initial claims last week.)
Another 1.3 million Americans filed for unemployment benefits last week. That's 832k under regular state programs (not seasonally adjusted) and another 489k under the federal Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program.
Donald Trump lost more than $1 billion from 1985 to 1994 -- more than nearly any other individual American taxpayer.
Another huge scoop from
@russbuettner
&
@susannecraig
The economics profession is finally facing up to a longstanding problem: widespread harassment, discrimination and bullying against women, people of color and members of the LGBTQ community.
Republicans' optimism about the economy absolutely plunged after the election -- it fell even more than when the pandemic hit last spring.
Me and
@jimtankersley
, with data from
@SurveyMonkey
:
One last note: Besides family and friends, nothing did more to help me get through this than art. In particular, this gorgeous Amy Sherald portrait, which I could see out my hospital window. (Is it strange to say I came to think of this young woman as a friend?)
Bill Spriggs spent four decades trying to root out racial injustice in society and in his own profession. He was, as
@SandyDarity
put it, "deeply committed to the idea that we do economics because we have a social purpose."
My obituary:
The worst news in this report: The number of people reporting they have lost their jobs permanently (as opposed to being on temporary layoff/furlough) rose again. Evidence of mounting long-run damage to the economy.
U.S. economic output fell 9.5% in the second quarter, by far the largest drop in the 70+ years of data. For context: Economic output fell 4% during the entirety of the Great Recession -- and took 18 months to get there.