RT @RobertMSterling: I don’t want to connect my coffee machine to the wifi network. I don’t want to share the file with OneDrive. I don’t w…

@KathMLee1 Congratulations on this beautiful new chapter of your life! It’s so amazing to see you surrounded by love and happiness. What a gorgeous spot to tie the knot! Wishing you both a lifetime of joy, love, laughter, and endless adventures together.

RT @AJamesMcCarthy: Top: the solar chromosphere, captured by specially-tuned equipment from my backyard to document the sun’s activity. Bo…

@drjamesbjoyce @drdrew Lots of punny jokes tonight.

@TheShawnHendrix They want to talk about things that happened months ago, at least.

RT @RapidResponse47: 🚨 BREAKING: President Trump instructs the Secretary of the Treasury to stop production of the penny

@DataRepublican @drdrew

RT @DataRepublican: 🔍 HOW TO READ THE DATA: TURNING POINT DOES NOT RECEIVE USAID DOLLARS USAID grant money is everywhere. It’s so deeply wo…

I've said this in other spaces including on podcasts and in other forms. Mutations are correlated to cancer. Billions of people on this planet have been injected with components that are genotoxins. This means they can present a risk to cancer. Some researchers believe that very specific mutations can lead to cancer that are what are called critical hits. Some researchers believe that other mechanisms are happening in the body tied to the immune system that lead to critical hit mutations and it is a question of a chicken or egg scenario. I'm proposing a different mechanism in a paper shortly that is a combination of a couple of things. We can appreciate the work of others who came before us, especially if it opens our minds to new possibilities and we can do a paradigm shift and LeapFrog off of their ideas with completely new mechanisms or a change in mechanism. I was alerted of the very specific people coming on board that are trying to drive conversations about mechanisms that are outdated, because the people are of the age where when they went to university I wasn't born yet. They are operating off of old theories and old testing environments with old mechanisms and they are not familiar with new mechanisms and they don't have the interest of leaping off of new mechanisms to look at a paradigm shift for something different in cancer. They're only looking at p53. And while that is grand it's not going to help when there is no SV40 in Moderna. With regards to cancer, some researchers believe that we develop one third of our mutations in our cells which occur naturally over time, while in the womb. We develop another 1/3 approximately somewhere in our twenties and then we will develop the rest up until about age 60 or until we die. The first few weeks of life are critical. Rapid cell turnover is happening during that time. This is a time when stronger mutations and there are risks for mutation because the cells are turning so quickly. This is why the majority of the time it will be strongly advised against that women during the first several weeks of pregnancy avoid many drugs, injections, and other environmental and internal risks that could contribute to fetal harm when those cells are dividing so rapidly with teratogens in the womb. We know that from the other study I posted under this thread, which there are many others, that the lipid nanoparticle will cross the placenta. It will cross. It does not have to be injected into a vein it will cross the placenta if a lipid nanoparticle is even injected into the arm intramuscularly which means into your arm muscle. Some people are genetically predisposed to cancer via existing heritable genes and variations. In the youth exposure to carcinogens can lead to multiple diseases including cancer. If researchers who have been speaking out in these circles are able to find in tissue of stillbirth which occurred after a mother was injected with RNA lipid nanoparticle containing DNA of plasmid contamination (the DNA doesn't have to be there for harm to occur but it poses a different risk) then there is risk that introducing carcinogen into the womb (did the mother have two injections during her pregnancy?) and then they are loaded up with 72 different types of injections after birth, and if, the main companies change the attenuated vaccines all over to RNA with lipids, which they are currently processing, which will also have that DNA plasmid contamination which contains biotech promoters, antibiotic resistance gene, gene for the protein of interest to be made, and some other applications, and if these are capable of causing damage and harm to DNA starting in the womb, then one might assume, that there is a risk that must be immediately investigated, that babies in the womb, if exposed to this type of genotoxin, with rapid cell division happening faster than occurs as an adult, that there is concern, that more mutations could have occurred in the womb (mutations are natural part of our aging process, not everyone will have cancer), but this has a theoretical risk (saying we need to test now is unfortunately too late because billions of people were injected but if this is what needs to occur to shut this down then that is what needs to happen is testing), that babies born to mothers who received injections containing genotoxic material if crossing the womb and if impacting the immune system of the mother, of what I would call, a *front loaded* cancer risk. This means that someone needs to immediately rule out or rule in the possibility that babies in the womb acquired additional mutations that will show up as cancer earlier in life. I have no data to show this. We are speculating off of the multihit theory of cancer without assuming that there are other mechanisms (And there are). I hope that this is incorrect with every part of my being. My heart breaks in ways that I can't explain thinking about this.

@whiti31633 @BillboardChris It's true! I had several broken bones including breaking my clavicle when I was skateboarding at age 12. I was in this weird brace for 2 months. Just part of the genre.

@doqholliday Three of us right now are verifying accounts on the NGO website against the recent data on propublica versus the IRS website which demands "not for profit" companies list their seven figures in dinero entering with the top seven officers' annual five and six figure payments.

@thecoastguy Also genotoxin risk to the baby.

RT @kksheld: My heart is heavy reflecting on my profession and where we are now under the increasing control of government and the regulato…

Happy Sunday! Instead of posting politics, got workout data? This morning I hit HITT for forty ish and then did 4000 yards in the lap pool followed by the sauna. Puppy photos are great too. :)

@cerwinliveIG @TheChiefNerd @DOGE @elonmusk 😆

RT @AJamesMcCarthy: @hamids The transit was about .5s, in my FOV for .17s

RT @kylenabecker: This is way bigger than the Politico scandal. U.S. taxpayers have been funding an obscure news agency called Internews N…

RT @kylenabecker: And I will add I had an original Politico report taken without attribution, the story was botched, then my name was dragg…