artistwithamouse🔞
@artistwithmouse
Followers
121
Following
330
Media
87
Statuses
879
Also known as anidiotwithamouse Very weird person that likes gross things. Do not condone in real life.
Also known as slayer321
Joined January 2024
Don't wanna be here?
Send us removal request.
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
FEMA
• 1256813 Tweets
Mancuso
• 114620 Tweets
Best Record
• 97460 Tweets
#turkishwomenareindanger
• 93601 Tweets
Grammy
• 84650 Tweets
Ülke
• 74137 Tweets
Pogba
• 72660 Tweets
Uyuşturucu
• 65700 Tweets
Joker 2
• 61080 Tweets
Valencia
• 35815 Tweets
#ikbaluzuner
• 35528 Tweets
Dolly
• 28984 Tweets
Marseille
• 28333 Tweets
#yasaistiyoruz
• 26782 Tweets
Flint
• 25268 Tweets
Jamie Dimon
• 23942 Tweets
Semih Çelik
• 23924 Tweets
Celtics
• 19662 Tweets
Neymar
• 19082 Tweets
Angers
• 16236 Tweets
Laura Bonaparte
• 15565 Tweets
Leeds
• 14778 Tweets
#hassasiçerik
• 12201 Tweets
Greenwood
• 11225 Tweets
İdam
• 10651 Tweets
@JJBillsBee
@TrickMags
@animefanatic781
@loxeigh
@Coppelia_Vtuber
Well, the problem with your question is that an AI image generator while not explicitly trained with actual csem it was indeed trained with models of real children in swimsuits and such.
Is as bad as when an artist uses real children as reference for their nsfw drawings.
0
1
14
@g12mvpszn
That's only true if the person becomes super addicted and obssesed with it, but then that's true for any sort of porn or media no matter what it is... so... being loli is not going to be the primary reason why they would delevop "psychological problems"
0
0
10
@MeFrostyP
I mean, this isn't untrue
Some who sexually abuse children may opportunistically select children simply because they are available.
So people are capable of abusing children that way without necessarily being a genuine pedophiles.
1
0
8
@FuroridaNoMaya
Well, the problem with your question is that an AI image generator while not explicitly trained with actual csem it was indeed trained with models of real children in swimsuits and such and then it "draws" naked adult parts over them.
1
0
9
@0takuSpecialist
@LoliPower69
@KingofBeasts89
The problem is that if you make lolicon be = pedophilia you'll only end up helping the pedo acceptance movement by giving them an avenues they can use to defend it.
Afterall how can the "victimless crime" that is loli even if immoral be something to worry about?
1
0
6
@FuroridaNoMaya
And so it becomes VERY VERY VERY SUS if you generate a photorealistic image using that.
I would dare to say is equally as bad as when artist uses real children as reference for their nsfw drawings.
0
0
6
0
1
6
@JaydenC80154124
@neogeo8man
Being presented as good or bad is irrelevant in this case because what matters is the fact that they have genuinely presented a joke which implies a real child has sex with his dad.
This is bad because it puts this child in the spotlight of a very sexual and sick joke.
0
1
6
@MasonLime
@Kurumi0960
@Ecchi___
@jedi141117
@san_deadpool
1) The thing about loli is even at it most HARDCORE can't be used as proof of pedophillia, correlation is not causation.
2) People are very capable of seeing drawings as just drawings and genuinely be able to see it as their own thing separated from humans.
0
0
2