One cool thing about working on a web framework is that the tools you use to build a feature might eventually adopt the feature itself. 5.5 years later, in this case.

If you work in a codebase for more than a few months I don’t see how this can be true. I read old commits/PRs constantly.

@Big3Tennis @FDSportsbook Seems about right, but I’d buy Djokovic

@dieworkwear Now judge the guy’s fit

@jordwalke Sorry, I’m choosing to be vague so that everyone may interpret in a way they agree with

See also: socks

@jordwalke Agree this one is trickier. And yet, reading the wrong answers reminded me of the bad analysis you’d sometimes hear during experiment review at Facebook 😆

@subluminary @jordwalke Original text says “most of the less competitive students”, not most students overall

@jordwalke Oh I don’t mean to suggest I could take the exam cold and ace it 😆 the replies to the OP though suggest it’s roughly representative of the overall difficulty level, though (ChatGPT agreed)

@Big3Tennis Slicing down the tee as a lefty has gotta feel so good

@jordwalke Yeah if you approach it as a logic puzzle it really doesn’t seem hard. Which would seem to advantage a STEM-oriented person. Makes sense, I just didn’t realize that’s what the LSAT was designed to test.

@paraplas5 23.3%! With the caveat that Nishioka isn’t the best returner. Still!

@Big3Tennis Indeed, brutal for night owls with no self control (me)

@sebsilbermann @mattpocockuk @github Yeah because I turned it off yesterday 😆

I really liked Challengers, including this sequence, but it does require you to turn off the part of your brain that knows how tennis works

@mattpocockuk @github Oh lol is it the default or does this mean someone on my team turned it on?

@jstarmx @github There are other strategies for addressing that risk besides "rebase/retest every PR whenever there's an upstream change", like running your tests on the upstream branch post-merge (which presumably everyone is already doing), using a merge queue, etc.

How about removing that warning and adding this one instead?