@jeymccreight
The point, Dr McCreight, is that only two sexes have evolved. People constantly appropriate DSDs as debate tactic when, frankly, it has nothing to do with the sexes being binary.
This causes distress to many who genuinely have these conditions.
@FondOfBeetles
@SkyNews
And why is everyone so excited about parthenogenesis all of sudden - this is not new information.
Has 2SLGBTIA+ pride month sent everyone loopy?
@msdwrites
@MrMennoTweets
@NadiaWhittomeMP
Ms D, which peer reviewed systematic review did they use to inform their alleged rejection of the recommendation made by the Cass Review?
Could you provide a link, please?
@lightsaber230
@RichardDawkins
People with intersex conditions are male or female just like everyone else.
'Intersex' isn't a third sex - Professor Dawkins, didn't forget this, Jay.
@GeorgeAylett
This is a profoundly misleading and anti-scientific tweet.
The sexes are binary because only two sexes have evolved.
- Anueploidies are not sexes.
- Transgender is not a sex.
Please stop spreading misinformation.
@thornedpoems
Then you aren't qualified to make pronouncements like "there are three sexes"
Stay in school, get educated and stop spreading misinformation on social media.
@TheDJ_King
@simonjedge
@NadiaWhittomeMP
The last two aren't even peer reviewed.
None of these papers are systematic reviews.
All of them are opnion based.
Can you actually provide what I have asked for?
@stephenwhittle
@Baroness_Nichol
1. Not all species are anisogamous. That doesn't mean anisogamy didn't evolve long before humans produced words to describe it.
2. Nature doesn't 'understand' anything - but nature exists regardless of our linguistic descriptions, including males and females.
Stick to the law.
@thornedpoems
No it's not.
The primary literature (peer reviewed 'advanced' biology) is very clear there are two sexes.
I don't need information about sex development conditions. I'm not 15 and uneducated.
@thornedpoems
@mushroomfem
@Turgle_turgle_
@KayKay1134106
If there really are three sexes, would you be kind enough to detail the development stages which caused isogametic reproduction to evolve into those three sexes?
Extra points for citations from the primary literature.
@TheDJ_King
@simonjedge
@NadiaWhittomeMP
All the systematic reviews which have been published in this area have concluded the same thing - even those independent of Cass.
The opinion pieces you cite are people who have a vested interest.
You're falling for it, my little friend.
@TheBMA
@DrPhilBanfield
The BMA has every right to critically assess the methodology and recommendations of the Cass Review – but it has a responsibility to do so without political or ideological bias.
Members involved in this review need to consider that Cass is the most in depth and detailed
@RayAlexWilliams
The Foucauldian and Butlerian philosophy which all of this is based is mildly interesting from an academic point of view, but is not only easily disproved but is also completely unworkable practically in real life. 1/3
@cooperlk99
@nationalpost
People with these conditions are still male or female.
Intersex isn't a third sex. Only two sexes have evolved.
Something consisting of two things is a binary.
The sexes are binary because there are just two of them.
@thornedpoems
No, Patches, you are responding to a question I haven't asked.
I asked if you could detailed explanation of the development stages which caused isogametic reproduction to evolve into three sexes.
Can you?
@TheDJ_King
@simonjedge
@NadiaWhittomeMP
Glad you admited they aren't peer reviewed.
Dr. King - have you ever heard of the hierarchy of evidence (you're welcome to use google)?
@MsGrgaMeadows
@wesstreeting
Why would
@wesstreeting
ignore the findings of the most robust review done in this field?
Why would he also ignore:
- The Royal College of Psychiatrists
- The British Psychological Association
- The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
The time for ideology is over.
@TheDJ_King
@simonjedge
@NadiaWhittomeMP
I have read them, which is why I know that they aren't peer reviewed systematic review - which is what I asked for.
Can you provide any?
@Evolutionistrue
It is extremely disappointing to see this in Cell.
We do not need an anti-scientific opinion piece (by a historian) claiming sexes do not exist published in a leading biology journal just because someone has ED&I in their objectives.
Biology journals should be apolitical.
@deuslapis
@KaneHikaru27
@DelusionPosting
For something to have a bimodal distribution there must be far more than just two values.
Sexes are binary because only two of them evolved.
You don't know what you are talking about, I'm afraid.
@LivingXXY
This doesn't surprise me.
I have noticed over the last six months, the "TRA"
side use CAIS in arguments much more frequently.
This has now led to the "GC" side reacting.
Both are wrong.
CAIS has absolutely nothing to do with being transgender.
@TheShyWoof
@jeymccreight
People with these conditions are male or female just like everyone else.
DSD isn't a slur. Intersex conditions are a subset of DSD conditions. None of them support the notion that there are more than two sexes.
@jeymccreight
Unfortunately, the good doctor is a coward and has run away.
Sex is not bimodal. This is biologically illiterate.
PhD in genetics? Christ!
Must have bought it off ebay.
@TagWritesBooks
@stephenwhittle
Gender is a human made concept. You are referring to sexes here.
This is called sequential hermaphroditism. It is a sexual system which requires the two *sexes* (male and female).
How did they switch sexes before humans invented them...
@stephenwhittle
?
To save you from reading this article:
- Sex is culturally difficult because some men want to compete in women's sports
- Such philosophy has captured some in anthropology who believe discussing sex is transphobic
- Some species reproduce asexually 1/2
@msdwrites
@MrMennoTweets
@NadiaWhittomeMP
I take it Ms D couldn't find any peer reviewed systematic review.
Another spreader of pseudoscientific blubber calling "sealion" when asked to evidence their claims.
Not a single shred of intellectual integrity.
- Clownfish exist and they change from male to female.
- Some organisms are infertile
- Defining species can be fuzzy and difficult
- So, what is the question - we don't really know.
If you are still subscribed to SciAm, now is the time to cancel. 2/2
@deuslapis
@KaneHikaru27
@DelusionPosting
Hormones levels are not sexes.
Secondary sex characterstics are not sees.
Chromosmes are not sexes.
Primary sex characteristics are not sexes.
Like I said, you don't know what you are talking about, my friend.
Them: There are more than two sexes.
Me: How many sexes?
Them: A number between 1 and 100, idiot!
Me: Okay...but how many?
Them: Some humans have red hair, dumbass!
Me: Right...but how many sexes?
Them: I ANSWERED YOU! STOP COMMITTING TRANS GENOCIDE, SEALION!!!!!
@JasonBerger1
@garylfrancione
@lulusolomo86641
The first is an opinion piece (it is not primary literature)- the author is actually quite clear that there are only two sexes.
The second is another opinion piece, this time by a student.
I suspect you aren't versed in the primary literature of biology?
@jdcmedlock
Please can we collectively retire this ridiculous cartoon.
There is no bimodal distribution of the sexes because two, and only two, sexes have evolved. This is consistent whether you are learning basic or advanced biology.
@lundyradio
The constant abuse, appropriation and misrepresentation that anyone who has any form of DSD receives from many of the TRAs on this app is morally reprehensible.
A few swear words from you is a wholly understandable and reasonable response.
@JamesEsses
People who claim that trans women are women are unable to provide any objective definition of what a woman actually is.
They dance around semantic deconstruction and subjective self-identification ad nauseum.
Yet, they all know which parent they buy a Mother's Day card for.
@BadAtom
@jeymccreight
No, Jason, I am not.
You are confusing sexual characteristics with sexes.
Only two sexes have evolved, that makes the sexes, by definition, binary.
@NeuroSGS
Thank you Sammy and Gwen. It's very refreshing to see honest and respectful conversation on Twitter. A resolution to current social and political complexity surrounding transgenderism will only be found by such conversation.
@garylfrancione
I have never considered that this is a particularly complex point.
It amazes me how so many people are confused by anatomical variation and the sexes, conflating the former for the latter.
Ideological bias is extremely dangerous.
Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds.
@mrgrahamreed
@DocCSarah
@KatyMontgomerie
No you haven't got it.
People with sex development conditions do exist. They are male and female just like everyone else. Please stop spreading misinformation about them.
@JasonBerger1
@garylfrancione
@lulusolomo86641
The point appears to be going right over you.
Opinion pieces are not components of the primary literature, the content of them do not change the consensus of the actual research field of biology.
@spacemanfranko
@lundyradio
.
@janeclarejones
wrote an interesting article in which she traces the genealogy of the arguments used by gender ideologues regarding sex. It's all smoke and mirrors.
Absolutely worth a read.
@StateDaft
@latsot
@helenstaniland
Neither I, nor Helen, nor Iatsot have said that.
People with 'intersex' conditions are either male or female. You are completely misinformed here, I'm afraid.
@JasonBerger1
@garylfrancione
@lulusolomo86641
No Jason.
The consensus is in the primary literature of biology - these articles are not primary literature.
I could write an opinion piece tomorrow suggesting that humans haven't evolved from heidelbergensis; the consenus would still remain.
@moris_gone
@connie_war69582
@DieMadTerf
@littIe_fang
@OwOsimulator
Female was the person who was impregnated and who gave birth - this requires large gametes.
We just didn't realise it at the time.
When we discovered gametes we didn't all of a sudden change the sex of lots of females into males. This elements are all connected.
@JasonBerger1
@garylfrancione
@lulusolomo86641
The consensus of sex being binary is by research biologists in the primary literature.
Whether journalists/students/architects/waste mangers/hoteliers agree is a different issue.
@JeremyShawMD
Interesting - but whey are they referring to this person as female?
It's crucial that language conveys accuracy, particularly when reporting medical information.
@moris_gone
@connie_war69582
@DieMadTerf
@littIe_fang
@OwOsimulator
In biology we have studied and researched the the sexes for hundreds of years.
We have developed our understanding of the sexes, and as we have broken new biological frontiers this has added to our knowledge.
The categorisation is based on biological reality.
@JasonBerger1
@garylfrancione
@lulusolomo86641
No Jason.
None of them have published peer reviewed research which demonstrates sex isn't binary.
The author of your first article clearly states there are just two sexes.
The second author isn't even a research biologist!
@Naozymandias
@RayAlexWilliams
The belief that the sexes are socially or culturally constructed is what I am referring to here.
I presume I do not need to explain why this is clearly balderdash.
@moris_gone
@connie_war69582
@DieMadTerf
@littIe_fang
@OwOsimulator
You are quite correct, female is a sex and not a person.
As I have explained our understanding of the sexes has developed and been enhanced. But a female as defined 2,000 years ago is a female today - we just have a better and more detailed grasp of what that means.
@NeuroSGS
If we are to agree with the claim that trans women are real women because their neuroanatomy is typical of a "female brain" we also have to conclude that homosexual men are women.
Is this really the kind of homophobic argument these people want to make?
@lundyradio
My son was here over Christmas with his (male) fiancee.
I asked what their thoughts were about all of this queer / transgender business.
They rolled their eyes and explained their desperation for everyone to back to be normal.
@HazelAppleyard_
If I see he/him in a bio, I now assume that the person is female - I'm not sure that is what they intended when they initiated this rubbish.