Dr Phil McCracken
@thehonestgp
Followers
54
Following
391
Media
18
Statuses
428
I get paid to stab people with sharp objects.
Penzance, England
Joined July 2025
A summary of our analysis of the @EthicalApproach report relating to @CartlandDavid and his recent erasure from the register for harassment and dishonesty. @the_mpts @gmcuk @UKJudiciary
6
8
20
Profoundly disappointed, I find myself unable to disseminate the diurnal disinformation; however, professional obligations predominate.
0
0
5
Posted without comment.
@cogsecbrian @DebraMorganR @narindertweets I don't comment about him much. He abused me online in a disgusting way. He also abused my friend @DrRanj. He sued him, Mr Cartland apologised, paid damages, then he started up again. I understand Mr Cartland was struck off for his constant trolling, stalking and abuse. I don't
1
4
19
@DebraMorganR @narindertweets I think this ex-Dr guy would last about 30 secs in a match with Narinder
4
2
21
That's like describing Basil Fawlty as a "Leading hotel magnate"
2
7
30
Clayton says his ‘first-hand involvement’ proves regulators are corrupt but never shows the evidence. Repeated outcomes = consistent rules, not conspiracy. ‘Trust me, I’ve seen it’ isn’t proof, it’s rhetoric.
1
1
6
EAUK stitch HCID, the Coronavirus Act & Op Talla into a single ‘apparatus of capture’. Reality: HCID declass ≠ safe, CVA powers were upheld in court, and Op Talla coordinated restrictions not vaccine reports. Oversight existed throughout.
0
1
5
EAUK pit two GMC cases against each other to claim ‘political enforcement’. But GMC sanctions weigh risk, recurrence & trust in medicine not just patient complaints. False equivalence + missing context ≠ proof of capture.
0
1
8
FOI 101: ‘We don’t hold this info’ ≠ cover-up. It means the Home Office isn’t the right body. Op Talla was NPCC-led, so data sits with them & forces. National security exemptions are standard if intel is mentioned. Routine process, spun as scandal.
PUBLIC UPDATE: The Home Office has told us it holds no list of alleged crimes which police were told to decline to accept reports in respect of, pointing instead to NPCC and individual forces. At the same time, it is considering a national security exemption over #OperationTalla
1
1
12
Spot on! The Yellow Card system, born from Thalidomide’s lessons, ensures transparency in tracking mRNA vaccine safety. It’s not a gotcha, modern testing & data (e.g., MHRA, Lancet) show benefits outweigh rare risks. Time to trust the evidence!
@stuartmars38464 @thehonestgp the reason we have yellow card & more stringent approval of treatments today is due to thalidomide. It’s really not the gotcha you think it is
0
0
12
1/ Who is Dr. Aseem Malhotra? A UK cardiologist once seen as a reform advocate, he pivoted during COVID to pushing some of the most extreme claims about vaccines—claims repeatedly shown to be misleading or false. 🧵
14
54
128
Covid was declassified as HCID on 19 Mar 2020 because NHS had capacity & treatments improved. It didn’t mean ‘not serious’. Op Talla coordinated police on Covid rules not vaccines. Vaccine concerns went to MHRA Yellow Card. Emergency powers addressed transmission, not HCID status
Fact: Covid 19 was formally declassified as a High Consequence Infectious Disease on 19 March 2020. Fact: Under Operation Talla, police were instructed to reject public reports of vaccine-related concerns. Emergency powers were rolled out anyway. Something does not add up.
1
0
9
Dalgleish & Malhotra are well-known anti-mRNA campaigners, outliers, not the voice of UK doctors. MHRA, JCVI & WHO evidence shows benefit > risk. Op Talla coordinated police on Covid rules, not vaccines. Vaccine safety went through MHRA’s Yellow Card, open to all. Spin ≠ scandal
Leading UK doctors have spoken plainly: Prof. Angus Dalgleish: “This is the biggest scandal in medical history, and it has to be stopped.” Dr. Aseem Malhotra: “We must pause the mRNA vaccine rollout until independent, evidence-based inquiries are complete.” Meanwhile,
4
1
21
Reported for what exactly sir? For ‘stealing your username’? The one that was freely available because you gave it up after being struck off? Or for asking questions and stating facts and opinions, I thought you were in favour of free speech!
1
1
7
Anyone can submit evidence to Parliament it’s logged as received. That’s admin, not endorsement. EAUK frame routine process as breakthrough, but acceptance ≠ agreement. Accountability follows scrutiny, not just a PDF upload.
BREAKING UPDATE: Parliament has this afternoon formally accepted and acknowledged our submitted evidence. This marks an important step: the concerns raised are no longer outside, but inside the parliamentary process, where constitutional accountability must follow.
3
2
17
By slotting genuine council work into their series, EAUK give their conspiratorial briefings a veneer of credibility. The real picture: Essex filled national gaps under pressure. Challenges were about funding & supply chains, not capture or corruption.
1
0
3
EAUK’s Essex CC ‘exposé’ just recycles public record: £12m care fund, PPE hubs, welfare support. Framed as discovery, but it’s in ECC & NAO reports already. Spin dressed up as revelation.
In the first of this series, we examine the efforts and achievements of @Essex_CC PDF Download - https://t.co/6AOvkYC0zn
2
0
6
So, fact vs fiction: • Portrays himself = lawyer, strategist, trusted insider. • Reality = activist with no regulated legal standing. Transparency starts with honesty about who you are.
0
0
11
The misrepresentation matters: he builds weight for his claims by posing as a legal authority while attacking regulators (MHRA, GMC, SRA, MoJ) as compromised. Credibility is borrowed, not earned.
1
0
13
What is verifiable? He was a taxi driver and a Covid-era activist. He co-founded UKCitizen2021, pushing anti-vaccine and anti-government narratives. He’s not an accredited legal figure.
1
0
13
✅ SRA confirmed no record of him as a solicitor. ✅ Bar Standards Board has no listing for him as a barrister. ⚠️ So far as we can tell he’s not a regulated legal professional yet uses the label “lawyer.” 🤔
1
1
11