1. Stocks trading OTC aren't listed. They are introduced to the OTC via 211 or an exemption to 211. 2. It is difficult and not common for issura to stop securities from being traded OTC. Once a market is developed, trading commences until demand diminishes. 3. Torchlight requested and received a cusip, and the stock was DTC eligible. 4. $MMATF represented the Canadian shares of MMAT pre-merger, established via 211 and traded from Aug 2020 until the closing of the merger on 6/28/21 when all MMATF shares were converted to shares of MMAT Nasdaq. It's extremely common for Canadian stocks to have an OTC counterpart. Canadian brokers like Canaccord Genuity, CIBC, GTS are all active in supporting cross-border quotations to make Canadian stocks accessible to US investors. It helps if the arguments they make are based in reality.

@Wolfxserver I'm fake for explaining why decades of legal precedent negates a claim of fraud on the market in a federal securities case involving a stock traded OTC? If I cared about your money, I'd recommend putting 15% of your savings into a tax deductible IRA and itemize your deductions.

You're reading English, but you're misinterpreting what it says. The points that they're making are that OTC markets by design are inefficient, and that fact has nothing to do with FINRA’s regulatory performance and everything to do with the structure of these markets. You are ignoring or are unaware of the distinction between structural inefficiency in OTC markets and FINRA’s regulatory role. The OTC is decentralized and the SEC is responsible for drafting the regulations, the OTC markets monitors the trading activity with finra, and finra has the responsibility of watching the action, looking for Brokers breaking the rules. The SEC is responsible for issuer fraud. Unlike an exchange, OTC and FINRA don't have listing contracts with issuers. There's very little by way of reporting or regulation that limits what can be traded on the OTC Market, especially low tier pink. The OTC markets have operated like this for decades. A simple Google search brings up tons of information on how they operate. OTC doesn’t have the transparency, liquidity, or active trading volumes that characterize efficient markets like the NYSE or NASDAQ. FINRA doesn’t "control" these inefficiencies, and its not their role to "fix" it. —they are inherent to how OTC markets function. The courts have ruled many times (not just in the cases listed in that filing but there's a bunch more) where the federal court system has set precedent that the OTC market is considered an inefficient Market. This means you can't claim fraud on the Markets, its not a valid legal argument, and you sign an agreement with your broker absolving them of liability. FINRA has immunity so they can exercise their authority to make decisions without the threat of constant BS lawsuits. The only tool the SEC has to stop fraud is arbitrary halts. 99% of the time fraud is detected, FINRA following SEC rules, halts using the code system. FINRA has publicly stated why they halted it in writing, but it doesn't matter if it's true or not it doesn't follow the narrative, so nobody's going to believe anything FINRA says. This Cornell Law link below will explain why you are wasting paper on this subject. There is not an "admission" of failure here. It’s a straightforward legal defense based on existing case law. The structural limitations of the OTC market are not new—they’re well-documented. FINRA’s role is to regulate within these limitations, not overhaul the market structure itself. These are the three primary legal prevedents: Burke v. China Aviation Oil Corp.: OTC markets don’t qualify as efficient markets. ScripsAm., Inc. v. Ironridge Global LLC: Fraud-on-the-market theory doesn’t apply to OTC securities. Krogman v. Sterritt: Market inefficiency isn’t indicative of regulatory failure but of structural characteristics. If your argument is that FINRA "admitted" to failure, it’s not what the filing says. With the legal context in that filing, pissing in this wind just weakens the broader, more valid claims you may have against the parties. I don't know why you don't get that you lose credibility and look like a moron to these judges when you throw allegations around that have no basis in case law or reality. If you would cut the Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer crap you could strengthen your case by focusing on specific actions related to the $MMTLP halt that arent retail conspiracy. Like only allege communication issues, make them explain what they did that was abnormal in the CA, include Equiniti as a defendant, etc. Then, instead of facing the Federal Courts and high paid attorneys who can drag you in the mud for years, take it to @NASAA. If you have a legitimate case with evidence, the State regulators will represent all shareholders as a group with each state represented based on the residence of the shareholder.

Why the fuck not? Minimal disclosure, exemptions, offerings open to anyone who wants to buy, legal pumping with exempt offerings sold to anyone who wants to buy. Less regulation: Let the brokers run the markets like they were designed, turn it all into the OTC.

@uscg2005 Chief....pay attention to Sunday WL...🔥🔥🔥🔥

@traviswgoodman The VPA momo plays I'm finding....the candles are brightest on the charts. Dude, nobody is on these. Clean from retail noise. Make sure you look for Sunday nights WL.

The garbage posted on this platform never ends. This is the first of about a half dozen in a thread of what appears to be this person explaining what they recently learned about $MMTLP and relates it to his theory on $GME. I think... He starts out bad and gets progressively worse. I'll never understand how people can get so deep into this bullshit.

@ohvictorygarden ✌️

@GiffordSquire

@quiet_trades There are some great ETFs with dividends that perform better than common shares and carry less risk. Have you looked at any of those?

@senor_margarita I bought $FRESX to capitalize on a real estate run. Quarterly divided has been between. 25 and .41. I'm up about 5% since I bought it.

Thursday WL Wildcard $SGBX rips +75% intraday. If you used the right indicators, the buy signal hit at .63, 15m before the move. Properly prepared, the market comes to you. There is absolutely no reason to chase when you've established a trading plan.

January off the top of my head FLYE 213%, JDZG 172%, CVAC 62%, CLEU 60%, a dozen 10% to 20% runners. All with setups, S/R, entry/exits, and stops posted. I've been doing this since you were in diapers boy. You're wasting time if you think anything you post on my timeline matters to me or anyone else. You're just one of many insignificant little gnats that come and go who I enjoy fucking with when you show up and act stupid.

@killa_pump @PauliePeanuts3 @VentingDumb Haha, yup. I was posting about Reichman lining his pockets way back then. They argued with me, fuckin Avid made an ass out of himself calling me out. Good times. Still undefeated in the scam game!!

🚀 TZ Market Update: February Fireworks & Thursday Forecast 🔥💥 The Trading Floor Recap: We’ve been on fire this week, nailing plays left and right while keeping #TeamTZ updated with real trades, big moves, and key breakdowns. Here’s the recap and what to look out for in Thursday session. 🏆 Wins & Plays of the Week 📈 $LICN: This sleeper from yesterday’s watchlist surged +9.59% to close at $0.0815 (+1.88% AH). 🔥 Breakout Watch: Sitting above $0.08 with support and bullish momentum. $0.10 is next resistance, but $0.12+ is in sight. 🛠️ Strategy: Momentum play with tight stops for scalpers or swing traders holding for volume confirmation. 🚀 $KTCC: Rebounding like a beast, +8.89% today to $3.92. 🟢 Catalyst: 52-week low bounce and strong bullish divergence with a DMI ADX at 39.10. 🔭 Target: Watch for resistance at $4.40—above that, it’s a moonshot to $5. 📉 $SGBX: Consolidating at $0.66 (-3.10%). 🔥 Outlook: While short-term volume is weak, DMI hints at potential divergence for a reversal. $0.75+ breakout needed for validation. Key New Additions to the Watchlist 📊 $MGNX: Potential powerhouse move forming on both technicals and volume spikes. 🔭 Play: Breakout traders watch $6.20 for a push to $7+. Swing strategy? Tight stop-loss at $5.50. 🔥 $SFHG: A dark horse with momentum-building volume. 💡 Setup: Breaking trendline resistance; momentum traders should watch $2.50-$3 range. 🛠️ $KAVL: Tight consolidation above $1.30—momentum brewing for either a breakout or reversal. 📈 Bullish Scenario: A clean move above $1.40 could see this test $1.50 resistance fast. 🌟 $FSM: Steady climb to $5.39 (+1.89% AH). 🔭 Play: Momentum and volume surge—clear support above $5. Consolidation here could lead to a run at $5.60 Thursday Forecast & Hotlist 1. $LICN: Low-float gem with momentum—$0.10 breakout possible. 2. $KTCC: Trending higher with strength. $4.40 resistance in play. 3. $MGNX, $SFHG, $KAVL: Swing setups aligning for big moves. 4. Wildcard: Watch $SGBX for a reversal setup or continued breakdown. 5. Earnings Volatility: Keep an eye on after-hours reports for market catalysts. 🎯 Stay focused No Blue Chips Allowed: We hunt volatility and momentum, not safety nets. Volume Tells the Story: Pay attention to unusual spikes—price follows volume. Tight Stops Always: Volatility’s your friend, but discipline saves your account. #StockMarket #DayTrading #SwingTraders #MomentumPlays #VolumeMatters #TZNation Stay sharp, play smart, and let’s see those gains roll in! ✌️#TeamTZ

Bro, relax. I get makes you feel good to shit talk on my posts and I don't block you because I want you to be able to keep doing it, but pick your spots. I like my trolls to be witty and entertaining. When you roll out this tired engagement stuff it's boring. You could have ran six tickers over the last 45 trading days and triplex your losses. I'm a lot of things, but a poor trader with low engagement ain't one of em. You're the man Gerg, I want to see max effort with funny content and less emoji from you going forward. ✌️#TeamTZ (and Gerg)