WitchCelebrity Profile Banner
Celebrity Witch-hunt Profile
Celebrity Witch-hunt

@WitchCelebrity

Followers
338
Following
55K
Statuses
27K

I enjoy engaging in art

Art Gallery, Canada
Joined November 2020
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
5 days
This house was made and placed on Monday. He was really mad but it just takes time. Today he was finally up on land again, waiting behind that rock on the top left of the pic. Next time the bag goes to the back of the house and hopefully he will get in and lie down.
Tweet media one
0
0
4
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
19 minutes
@CburgesCliff eggcentricity
0
0
0
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
52 minutes
@CburgesCliff What's the difference between a particle/wave/info that gets arbitrarily close to an event horizon and one which touches it? Won't all memory of their having gone into the hole have long vanished by the time either come out?
0
0
0
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
1 hour
@RossDynamicsLab Are these supposed to be three objects with the same mass or is the red guy a lot less massive than the other two particles?
1
0
1
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
4 hours
This game is so good πŸ₯΅Let's go Bert Zappa!
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
0
0
0
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
4 hours
Allllll for a little slice of those YT bucks amirite? 😎 (my guess is he has ~15-35 subscribers and tens of views)
1
0
1
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
4 hours
@ItsBS_YouTube LOL ok. bye dude. actual working physicists = pseudoscientist. random guy who doesn't know the diff between ordinary algebra and high level calculus has it all figured out! See you on TIME magazine, nutjob. LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Don't reply or I'll block ya.
0
0
0
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
4 hours
This man or woman imagined a dataset and then decided that Einstein was wrong because of it! It's incredible how some people need to feel important.
@ItsBS_YouTube
ItsBS - subtard
4 hours
@WitchCelebrity Re: "but if it doesn't describe reality it is incorrect." I agree. A single spherical wave becoming a 2nd spherical wave for the moving frame is crazy.
0
0
0
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
4 hours
@ItsBS_YouTube Ok and show me that study. Where's the research paper? *waits forever for a paper that doesn't exist*
1
0
0
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
4 hours
@ItsBS_YouTube You're calling me pseudoscience when if I asked 10,000 physicists from around the globe they would all say that yes c=c and no c does not ever equal c+v or c-v or anything but c in a vacuum. But I am the pseudoscientist! LOL You don't know math buddy. It's clear. I do.
1
0
0
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
4 hours
@ItsBS_YouTube What are you gonna do when you find out light spreads out not just on that surface but the same "pulses" can take wildly different paths? πŸ˜– What happens to light emitted just inside an event horizon in your wacky world, ItsBS? Lemme guess BHs don't exist!
Tweet media one
1
0
0
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
5 hours
@ItsBS_YouTube That surface of packets could fall into galaxies or black holes, whatever, but it would always "feel normal". It'd just be an EM field, rippling in a direction. It could orbit a black hole for a while and then rush off BEHIND the path of the same photon sphere. Weird stuff.
1
0
0
@WitchCelebrity
Celebrity Witch-hunt
5 hours
You're using words and reading words without actually knowing what they mean. That's why it's important to go to school so that someone can tell you when you're wrong and you have to listen or fail. I can easily see what he's talking about but you just see a word and jump on it.
1
0
1