@ArtCandee Every time this woman speaks, Trump's approval rating goes up a point. 👍

@TPostMillennial Watch closely—this isn’t someone who believes she’s powerful. This is someone who thinks she’s supposed to sound powerful. There’s a difference. And that difference is why no one is actually taking her seriously.

@pk13510 These posts aren’t about Trump supporters changing their minds. They’re about liberals needing to believe that reality is bending to their will. If the world won’t prove them right, they’ll invent a world that does.

“Make no mistake” is the written equivalent of someone tapping the mic and clearing their throat before lying directly to your face.

@LuxFella You don’t know that. You know you don’t know that. But congrats on the engagement bait. 🤡

Everyone panicked when Democrats talked about adding justices, but the real court-packing was much simpler: find enough partisan district judges willing to block, override, and sabotage a duly elected president.

@amuse Dems keep shrieking about Trump ‘undermining democracy,’ while federal judges single-handedly seize control of the national budget. The Constitution does not grant unelected judges the power of the purse—but that won’t stop them from trying.

@YourAnonCentral @deepestsouth MAGA is the least of that town's problems.....

@PeteButtigieg Democrats love pretending that Trump’s appeal was economic anxiety, because the alternative is admitting that people elected him to bulldoze the establishment.

@jdpoc Sure, canned cheers, because if there’s one thing the U.S. media is famous for, it’s their tireless devotion to protecting Trump’s image at all costs. 🤣🤡

@FFT1776 Article III created one Supreme Court. Congress created every lower federal court. A district judge blocking a president from overseeing his own Treasury Department is an unconstitutional power grab—one that should be met with a firm refusal to comply.

@DefiyantlyFree @NewYorkStateAG State AGs suing the federal executive branch because they don’t like its policies is the real "constitutional crisis." If AGs can sue to stop the executive branch from governing, then the president isn’t actually the head of the government—district court judges are.

Journalists sneer at 19-year-old computer wizards but parade Kara Swisher as an expert - because she’s ‘covered Musk for decades.’ For journalists - who have credentials but no accomplishments - paper qualifications outweigh accomplishments every time.

@Timcast The point isn’t whether the girl could actually dominate men in football. The point is that you saw it. If enough people see it enough times, it stops mattering if it’s true. Call it advertising, call it propaganda—the effect is the same.

@wendyp4545 If true, this is the point where we stop pretending this is a law enforcement agency and start calling it what it is—a partisan security force. Dismantle and sell it for parts.

@JohnJHarwood At least John has given up the "journalists don't pick sides" pretense. We all knew you were a hack.

RT @ClayTravis: Crowd roars when Trump is shown during the national anthem.

@EndWokeness 'We’ve lived it.’ No, you haven’t. And the last time the U.S. government rounded people up, it was Democrats throwing American citizens into internment camps.

@libsoftiktok Someone needs to check this guy's browser history.....

@seanmdav Federal district courts weren’t designed to act as mini-Supreme Courts issuing nationwide injunctions on executive policy. But Democrats figured out they can bypass Congress, ignore elections, and let their favorite judges run the country instead.