Richard R Balsamo, MD, JD
@balsamo_r
Followers
985
Following
47K
Statuses
14K
Physician and Attorney. Played some baseball for UChicago -- Go Maroons. Likes and retweets are not endorsements.
Chicagoland and SW Michigan
Joined May 2019
This has been my pinned tweet for the last two years, but it was recently completely deleted from "X" by "X."
2
12
46
These serial "resistance" district court anti-Trump opinions take time and energy to appeal, and meanwhile 25 more get filed. The Democrat resistance lawfare strategy is to bog down Trump in innumerable lawsuits, and sadly it may work unless Trump gets tough right now.
Enjoy Democrats because every single one of these district court orders will be reversed on appeal and not only do we know that but you all know that too. Anything to fundraiser off of your low IQ base.
0
0
1
@DefiyantlyFree But these serial "resistance" district court anti-Trump opinions take time and energy to appeal, and meanwhile 25 more get filed. The Democrat resistance lawfare strategy is to bog down Trump in innumerable lawsuits, and sadly it may work unless Trump gets tough right now.
0
0
0
We obviously have 5 co-equal branches of federal government = Legislative, Executive, Judicial, Administrative Deep State, and Federal District Court Judges.
There are at least 677 US district court judges. And every one of them apparently has more power than the President. They can issue a sweeping injunction to stop the President over actions large and small. This system can’t work this way. Supreme Court needs to stop this before the people demand the President does.
0
3
5
@AnnCoulter We have FIVE co-equal branches of federal government = Legislative, Executive, Judicial, Administrative Deep State, and Federal District Court Judges.
0
0
0
@zerohedge The existential domestic threat to the Trump Admin is usurpation of executive authority by rogue Democrat "resistance" federal district court judges. This problem must be dealt with quickly and definitively. Trump should only accede to en banc federal appeals court decisions.
0
0
0
The existential domestic threat to the Trump Admin is usurpation of executive authority by rogue Democrat "resistance" federal district court judges. This problem must be dealt with quickly and definitively. Trump should only accede to en banc federal appeals court decisions.
The Empire Strikes Back: Judge Orders CDC, FDA, And Other Agencies To Restore Woke Webpages
0
0
0
RT @seanmdav: This is exactly right. If Roberts and SCOTUS allow this nonsense to continue, the inferior courts will be ignored and become…
0
589
0
@EmeraldRobinson One single US District Court judge should not be able to halt decisions of the President. It should take an en banc federal appeals court decision.
0
1
3
RT @barrybutler9: The Wrigley Building over a frozen Chicago River for a Monday Memory. Today in 2021.
0
80
0
RT @Humanspective: Pfizer execs: “We had special batches of [mRNA vaccine] for our Pfizer Employees” Now we know Pfizer did a “bait and sw…
0
592
0
@LandsknechtPike Maximilian was foolish to ever leave. Perhaps a golden bird in a golden cage, but a live golden bird.
0
0
1
Avanti! is a seriously underappreciated Jack Lemon / Billy Wilder romantic comedy gem. My favorite Lemon film.
@hazelflag Avanti! Is a seriously underappreciated Jack Lemon / Billy Wilder romantic comedy gem. My favorite Lemon film.
0
0
0
@hazelflag Avanti! Is a seriously underappreciated Jack Lemon / Billy Wilder romantic comedy gem. My favorite Lemon film.
0
0
0
One single US District Court judge should not be able to halt decisions of the President. It should take an en banc federal appeals court decision.
A judge has no Constitutional authority to ban an Executive Branch appointee from accessing anything in an Executive Branch agency. The President is the head of the branch. The judge has no power over that plenary Constitutional authority. Defy the orders. Impeach the judge.
0
0
3
@KeithGrossFL One single US District Court judge should not be able to halt decisions of the President. It should take an en banc federal appeals court decision.
0
0
1
@Cernovich One single US District Court judge should not be able to halt decisions of the President. It should take an en banc federal appeals court decision.
0
0
2
@HansMahncke This judge’s ruling shows how utterly afraid and desperate the Democrat Deep State is now.
0
2
7
