TheRefsView Profile Banner
The Ref’s View Profile
The Ref’s View

@TheRefsView

Followers
3K
Following
60
Statuses
251

Podcast with Former SFA Refs Des Roache & Steve Conroy. Sponsored by Roxburgh Group, Beeks & Exacta Concrete Flooring. Part of @SMMediaEnt podcast network.

Joined November 2024
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
12 hours
@afc1903mad @Amoruso1998 @gordonduncan7 @ClydeSSB It’s a penalty. QP Player clearly impedes the striker.
4
0
0
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
12 hours
@afc1903mad @Amoruso1998 @gordonduncan7 @ClydeSSB Is there a clip of the incident?
1
0
0
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
15 hours
So nervous, but hopefully, for once, we can do it!
Tweet media one
1
0
1
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
19 hours
For us, this is not a penalty. It’s a natural attempt to play the ball and the contact is minimal.
@PremSportsTV
Premier Sports
1 day
A controversial penalty awarded to Atletico Madrid after a VAR review 👀 The Real Madrid players and Ancelotti are in disbelief 😮
7
0
4
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
2 days
@DanGreen21 The Law is clear in this instance. It would be violent conduct if there was any form of contact beyond “negligible”. There was no obvious contact at all.
3
0
2
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
2 days
@Les_Maestro It should always be the Referee’s decision. In this instance though he advised correctly & succinctly. Unfortunately, he chose to ignore that advice.
4
0
0
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
2 days
@p_bov1 And the “panel” has been shown in great light since!
2
0
5
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
2 days
@gunnrwilson VAR cannot get involved in yellow cards, so that decision is entirely the Referee’s.
2
0
1
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
2 days
For us, Nick was given every opportunity to rectify the situation with clear advice given. He was thrown a lifeline that should’ve placed a seed of doubt in his mind over this incident. His own mind was already made up - wrongly! He dug his own grave there for himself
18
7
167
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
3 days
THE REF’S VIEW: KMI Chaos & The Two Weeks of Discontent The guys are back as they analyse the previous two weeks and assess various statements about the situation involving VAR & KMI. @des_roache @SMMediaEnt
1
1
1
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
3 days
A belated episode recorded tonight and ready to come out soon. Discussing all things controversial with the SFA over recent weeks. Be back as usual on Sunday with weekly pod and the return of our Global Holiday Ambassador 😎
0
0
9
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
7 days
@MLSMoves hi all, we are 2 Scottish ex Top Flight Referees with international experience across Europe. Love MLS football & wanting to engage with any content & issues that may arise through the season. Always open to clips & discussion. Pls feel free to include us @TheRefsView
0
0
0
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
8 days
@afc1903mad @Seanasauruss @BigBadP @ClydeSSB @ScottishFA @gordonduncan7 As we said. It was used as leverage to gain height in a natural manner. If he went with intent to contact the player with force it would be a different take. As we said, No foul. Perfectly legitimate attempt to play the ball.
3
0
1
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
8 days
@RidvanLoyal That’s a penalty. No question at all.
0
0
3
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
8 days
@afc1903mad @Seanasauruss @BigBadP @ClydeSSB @ScottishFA @gordonduncan7 It’s always good to have a debate in a healthy manner. That’s why we all love our game
0
0
3
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
8 days
@afc1903mad @Seanasauruss @BigBadP @ClydeSSB @ScottishFA @gordonduncan7 Not every physical contact is a foul
2
0
1
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
8 days
@afc1903mad @Seanasauruss @BigBadP @ClydeSSB @ScottishFA @gordonduncan7 Regarding handball - No. Arm is in a natural position while jumping. Didn’t make himself unnaturally bigger. Ball struck him.
3
0
3
@TheRefsView
The Ref’s View
8 days
Clear & obvious penalty for St.Mirren against St.Johnstone. Player clearly impedes the St.Mirren attacker and ball doesn’t deviate from its direction. Amazed VAR didn’t pick it up @sffpodcast @SJFCFANS what do you think?
2
0
2