@LogicalJoe @McClureShawn The link below is you saying that impossible things happening in a story are a cue to fiction You could not have been talking about anything besides miracles which means you believe miracles are impossible a priori You have bias and won't admit it

@LogicalJoe @McClureShawn They walk into the Fiction section and buy your book

@LogicalJoe @Franklin2point0 @McClureShawn ... one had to learn how to navigate the scaffolding (which is intricate and ad hoc) in order to properly understand the Bible, supposedly

@LogicalJoe @McClureShawn You would also need to show some likelihood that Luke knowingly lied or that he recorded the accounts of liars

@LogicalJoe @McClureShawn All that to say: my original statement did not use circular reasoning

@LogicalJoe @McClureShawn Ok, here it is in a proper syllogism Propositions which are confirmed by experience of many ppl are likely true That God cares and participates (C&P) in creation is confirmed by the experience of many ppl Thefore C&P is likely true

@LogicalJoe @McClureShawn ... it would follow by induction that he is reliable there too The only reason to say that Luke is suddenly unreliable when recounting a miracle which points to God (resurrection of Jesus) is to believe a priori that miracles don't happen bcz God doesn't exist

@LogicalJoe @McClureShawn ... Yet he failed to show how "true book claiming C&P + life experience verifying C&P = God is C&P" is actually not logical

@McClureShawn And where is the illogic if one trusts the Bible is true for other reasons?

RT @Acts17David: Brave women. Sexual abusers always lie and manipulate, but in the Muslim community, it's even more difficult to expose an…

RT @GigaBasedDad:

@naftalibennett Amen