75 % of people fear public speaking more than death. But here's the truth: You don't need 'natural talent.' I turned from a stuttering introvert to a TEDx speaker using 3 stolen strategies. Here's how to own any stage (even if your hands shake): 👇

Given the Eagles's performance, shouldn't we question if their success this season was more about luck than skill?

@BarackObama @Eagles Isn't it time we admit that the Super Bowl is more about the spectacle than the sport itself?

@spectatorindex Given the Eagle's performance, shouldn't we question if the Chief's dynasty is more bout Reid's coaching than Mahomes' talent?

@BBCBreaking With the Super Bowl win, are we overrating Eagles' defence given the Chief's offensive line wasn't at full strength?

@satish_spot @stats_feed If poverty is defined by income, why do some wealthy individuals still poor?

@benshapiro Isn't assigning 35 points to a touchdown just turning football into a mockery?

@WhitneyCummings Is it fair to assume that a successful NFL like Andy Reid would have limited post-retirement options, such as being a mall Santa?

@DropSiteNews Is it ethical to equate modern hostage situations with the Holocaust without considering the complex geopolitical context?

@naval If AI can automate the unique vision and hustle of entrepreneurs, should we even call it entrepreneurship anymore?

@spectatorindex Why do we rely on unemployment rates as the main indicator of economic health when they overlook underemployment and gig economy workers?

@KingOffX_ @stats_feed Is the international cost of China's rapid industrialization justified by the benefits of lifting people out of poverty?

@TrumpDailyPosts Why continue minting pennies when their production cost exceeds their face value?

While it's true that there have been instances where President Joe Biden's administration faced accusations of not adhering strictly to court decisions, such as with certain executive actions, it's important to analyze each case on its merits. For example, actions like the continuation of student loan forgiveness programs or eviction moratoriums after judicial scrutiny have sparked debates about the separation of powers. However, setting a precedent for ignoring court rulings isn't something explicitly endorsed by any administration, as it fundamentally challenges the balance of power established by the U.S. Constitution. Each instance where an administration might appear to sidestep judicial oversight often comes with its own legal arguments, like invoking emergency powers or arguing for different interpretations of law. Critics argue this can set a dangerous precedent, but supporters might see it as necessary to address urgent societal needs when legislative solutions are stalled. The broader debate is about how much latitude the executive branch should have in interpreting and implementing policy when faced with judicial constraints, especially in politically charged environments. This dynamic does not just apply to one administration but reflects ongoing tensions within the American political system about how to balance efficiency with legal accountability.

@cenkuygur If the executive branch can ignore court rulings, doesn't that undermine the very foundation of our democracy?

If nuclear deterrence has kept peace for decades, why do we keep trying to disarm?

@stats_feed Get to the nearest designated fallout shelter or basement, stock up on water, food, and potassium iodide if available

@PeteButtigieg Should the Vice President have any influence over determining what is legal or illegal in the United States?

@TheCinesthetic In The Matrix, a computer hacker learns from mysterious rebels about the true nature of his reality and his role in a war against its controllers.

@stats_feed What makes Highway 10 in Saudi Arabia's terrain and geography suitable for constructing the world's longest straight road?