Bears and Bulls go hopeful into 2025, but what does the situation look like in the oil markets? This 2025 Oil Outlook covers topics from China, OPEC+ to Iranian sanctions and specific energy stocks. This will be essential for 2025. Enjoy! LINK IN BIO 🔗 🗞️ #OOTT #COM $CL $PBR

@boronat_carles Sure. $824 million/40.4k (33.2k from Colombia and 7.2k from Argentina) = $20.4k per flowing barrel

@luke_skiba Hahaha

With Chinese tech flying, one has to wonder if the fundamentals have changed. Everyone screaming CCP at the bottom before jumping back in after stocks rally 40%. $BABA $BIDU $BYD

Trump has a conflict with South Africa. $SBSW in the green.

Trump puts tariffs on steel and aluminum. $GGB +5% today. This was all part of my thesis. The mistake I made was to think that the market would react sooner.

@Capivaranab3 @juanito_mexok

@luke_skiba Nie ma sprawy

RT @luke_skiba: 1.🧵GEOPARK 🇨🇴 - stabilność i łupkowa szansa w Argentynie? Wpisy o Exxon Mobil i Var Energi spotkały się z niezłym odbior…

@luke_skiba Podoba mi się ten format ;)

@luke_skiba W listopadzie produkcja wynosiła już 7200 boe ;)

@EmbitteredThe Your call for worker ownership is a straw man. Poland was defined by state ownership and centralized planning, not by direct worker control. History is clear on this — it was state socialism. There’s no need to waste time further if we can’t agree on the historical facts.

@EmbitteredThe Poland was built on state ownership, centralized planning, and the eradication of a capitalist class — the very definition of socialism. There’s no need to waste further time, it’s clear we won’t agree on these historical realities.

@EmbitteredThe So now you need Hayek, an anti-socialist, to define socialism for you? That’s desperate. Poland had nationalized industry, central planning, and no capitalist class. That’s socialism by structure. You can ignore history all you want, but facts don’t care about ideologies.

@EmbitteredThe Dodging again. Whether planning worked or not is irrelevant. Poland had state ownership, central planning, and no capitalist class. That’s socialism. The USSR, China, Cuba, and Poland all used this model. If they weren’t socialist, what were they?

@EmbitteredThe First, you admitted state ownership was seen as a way to achieve socialism. Now you’re saying it was ‘wrongly assumed’. Whether it worked or not is a separate debate. Poland was a socialist state by structure via nationalized industry & central planning.

@EmbitteredThe You just admitted that state ownership was considered a way to achieve socialism. That’s exactly what Poland had. Saying ‘most socialists rejected it’ is a claim Marx & Lenin would disagree with. Poland was a socialist state, whether you like it or not.

@EmbitteredThe Even Marx and Engels saw state control as a transitional phase toward full socialism and communism. Socialism is about collective ownership, which includes state ownership, not just worker co-ops. Poland was a state-socialist economy.

@EmbitteredThe Socialism generally involves some form of collective ownership of the means of production. In this case it was state ownership of all key industries. It’s was a state planed economy.

@EmbitteredThe It was a socialistic regime. As often times in history, socialism/communism could not be achieved without force —> regime. Nationalization of what the state deems essential is socialistic behavior. exactly this happened in agriculture, private property and companies.