😏

@mauricebilli @3AW693 “Don’t believe your lying eyes” That $1,500,000 AUD …. Seriously. How low will you take your standards for your ism

@T_DubsVIC @3AW693 Did you get a cut of the $1,500,000AUD At least don’t be a “useful idiot” …. Look up the meaning of the political term

@DrNeilStone 🤷

You mean the part were they held prisoners down or stopped people working? Like it’s literally the first and most important point 🤦🏻 Point 1: Voluntary Consent “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”

There are also mixed studies in relation to lockdowns and you ignore the known increases in suicide among young people and decades effects on the young. I get you’re part of the boomer group so the young don’t show up on your radar but 800% increase in Victoria of attempted suicide on sub 18 year olds during it…. Well like I said… your reading in a consensus echo chamber not actual science because there is much division about it in science (not to say it’s all wrong or right but…) Studies Indicating Limited Impact of Lockdowns: •A meta-analysis by Herby et al. (2022) concluded that lockdowns in Europe and the United States during the spring of 2020 had a relatively small effect on COVID-19 mortality, reducing deaths by an average of 0.2% to 2.9%. •Bjørnskov (2021) analyzed weekly mortality rates in 24 European countries and found no clear association between the severity of lockdown policies and mortality development. Studies Indicating Significant Impact of Lockdowns: •A study published in Nature reported that regions without mandatory lockdowns experienced a lower reduction in mobility and a substantial increase in mortality, suggesting that lockdowns effectively reduced COVID-19 transmission and deaths. •Research in Health Affairs highlighted that the effectiveness of lockdowns was influenced by how responsive communities were to evolving mortality risks and their willingness to adopt non-pharmaceutical interventions.

@BenFordhamLive See not all racism is bad 🤷

@SkyNewsAust There might be headwinds to any attempt by Australia 🤷

RT @LozzaFox: Why are we forced to tolerate paedophilia for fear of causing offence? The sexual exploitation of children is disgusting and…

@CilComLFC Something tells me the feminist industry will be all quiet on the western front for this one

@senatorbabet The question for Rudd is was it cash for comment?

@MathsPlusPlus @kholden @DoctorKarl The industry, the politicians, to companies, the health regulators. The list is long. What changed? Cause it wasn’t …. Science. Just the cash flow

Evidence? 36 months before Covid everyone in science agreed mRNA vaccines in multiple dosses caused toxicity and natural immunity was effective for those who had had a disease recently. This is not to bag vaccines as someone who has had dozens but please don’t pretend to quote …. “Science” when most of you couldn’t connect a BLS lab researching Coronavirus 230m away to the wet market Then Covid cash cow showed up

@TonyHWindsor Did you just call them what I think you did? …. You’re attacking them for not thinking an approved way 🤯🤦🏻

@phlogga “They’re not as 💩 as what I thought they were” When that’s your supposed celebration wow

@2nann @SatPaper Lmao - it’s proven but you don’t link then turn around and lock down your comments 🤣🤣🤣 Looks like you got fear going

@actualAlexJames It’s actually USD so it’s about $1,500,000

RT @actualAlexJames: Kevin Rudd needs to be fired ASAP. A thread 🧵

@Bowragak @BilsonhBilson