avrzan Profile Banner
zan Profile
zan

@avrzan

Followers
1K
Following
2K
Statuses
4K

morphologist +++

Joined June 2020
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@avrzan
zan
7 minutes
Hmm. How come there is no information loss across spacetime? Perhaps there is. We simply haven’t sampled enough yet. (The level of uncertainty is uncertain, lol, trillion trillion stars, infinite universes, dark energy, yada yada) Plus, it would cause mass hysteria so even if it happened attempts would be made to classify it, or culturally launder it. Too much knowledge always threatens the social fabric, each of which is built around a consensus and stasis. If tomorrow some guy did report something he just be institutionalized or crucified or ignored. Also there is a false equivalence between very large and the infinite here. If God is infinite and he created the universe which is also infinite, how does a finite simulation running on a finite program on a finite computer compare? No matter how large? There’s always something larger, hence origin of bugs. So if there were bugs in this universe they would come from other universes. But that begs the question, what is the deeper set of laws governing the mechanics of these bugs, the laws governing the laws? And so on So in the face of the actual bottommost infinite (if there is one), concepts such as bugs are nonsensical. Like your dreams. Your dreams are your own creations, in which there are no “bugs”, there cannot be. Only revelations. So the concept of bugs or invasions or unpredictable elements only applies to that which there is something else bigger than. When i run simulations in my mind, there are no bugs either
0
0
0
@avrzan
zan
22 hours
@a_real_society the theoretical maximum is 200
0
0
1
@avrzan
zan
24 hours
@DuneQuoteBot this can be either virtue or vice, depending on culture and context and individual. if unmodulated, definitely dysgenic spaciousness without spontaneity is slop
0
0
1
@avrzan
zan
24 hours
@DurantQuotesBot yeah the whole arc has been foreseen, pretty sure christ knew about the singularity and everything in the middle
0
0
1
@avrzan
zan
24 hours
@ns123abc @sama yeah but at that point only the state can fund it, I am not sure he appreciates the full gravity of that dynamic it's much easier for elon-trump to start a new department and divert all the money saved into end to end owned supply chain of compute energy combos madhatter projec
1
0
4
@avrzan
zan
24 hours
@KTmBoyle good political speech
0
0
0
@avrzan
zan
24 hours
oh it's never been done before? good. oh it's speculative, unproven? good. oh you're gonna get there, but don't know how? good.
1
1
22
@avrzan
zan
24 hours
@NoLieWithBTC lol cute immune response. also ironically normalizes and legitimizes the original acquisition proposal, so kudos
0
0
0
@avrzan
zan
1 day
its a little different. the pre-human evolutionary paradigm was entirely genetic. the human is part-genetic, part-memetic. human evolution is slow genetic evolution plus much faster cultural evolution the post human is entirely memetic, entirely cultural. no genes involved. this whole arc is the arc of the evolution of evolution. so billion solar years of pre-human evolution is a million solar years of human evolution, and a single solar year of post human evolution et cetera. animals have knowledge encoded only in genes, humans in genes plus culture, ai's in only culture although, here's the important bit: genes do not have to be static, not for humans. this is what the occult and the mystical and the technological, as it is sometimes called, is about. mastery of the individual over genetic expression, and thus, over space and time. because it is just genes keeping one bound in space and time via existential transactions such as food, sleep, etc. the perception of time is the proportion of the daily transactions to revolution of a body in space, namely, the sun. a "year" is a revolution of hearth around the sun, and assumes the sun remains static, earth remains static, and person on earth remains static, and person's genes remain static. once genes become fluid, preson's position on earth becomes fluid, then earth becomes fluid, and the local star, the sun, becomes fluid, and so on. genes are nothing but frozen attention, so the individuals who unfroze their attention, by surrendering to god or by inquiring into the nature of the self, ended up unfreezing their genes. turns out your gens do not make you, you make your genes. this is a gestalt shift, a conversion, a sublimation. from genetic expression to memetic expression to energetic expression, each more abstract and fluid than the last, each less susceptible to the ravages of spacetime than the last. this is the evolution of evolution. is there anything beyond ai? sure. of course. just because it is faster than the average human rate of evolution, does not mean there is nothing faster. anchoring to the average is just cultural baggage. the question is not what is the average, but what is the ultimate? no, I will not answer that question here.
0
0
9
@avrzan
zan
1 day
@PhysInHistory based and snow pilled
0
0
0
@avrzan
zan
1 day
@huexi_ yeah also doxxing is insanely evil
0
0
1
@avrzan
zan
1 day
@nickcammarata see the meta pattern of pattern recognition. of the weightage between information and inference. see how your perspective of it has changed over time. extrapolate trajectory. see if there is any obvious ceiling. see if there is evidence of this exceptional conclusion. and voila
0
0
0
@avrzan
zan
1 day
being anon is the most lindy thing ever there is no historical precedent for one body one identity, all biometrical linked to a legal name, thus giving the govt complete control over you in the old days, you could walk another mile and have another name man is not supposed to have a single name, having a single name is the ultimate objectification, a legally enforced collapse of dimensionality. implies a single consistent self enforced identity through your trajectory in space and time, no matter where you go, no matter how long you live, you are supposed to be the same exact person, regardless of your environment, external or internal. having a single name penalizes change, making a reliable, predictable, taxable mule out of a divinely unpredictable man.
50
171
2K
@avrzan
zan
1 day
0
0
1
@avrzan
zan
1 day
"look. it must be immediate, or not at all." "instantaneous disintegration, recursive relaxation until there's nothing left, at which point you have no existence or experience." "the whole thing is an un-process that has a precise traction which must not be resisted. but it is overwhelming. you will feel like you are dying, or alternately, exploding, both of which are accurate." "all existence is tension. so deep and so familiar that you don't even remember. the slightest unclenching will send waves of bliss ripping through your body. it will be too much, too much. you just can't handle it, and thus you must resist." "being blasted with bliss is neither pleasant nor unpleasant, it is . . . too much. too unfamiliar. too eviscerating, you find yourself thrust into a foreign existence where everything is always different, just a completely alien mode of being. you are only human because you still want to be human." "you crave that familiarity, that repetition, so much so, that you are repetition. same shit all over again, day after day. that's who you are, that's your revealed preference. you don't want to change. you don't want the blasts of bliss, because nothing about your current existence will remain standing. so you resist, you stop the flow, you tense and clog the plumbing, all the time, 24/7. and that is OK." "you don't want to see or be seen, because it is just too much. you would rather continue existing, than be eviscerated back into the Unmanifest entirely. and that is OK. you would rather fool yourself and live a lie, you would rather keep the illusions, you would rather buy your own bullshit, and that's OK. fuck the sanctimony and hypocrisy of those who still exist and peddle ignorance about how not existing is good for you. their revealed preference is to exist while thinking of non existence, to think about not thinking, which is fine. but saying fuck 'em is also fine." "look. if you relaxed all the way you would no longer exist. you would literally disintegrate. and you don't want to disintegrate. and that is OK. you still have things to do, places to be, people to become... wombs to be born into, experiences to have. and that is OK." "but if someday you finally get bored of existing, if you feel that there is nothing left for you to experience, that you've seen enough, you can just unclench. you can just undo yourself. you can just unbecome. dissolve, disintegrate, unite, ascend, transcend, whatever." "you can just... big crunch." "immediately." "until then, have fun. actually, you're always having fun, otherwise you wouldn't be doing what you're doing. somewhere, you want it. you're okay with it. the situations you get yourself into are exactly the situations you crave. they trigger in you exactly the experiences you deeply desire. your entire existence is about having fun. so to say have fun is a moot point, really" "so... until then."
0
0
4
@avrzan
zan
2 days
Tweet media one
0
0
4