RT @SGerwann: 🥳First paper out! Curious about integrating immersive VR and augmented virtuality in sport and performance psychology resear…

RT @ccss_uu: 📢 Next week Thu Oct 17. 12-13. Dr. Yannick Hill (@YHillSPP) will join us @ccss_uu to kick off the new theme 'Resilience'. Pl…

@sjoerdmb Source/proof: just trust me

@ND_Mendy @BuffaloBills I guess the Chiefs reviewed it and rejected it…

Our latest article on how we can translate hormesis to human performance has just been published! If you are interested in how stressors can be utilized to enhance performance, check it out: @awkiefer

@LeeuwenMoira @MAfschrift We won as a team ;)

@JBJSmeets I would probably categorize it as Simpson's paradox (for the ABC combination) and an ergodicity problem for the fact that the participants seem to change, but the group-level pattern remains robust between A and B

Spent a very productive week with @awkiefer at @UNC discussing different research projects. Thanks for the hospitality and stay tuned for the results in the near future!

@RichieGoulding1 Read a full paper just because you're interested in it and not because you were asked for peer review...

@RichieGoulding1 Congratulations, ver well-deserved! Looking forward to sharing offices for the coming years

@StuCarrington07 @barst1_paul Happy to share the two brief papers if you're interested

@DanielGucciardi To me, this is indeed one of the cores, but I am hesitant to make a firm call on the essential bits... I guess that this is one of the central avenues for the field although some colleagues may be more convinced by other approaches

@DanielGucciardi [3] However, I assume that there is large overlap with other functional adaptations like mental toughness (or resistance) and stress-related growth (or thriving)

@DanielGucciardi [2] From a dynamical systems perspective, the answer may also be that the exact components are second to the functional integration. Like in degeneracy, different elements can result in the same functional output

@DanielGucciardi [1] Excellent question that I have wondered myself. I do not think that there is a universal answer. It largely depends on what needs to "bounce back" (e.g., motivation or well-being) and what the current and past situations looked like

@DanielGucciardi I think the simplest way to look at it, is acknowledging a change over time emerging from the interaction of multiple components. Here are two recent papers where we aim to clarify this and

How can we integrate psychological and physiological variables to understand resilience in athletes? In our latest publication, we propose that dynamic network structures could provide exciting new avenues in this domain. Curious to have a quick read?