Why Lie
@TheNewBacklash
Followers
412
Following
17K
Statuses
4K
I don't have to pretend anyone is the opposite sex in order to tolerate their existence. Why do you?
In a trailer with my pitbull
Joined June 2023
Transgenderism is a war on feminism. The Democratic Party is full of collaborators and useful idiots. 1/6
1
2
13
@eggandsperm @WingsScotland @AgpAnti So gay men, men who don’t want children, and any man who ever envies (or fetishizes) women’s reproductive power aren’t really men? 🧐
2
0
0
“Male has no definition so I can say I’m not that. Female has no definition so you cannot say I am not that.” All it ever boils down to is “because I said so,” and it only ever matters if the person saying so IS MALE.
"The term biologically male is completely nebulous and has no definition. I am biologically female", says the unambiguously male DOCTOR "Beth" Upton, astoundingly.
0
0
3
@JournalistJill @raqaellapaella They never miss an opportunity to reveal that they know FTM “transition” does not, in fact, change F to M. They always miss the opportunity to acknowledge the corollary that a man who loses his penis remains a man.
1
0
4
I would add that when Left-wing parties are not only willing to participate in but actively enforce & prioritize the obvious & absurd lie that some men are women, all leftwing positions are tainted - are they just more obvious & absurd lies, as conservatives have always claimed?
I’m often asked why, out of all the issues afflicting society, is ‘gender ideology’ the hill to die on. Because child safeguarding is the single most important duty we have as adults. If our children, on the basis of a lie, end up sterilised and mutilated, there is no future.
0
0
1
@xx_xyathletics @mann_sallyGenX Weird how it’s supposedly impossible to pin down any objective difference between men & women yet also incredibly important that we’re all clear this person is NOT a man - whatever that is, who can even say.
0
1
3
@jk_rowling Them 5 mins ago: “We must redefine the words man & woman for everyone everywhere, on behalf of a tiny fraction of the population.” Them now, when normies are finally realizing what an absurd demand this is: “OMG why do you even care about a tiny fraction of the population?”
0
0
2
@UltraNeonGote Interesting how you use quotation marks but add a word I did not use. Almost like you’re the one trying to do a number here. 🙄
1
0
1
It is not offensive to call a man a man. If this causes the man “immense distress” he should get psychiatric care in order to ACCEPT AND COPE WITH REALITY.
JR - do you accept that calling DU a man, that not a woman is likely to cause immense distress SP - when I'm in the situation, feeling intimidated and embarrassed, I needed to explain that he was a man JR - did not answer my question, is it offensive SP - it's the truth
0
5
9
"Well, if you'll pretend a woman's marital status isn't pertinent to her social status, why won't you pretend some people are the opposite sex?" All these false equivalencies accomplish is outing those who were pretending to believe in progressive politics in the first place.
what was this hysteria about pronouns? even people whom I know to be altogether reasonable seemed to resent being asked to be courteous enough to respect others' wishes in this small regard; why did it arouse such animosity? people balked at using "Ms." initially but soon adjusted. truly perplexing since, set beside the criminal enormities of the GOP, the pronoun issue was so minor as to be minuscule; yet, helped to defeat Democrats in the election.
0
1
4
@Martina @CarilynJohnson Weird how we supposedly need these terms to include “trans men” as females but we don’t need to call men sperm manufacturers or prostate havers or penis people in order to “include” trans women as males.
0
0
2
RT @TheNewBacklash: @KaeleyT I just wonder if any Leftists are catching on that his argument “if women have some biological differences to…
0
1
0
@KaeleyT I just wonder if any Leftists are catching on that his argument “if women have some biological differences to men then they must be inferior to men” is the same argument they’ve been making for rendering those differences un-nameable.
0
1
0
@KaeleyT What it boils down to: “You made us men pretend women are fully human, now we make you pretend some men are women.” As I’ve been saying for over a decade, it’s a backlash.
0
0
5
@roseveniceallan Traditional Conservative: Female means lesser. Genderists: Female means lesser, so nice people will pretend femaleness doesn’t exist. Feminists: Female does NOT mean lesser. Male is not the default & different is not deficient. TCs & genderists: BURN THE WITCHES!
0
1
4
Yes, Matt Walsh is a misogynistic ignoramus, but he does reveal how transgenderism is a backlash against feminism. “You forced men to pretend women are fully human, now we’ll force you to pretend some men are women.” This is not a shocking sentiment from an extreme social conservative. What’s shocking is how the entire establishment Left agrees with him.
0
1
6
The concept of woman as female human includes half the global & historical human population & the entire spectrum of human personality. Meanwhile the concept of a “c*s woman” or female human w/ a ladybrain, is very small indeed.
Dear TERFS... Do you really not see that denying trans women are women actually makes the concept of woman so very small? Are not your daydreams, doodles in books, smiles at that sparkly dress & all the moments of your life seen all together what makes you a woman??
1
1
5