Shaman
@Shamanic76
Followers
114
Following
50K
Statuses
8K
@NoKingCharlie I won't get to worked up about it, if I were you. It's the type of protest that you'd miss if you blink.
0
0
0
@wardy2104 @ITV @WeAreInvictus @InvictusGames25 @ITVX ITV has actually kept to the agreement they made with the Invictus Games Foundation, which was to show 9 daily highlight shows. You can watch them by using the link below.
0
0
1
@NoKingCharlie @BAFTA @LSA Idiot. That's how a camera dolly works, or didn't you notice the track the camera is mounted on?
0
0
5
@Sandram62573987 @Pottypopo @RepublicStaff Then it's a good job we don't give them £500 million then, isn't it.
0
0
0
@BearsMadre @RoyalSussex_ @YouTube That's what was agreed with the Invictus Games Foundation. They didn't have to accept that if they didn't want to, but they did. If you don't like it then take it up with them.
0
0
0
@JayStuartWilt Then you're not lookin in the right place. They agreed to show daily highlights, and that's exactly what they're showing.
0
0
0
@aline1951_ @Qiyyah18 @RoyalSussex_ @YouTube The deal ITV has is to show daily highlights of the Games, as stated on the Invictus Games website. And guess what, that's exactly what they're doing. So please explain how William is supposedly preventing the Games from being covered, as was claimed.
0
0
0
@JoanCla94621692 @Qiyyah18 @RoyalSussex_ @YouTube The Invictus Games website states quite clearly that ITVx will be showing highlights from each day of the Games in the UK. And if you look at the ITVx website, you'll see that is exactly what they're showing. So please explain how William is stopping coverage of the Games.
0
0
0
@pussseycat @RoyalSussex_ @YouTube Why? If you check the Invictus Games website, it says that ITVx will be showing 9 days of highlights, and they currently have 4 days available. Seems like they're doing what they said they do.
1
0
2
@Qiyyah18 @RoyalSussex_ @YouTube You have no idea what the King does to support veterans - the Invictus Games isn't the only way of supporting veterans.. William has no control over what the media shows in the UK, but you obviously don't care about the truth just as long as you can attack the Royal Family.
2
0
4
@Matthewtravis08 I'm curious, does the President actually have the power to "freeze" a federal law that was passed by Congress simply by issuing an Executive Order?
0
0
1
@MaggieMobrules You mean you don't believe the story that she left, as planned, to go and br with the children? I mean, it's not as if she's done so before, and has previously been happy to spend weeks away from them, so why would anyone really believe that's the reason now?
0
0
1
@reformexposed Yet people keep telling me that the country wants Farage to be Prime Minister. Just goes to show how much of an echo chamber this site has become.
0
0
2
@mom_mombie @nomoremonarchs Why? There's no actual basis for this claim at all, nor do they even offer any evidence as to the veracity of the claim, so why do you assume that it's true?
0
0
0
@cmerry @RB1649 @Telegraph What a surprise. Someone else who is happy to make accusations, but when asked for proof resorts to blocking people. Oh, and the Accounts for the Royal Foundation are publicly available for anyone to read, and shows what that money was spent on.
0
0
0
@AnnonymousAm @toptraveller @Aichmophobial7 Why don't you ask the government why they don't fund Air Ambulances, as that's a decision for them, and has absolutely nothing to do with the monarchy. And the helicopters for the Royal Family were paid for through the Sovereign Grant, so it isn't really costing us anything.
0
0
0
@Konverter22 @Aichmophobial7 Do you even know, or care, why Sophia of Hanover was chosen to succeed Queen Anne? She was chosen because she was also the granddaughter of King James VI & I, through his daughter Elizabeth Stuart. So she was actually a descendant of English & Scottish Kings.
0
0
0