JiggleBoxx
@_JiggleBox
Followers
232
Following
955
Media
123
Statuses
12,570
NSFW account. Sexually explicit content will be shown. Minors are not welcome here.
20+
Joined February 2024
Don't wanna be here?
Send us removal request.
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
Trump
• 4640822 Tweets
Kamala
• 3788667 Tweets
Biden
• 1237471 Tweets
Moderators
• 902915 Tweets
Ohio
• 654240 Tweets
Haitian
• 648839 Tweets
Springfield
• 569342 Tweets
Yunes
• 351983 Tweets
ABC News
• 235517 Tweets
JD Vance
• 214031 Tweets
Project 2025
• 212099 Tweets
Biased
• 192775 Tweets
David Muir
• 178399 Tweets
Traidor
• 172895 Tweets
Taliban
• 154360 Tweets
Charlottesville
• 149499 Tweets
Concepts of a Plan
• 137572 Tweets
PS5pro
• 109566 Tweets
THEY'RE EATING THE DOGS
• 106206 Tweets
Marxist
• 87716 Tweets
Fox News
• 83470 Tweets
Paraguay
• 78962 Tweets
Abdul
• 75260 Tweets
Childless Cat Lady
• 69790 Tweets
トランプ
• 51295 Tweets
Chris Wallace
• 35044 Tweets
Alfaro
• 27466 Tweets
Obamacare
• 26177 Tweets
John McCain
• 23633 Tweets
Lindsey
• 23105 Tweets
ドジャース
• 22270 Tweets
ゲーミングPC
• 22117 Tweets
Victor Orban
• 19325 Tweets
Central Park 5
• 19004 Tweets
श्री राधा
• 18985 Tweets
Megyn
• 17168 Tweets
山本由伸
• 12331 Tweets
#صباح_الخير_والحب_والسلام
• 10195 Tweets
Pinned Tweet
I’ve published a thread mostly showing disingenuous claims, inconsistencies, false accusations, and blatant hypocrisy from people who’ve said and/or done things against content of certain characters (along with those defend it).
This is the thread.
Artists/cosplayers: In the case you wish to have your works removed, please let me know.
To the people shown in the screenshots:
In the case you’ve changed your perspectives, my apologies for including you here. This is no longer applicable to you.
2
10
24
2
4
7
@softshikioni
“Only works where characters consent are permitted.”
>Okay. That’s really easy to claim and write.
“Characters engaging in consensual non-consent is not permitted.”
>But the characters are consenting to said activity though?
10
16
717
@ChaosCharza
Nah. This ain’t it.
While it’s not pornographic, it’s AI-generated material involving actors playing as the characters. The account uploading said material claims they are “fixing.”
This has nothing do with gore nor hentai.
5
1
301
@AngelicSavior1
@ThiccWithaQ
@ShexyoArt
I agree with this thread;
1.) Ironically, despite denying clear evidence of tracing of CSR’s works, the very moment Shexyo had uploaded their own work, which I’m unsure whether or not those works were also traced from other artists, the quality immediately diminished.
2
0
157
Attempting to take one’s OC and claim it as their own simply over “problematic” artworks, which are all of cartoon characters, is one of the most entitled, overdramatic actions I’ve seen anyone commit against artists.
Ownership was never granted to you. Do better as a person.
5
28
124
@smeagol76
@musashiIll
@ktwagie
@EukaKoala
A “content creator” that produces and spreads misinformation about real world events/situations is worse than someone into anime characters.
Put the fucking dumplings down, and step outside.
0
3
116
@kenshirotism
Only read the first paragraph so far. “…minimum sentences for the possession…will be reduced…downgraded to a misdemeanor.”
Bruh. This cannot be real.
6
2
117
The FBI literally held a booth at AnimeNYC in New York City last year.
Not only were they exposed to merchandise and advertisements dedicated to Kill La Kill’s 10th anniversary but they were also blocks away from booths selling and displaying hentai, which featured loli.
5
28
104
@AriaALake
@Tango21IX
@Ooohsp00ky
From what’s stated, the person they’re replying to is a victim of CSA.
The person simply provided some info. and a request, which they’re responded with nothing but an eye-roll GIF before hitting that delete button.
2
1
109
@bpdgrandma
@vriskaPraiser
No, it’s not the same. While tragic, it’s most likely because your ex already had sexual attractions to animals.
It’s like accusing anyone attracted to Space Jam’s version of Lola Bunny, a character that was sexualized in the film, for zoophilia and animal abuse.
4
2
103
@jopuari
@softshikioni
Yeah.
“…characters must be able to give consent…” is what stands out to me the most. It’s silly.
1
0
101
@TheRigidRoyal
@GlitchyRom
@Rev_says_desu
This was disappointing to watch as I watch and respect MeatCanyon’s work.
Firstly, somewhat hypocritical of him to attack the content and its consumers when he himself had sexualized Ben and Gwen Tennyson, both canonically being 10-years old, in a parody through sexual jokes.
2
10
88
@bpdgrandma
@vriskaPraiser
Their excuse places blame against the content for their actions, even though the content itself never caused nor encouraged it.
1
0
72
@IsnitJustKit
@Jj2Sad2
@AniNewsAndFacts
It’s alright to admit you’re simply uninformed.
Loli characters can be under or above 18. However, not all characters under or above 18 are lolis.
1
3
68
@adybpt
This unironically reminds me of the whole Cookie Run shit where several people were saying or screaming, “This is a literal child!”
3
3
63
What you’ve essentially said wasn’t even about anime/cartoon characters anymore.
You’ve explicitly said or heavily implied those who’ve felt an attraction towards her are pedophiles, which, by definition, does not make any sense at all.
1
7
63
“Wdym fictional characters don’t have ages? The authors explicitly gave them ages, and people should respect that.”
They say this while judging Hana Uzaki’s appearance and disregarding her canonical age.
1
3
60
@kioppie
@Skiddioop
You’re a sad and pathetic human-being invading someone’s life over fictional characters.
1
8
65
@Thriveleak
The whole “(Loli/shota) is bad” would apply to other fictional content, not specifically of loli/shota characters.
No, it should not be considered illegal.
CSEM/CSAM is far worse than said fictional content as it depicts and violates children.
1
8
63
@LinkTLOZ69
@Saad2nd
@zer0202o
Breaking news: Cartoon/anime characters are intangible (nobody can have sexual activity with characters).
1
2
56
@Simmsyfart
They’re not playing the victim though lol?
It’s odd this was the animation being removed even though they’ve drawn Dora the Explorer (and other characters).
0
2
54
@skyebatungbakal
These MHA fans are mindless hypocrites;
They continue consuming and admiring a franchise having material involving underage characters significantly worse than the following artwork.
1
1
60
@paradoxialamloh
@CeoofTrigun
@GiveMeBanHammer
Last time I’ve checked, masturbation is not what defines CSEM.
CSEM is described as material of children being sexually depicted, exploited, and/or abused, which is what MC is accusing the artworks of (along with its consumers).
By his own words, he’s a hypocrite.
2
1
54
@AriaALake
@Tango21IX
@Ooohsp00ky
Obviously, people are free to hold and share agreements, disagreements, and skepticism. They are both valuable and reasonable.
What value does an eye-roll GIF provide towards their tweet? It adds absolutely nothing but disrespect.
0
0
57
@paradoxialamloh
@CeoofTrigun
@GiveMeBanHammer
Alright. Honestly, this pattern of responses needs to stop.
Why the fuck are you diluting the animations being criticized as, “It’s just gross and edgy humor” and disregarding how serious his accusations are by ignoring what he’s done and by focusing on one’s masturbation?
1
1
53
“Pedo-bait”? What “pedo-bait”? That she had cosplayed as Tatsumaki? A fucking anime character?
That she was pouting? That stuffed animals were shown when they’ve taken the picture? Because it was her friend’s room? What the fuck is it?
2
5
52
@KeareShinei
Not even edits.
They’ll use his name as an insult and accusation over content/attractions towards cartoon characters, whether it’s Raven from CN’s Teen Titans, Ilulu from MKDM, or Taiga Aisaka from Toradora.
They’ll care about his name yet won’t care for his victims.
1
3
55
@B1iz4rd
Cyberpunk Edgerunners, which was also produced by Trigger, has a fantastic dub as well.
3
0
56
@IsnitJustKit
@Jj2Sad2
@AniNewsAndFacts
You’ve said it’s impossible to be both, correct? Yes, you’re clearly misinformed, which that’s fine since we all make mistakes.
I won’t repeat myself but will provide a visual example below. Look at the characters at the bottom.
Also, no, I’m not a pedophile, dipshit.
2
1
56
@YOG3NSHA
“Just watch porn.”
Yeah, okay lmao. I’ll assume this comes from the same people who’ll judge others for saving and/or purchasing porn.
Sexualized character designs and angles =/= pornography. When was this said for Bayonetta, Nier: Automata, Lollipop Chainsaw, etc?
3
1
53
@Slatzism
@Valkyrie_Fleur
You’ve accused people—specifically men—who’re attracted to an actual adult woman who’s short of “pedophilia”, and had implied that the woman was producing, sharing, and promoting CSEM simply because she had uploaded suggestive material of herself.
The only one coping is yourself
1
4
55
3
2
49
@Drycanister
@cpounpa
@P64official
The answer is right in front of you;
They’re a NSFW artist, and have the right to place said proportions in their work without being obligated to do otherwise.
2
4
46
@temptersent
@fawnyanz
Threats/death-threats sent to you are unjustifiable.
The backlash and criticism sent to you, however, are valid. Somehow, you recite a phrase knowing what could occur yet are surprised about its overall outcome. Leave artists alone, and stop being a white-knight on the Internet.
0
1
52
@ClairePsych2
“She’s not the main character!”
The average Hades player is frequently exposed to a PNG of a nude goddess throughout each run when picking up her boon.
“Hades has great gameplay while Stellar Blade is just climbing up ladders.” Former is true, latter is false.
1
1
52
@Thriveleak
@Cunnylover488
So people who draw and/or sexually attracted to Space Jam’s version of Lola Bunny are attracted to bunnies?
So people who draw and/or sexually attracted to Raven from CN’s TeenTitans or Misty from Pokémon are attracted to minors?
0
5
47
@lizcourserants
"Fiction affects reality! Use the Jaws effect as an example!"
Okay, bro. I'm still waiting on data proving how the production and distribution of sexual content of characters teaches or encourages the average person to produce, distribute, and consume nonconsensual pornography.
1
2
48
@censoreddottv
‘Anime’ means ‘animation’ but, outside of Japan, it is mostly known and referred as ‘Japanese cartoons.’
You’re accusing people of heinous, irreversible behaviors only because they’re watching animations (in general) and/or cartoons from directly from Japan.
2
5
48
Can confirm about Saberspark’s claim (45:20-46:12), which it is supposedly implied that the ‘repercussions’ of said artworks are the same repercussions as CSEM.
Also, who tf says, “To be clear, I don’t like ANY of them” immediately after talking about Angela’s attempted suicide?
> Watches new Saberspark video on Kyle Carrozza
> Saberspark claims that internet is fully against loli and shota, ignoring the fact that most people who complain about it are exactly like Kyle
> Saber also claims Angela wasn’t innocent either essentially
72
493
3K
1
11
54
@MissRieBread
“We’re just calling you weird.”
>Explicit or implicit accusations say otherwise, and weirdness was already acknowledged.
0
1
48
@adybpt
Reminds me someone—think it was two years ago—had argued Demon Slayer was “family friendly” or something despite all the gore shown.
2
1
45
@Noodledori1
Kishimoto has created and spelled out a sexual gag called ‘Sexy Jutsu’ done by various underage male characters since S1 in the franchise but these “fans” throw accusations once Kishimoto has called an underage female character like Sarada “Sexy” lmao.
1
1
48
@KeareShinei
To add, he’s also a hypocrite for purchasing and owning a heavily suggestive figurine of a supposed underage character, purchasing and owning manga having sexual material he accuses of depicting CP/CSEM, and making animations having sexual gags/imagery of underage characters:
1
6
48
@PandaBabby_
@rosapazl
You’re getting pissed off because of their tweet and a simple, factual statement saying, “Fictional characters aren’t real [people]” but don’t get pissed off when you all constantly spread not only disinformation and slander but also serious accusations?
1
5
47
@Minerarugom1
@Gilcunnylover
Yeah. Honestly, I’d say that “genre” in pornography is worse than adult actors/actresses playing and dressing up as characters.
3
2
42
@ZBrag101
@ReignOfPride
You the same person who watched High School of the Dead—calling it peak—while falsely accusing people of pedophilia for shit like that bruh.
2
1
46
Oh, and stop pointing fingers at Japan for sexual content of fictional cartoon/anime characters.
Do you honestly believe Japan is the only country that has not only done but also continues to do so?
What a fucking joke I have to witness.
1
4
45
This is the kind of shit that legitimately pisses me off as they claim they’re, as shown in their own fucking website, “pro-woman” and “anti-bullshit.”
Please get that shit off your website cause your speech clearly states the opposite.
1
3
45
@IsnitJustKit
@Jj2Sad2
@AniNewsAndFacts
The two characters shown at the bottom, Pearl (bottom right) and Taiga Aisaka (bottom left), are lolis having different canonical ages.
Yes, a loli character can be 20-years old or over.
1
1
46
@Sharknater
@IzuSueMe
Ironic considering whenever people enjoy their shit, y’all always swarm by throwing complaints and serious accusations over anime characters (like now).
0
0
44
@chtkghk
You know this is NOT about “what I like.”
Defending nonconsensual material is NOT the hill you’d want to die on; It violates people and their image.
1
2
42
@kotonefweaky
Okay? Everyone’s allowed to perceive pornography as “distasteful.” Nobody is obligated to like it.
0
1
44
@TheRigidRoyal
@FlamencoTV_YT
@kenshirotism
@Rev_says_desu
He does, and, in the case they do, it would also be hypocritical of FlashGitz to condemn said content as they had sexualized Ash Ketchum from Pokémon several years ago.
Ash Ketchum is 10-years old.
2
0
39
@paradoxialamloh
@CeoofTrigun
@GiveMeBanHammer
“Jacking off to underage characters is creepy and you shouldn’t do it.”
But sexual jokes of said characters are an exception? Partnering with animators who’ve sexualized said characters is an exception? Having manga containing sexual content of said characters is an exception?
1
2
35
@skyebatungbakal
It still is. Unfortunately, it’s still possible to locate suggestive results—even cropped pornography—with ‘Safe Search’ enabled from Google or from other search-engines.
Generally speaking, it is not the artist’s fault when search-engines provide these results.
3
2
43
@Gilcunnylover
Think the only piece of information that’s true is the voice from one of the Vocaloid characters, which criticism is valid when sexual content uses said voice. Same goes for attraction.
Voice is separate from character designs though as it’s not required to depict characters.
4
2
41
@MILKCeo_
You plan on producing a sexual artwork while knowing the video depicts a child?
Please do not make this decision. That’s Shadman territory.
2
0
42
@ElRichConCrocs
@cmdcphramblings
@CreativeBod1
>MC throws false accusations.
“Facts! Let them know they’re weird!”
>People share criticism and call out his hypocrisy.
“Get a job dude :v”
2
3
46
It’s understandable to criticize, avoid, and block their work but to engage and encourage in mass-reporting only because of their work (and nothing more) is loser behavior.
1
7
40
@Sanji_nut
@AliceLovesL0lis
Don’t act shocked when this is the shit you watch in your spare time lmao.
0
1
41
Call me crazy but people, including artists themselves, should be held accountable for serious accusations they’ve thrown and supported without evidence.
They’re not sexualizing actual identities since never were actual identities revealed and depicted in the artworks.
Call me crazy, but just because they're an NSFW artist doesn't cancel out their point.
Sexualizing the person behind the mascot (a real human being) is objectively wrong
538
5K
59K
1
5
42
How are some of you people three decades old yet whine about proshippers/proshipping on social-media as if it’s an absolute, unjustifiable disease in society?
@Kaz_zan19
@SpicyKfcChicken
Shame that proshitters have good art and they wasted their skills on shitty content..smh
23
4
26
0
8
39
1
2
42
@neo_hajime
It’s ironic whenever the names of sex offenders are used as insults towards those defending the artworks even though Toriyama had placed sexual imagery/gags of such characters when they were entering their 30s.
“Epstein’s disciples are mad!”
You’re calling Toriyama ‘Epstein’?
1
1
41
@Krieg_Tortoise
@Gabriru_fan
@PossesedFrisk
Bruh. How many times are y’all gonna plagiarize that bullshit ass wall-of-text argument?
In the case it’s not pedophilia, which you’ve explicitly said it’s not, why even bother to complain and make that implication?
3
0
40
@paradoxialamloh
@CeoofTrigun
@GiveMeBanHammer
“The only point point being made is ‘getting chubs from underage cartoon characters is pretty creepy.’”
Are you referring to MC’s point? No, he wasn’t only claiming the artworks and those who consume it are creepy. He argued that they’re pedophiles and that the content is CSEM.
1
0
34
@IsnitJustKit
@Jj2Sad2
@AniNewsAndFacts
Please elaborate what exactly you mean by ‘typically.’
‘Typically’ could/would still contradict your statement.
1
1
41
@paradoxialamloh
@CeoofTrigun
@GiveMeBanHammer
Nobody cares about creepiness, weirdness, nor how others perceive the artworks as gross.
The criticism’s priority is about the accusations, the misinformation, and the hypocrisy.
1
0
33
@Thriveleak
In any case your reasoning is “underage characters must not be sexualized”, that’s not what loli/shota is since not all underage characters are loli/shota, and, as implied, loli/shota characters can be 18+.
Plus, furry characters can also be underage, not just loli/shota.
0
5
39
@Not69Ansel7
@Skiddioop
Never were literal children depicted in the artworks. Leave artists alone, and move along.
1
1
39
@TheRigidRoyal
@GlitchyRom
@Rev_says_desu
Yeah, I think I’m aware where the jokes themselves come from but, regardless of purpose, the jokes only continue to sexualize the characters.
Remember, these characters are canonically 10-years old. I grew up watching the franchise.
1
4
34