πΊπ² Gunner πΊπ²π«‘
@Steve1055K
Followers
7K
Following
25K
Statuses
14K
#Dilley300 Retired US Army trying to enjoy life. Alt account @Mistic_75 π
Midwest
Joined December 2022
RT @WarlordDilley: You can't show American tax payers hundreds of billions of dollars in fraud, theft, and waste of their tax dollars, andβ¦
0
6K
0
RT @Real_RobN: And this is, Daniel Fitzgerald, a State Department Official responsible for allocating U.S. foreign aid across the Westernβ¦
0
2K
0
@FreeMattKim You come on my feed kinda spotty. Going to switch to all Post and see what happens. I hope you're not being shadow banned in some way.
0
0
0
RT @FreeMattKim: As of writing of this post, I have 170k+ followers and it has been shared 1.1k times. But only 48k views. Why are they sβ¦
0
273
0
ππ»ππ»ππ»ππ»
President Trump Signed an EO to Protect 2A Rights π¦
Orders DOJ to review '21-'25 actions that may infringe on 2A rights π¦
Directs a plan to safeguard lawful gun ownership π¦
Investigates agency overreach, firearm rules & enforcement policies SHALL NOT BE INFRINGEDπΊπΈ
0
0
1
Why Are Democrats Attacking Elon Musk Instead of Tackling the Waste He's Exposing? Elon Musk, through his role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has been spotlighting what many see as egregious government waste. Instead of celebrating these efforts to streamline and save taxpayer dollars, the response from some Democrats has been one of attack rather than collaboration. Here's why this might be happening: Political Optics: Musk's high-profile involvement with the Trump administration makes him a convenient target for Democrats to rally their base. By attacking Musk, they can frame the narrative around billionaire influence in politics rather than the actual findings of waste. Policy and Ideology: The programs Musk is targeting for cuts often align with Democratic priorities, like social justice initiatives overseas or diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. Criticizing Musk could be a way to defend these policies without directly addressing the inefficiency critique. Control and Power: Musk's actions are bypassing traditional bureaucratic processes, which could be seen as an overreach by an unelected individual. This might be interpreted by some as an assault on government's established mechanisms, leading to defensive reactions from those who see their power or influence being curtailed. Fear of Precedent: If Musk succeeds in cutting waste, it sets a precedent for future administrations to do the same, potentially dismantling parts of government that Democrats have built or supported. This fear could drive a defensive posture against Musk's initiatives. Personal and Political History: Musk's shift from a Democrat supporter to a visible ally of Trump has likely soured relationships. His vocal criticisms and actions against policies once supported by Democrats might be seen as betrayal or opportunism, fueling personal animosity. Media and Public Perception: The media coverage of Musk tends to be polarized, influencing public perception. Democrats might be reacting to a narrative where Musk is portrayed as a villain by some media outlets, making it politically expedient to align with this portrayal. However, this focus on Musk detracts from the real issue at hand: Wasteful Spending: Musk's findings reveal billions in potential savings, suggesting that there's a significant opportunity for both parties to work together to enhance government efficiency. Instead of attacking the messenger, shouldn't we be asking why this waste was allowed to persist and how we can prevent it in the future? Bipartisan Opportunity: With government waste being a non-partisan issue at its core, there's room for Democrats to engage constructively. By working with Musk or proposing their own solutions, they could show leadership in fiscal responsibility. Voter Sentiment: Many Americans, including some Democrats, support Musk's efforts to cut waste. Ignoring this could alienate voters who prioritize efficient government spending over political games. In conclusion, while the political theater around Musk makes for engaging headlines, the real story should be about how we can all benefit from a more efficient government. Democrats have a chance to lead by example, focusing on the substance of these findings rather than the person uncovering them. It's time for real action on government waste, not just political posturing.
0
0
0