Having a debate with one of my friends @UkashatBalaCCII Who's based on @Aptos chain on which is fastest and here is his response after I've gives him my points, ok let's go into it let's check the similarities btw @SuiNetwork and @aptos first. Similarities Between Aptos and Sui Aptos and Sui share many similarities since both originate from the same foundational technology—Move Language, initially developed for Meta's Diem Blockchain. Here are some key similarities: 1️⃣ Move Language – Both Aptos and Sui utilize Move Language to build smart contracts with enhanced security, speed, and simplicity. 2️⃣ Parallel Execution – They both leverage parallel execution, allowing them to process transactions significantly faster than traditional blockchains, making them highly scalable. 3️⃣ High Throughput and Low Fees – Both networks can handle a high volume of transactions efficiently while keeping fees low, making them ideal for Web3 applications like DeFi and gaming. 4️⃣ Seamless Upgradability – Aptos features a modular architecture that enables smooth upgrades without disruptions. Similarly, Sui is designed with a structure that supports easy upgrades. 5️⃣ Origins in Meta’s Diem Project – Aptos and Sui were founded by former engineers from Meta’s Diem Blockchain team, meaning they share a similar vision and underlying technological approach. The key difference lies in how they process transactions: Aptos uses Block-STM, whereas Sui employs Narwhal and Tusk, which are optimized for object-centric smart contracts. Both, however, aim to enhance blockchain scalability and usability. Performance Comparison: Aptos vs. Sui 🔹 Aptos – Utilizes the Block-STM parallel execution engine, with a theoretical throughput of up to 160,000 TPS under optimal network conditions. (Source: 🔹 Sui – Implements a DAG-based architecture (Narwhal and Bullshark), with a theoretical throughput of 297,000 TPS. (Source: From a TPS perspective, Sui surpasses Aptos in transaction processing speed. Fact-Checking Some Key Claims that @UkashatBalaCCII Wrotes. ✅ Aptos’ Sub-Second Latency – Recently, Aptos celebrated achieving sub-second latency with a throughput of 20,000 TPS on a geo-distributed network with 100 validators. This represents a 40% improvement in latency, bringing it below 0.5 seconds. (Source ❌ 326 Million Transactions in a Single Day – There is no verifiable evidence confirming that Aptos has ever processed 326 million transactions in a single day. ❌ Adoption of Block-STM by Other Blockchains – While Aptos uses Block-STM, there is no confirmed proof that Polygon, Sei, Monad, or Starknet have adopted this technology. Each of these blockchains implements its own version of parallel execution. @UkashatBalaCCII Says @Aptos are the owner of Move language since they works on Diem ok let's check it out. ✅ Move Language’s Origin - Move Language was originally created for Meta’s Diem Blockchain. This is accurate. However, there's a crucial detail to clarify: Who Created Move Language? Move Language was developed by the Diem Blockchain team at Meta to enhance the security and flexibility of smart contracts. After the project was discontinued, its engineers split into different teams: 1️⃣ Aptos Founded by Mo Shaikh and @AveryChing, both former Diem engineers. They retained Move Language in its original form and enhanced it with Block-STM. 2️⃣ Sui Developed by @Mysten_Labs, another team of former Diem engineers. They modified Move Language to suit their object-centric execution model. Who Owns Move Language? ✅ Move Language was originally created by Meta for Diem. ✅ Developers from both Aptos and Sui contributed to its development while working at Meta ✅ After Meta abandoned Diem, Aptos continued using Move in its original form, while Sui modified it for their own blockchain needs. Move Language originated from Diem and both @Aptos And @SuiNetwork Dev works there.

@Draysnation Tnx bro

@Community_Sui Congratulations to them

@FA_Touadera What 😄

What's the Ticker 👀

@Sui_Bets @PlankzSui @cooItimes Let's go we're early guy's

@UkashatBalaCCII Sure bro tnx..

Just posted about @Sui_Bets yesterday at $30k MC it's now at $66k MC 1X already done even though mkt dip rn but we're holding for 100X, followed and tweet by @EmanAbio , good betting bot that you can't see unless on @Sui_Bets most importantly the Dev is based Omg 🔥🔥 LFG.

Final Thoughts Recent advancements indicate that @Aptos has now reduced its Time to Finality (TTF) to approximately 0.5 seconds, making it comparable to @SuiNetwork in transaction finality. Previously, $Sui had a slight edge with 0.5-second TTF, while $Aptos was at 0.9 seconds. However, Aptos’ latest optimizations have brought both blockchains to nearly the same level in terms of transaction speed with @SuiNetwork has an advantage through TPS.

@UkashatBalaCCII @Aptos @SuiNetwork @SuiNetwork @Aptos @EmanAbio @Mysten_Labs @AveryChing @angelodotsui @JoshuaOrhue_

@GrootKkw @SuiNSdapp @GreyonSui @alexanderbits @jay_p_sui Yea do it bro

@takoy_sasha @Aceairdrop2 Omg people's are really ungrateful

RT @Sui_Bets: @therealmrcrypto

@EmanAbio noticed....

Just posted about @Sui_Bets yesterday at $30k MC it's now at $66k MC 1X already done even though mkt dip rn but we're holding for 100X, followed and tweet by @EmanAbio , good betting bot that you can't see unless on @Sui_Bets most importantly the Dev is based Omg 🔥🔥 LFG.

@Sui_Bets @GrootKkw LFG 🔥💥💯

@Sophia_WebX Wow Got a follow from Sophia tnx ...