SS002500SS Profile Banner
Steve So Profile
Steve So

@SS002500SS

Followers
230
Following
373
Statuses
449

Since 2020, I have been a strong advocate for human-safe 222nm Far-UVC light. I love sharing information about its benefits and innovations.

Hong Kong
Joined May 2022
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@SS002500SS
Steve So
4 days
Naomi, you are really funny! Your attempts to justify these fabrications only further expose the lack of credibility in your story. A lie, no matter how cleverly acted or rationalized, is still a lie. Instead of masking dishonesty with excuses and concocting stories, why not confront the truth for once? Your quibbling is pointless. Hold tight, there’s no need to panic. Like I said, I’m not running X/Twitter as a business like you. I’m an investor, and I invested real money in FIRSTUVC to become a shareholder. I also have my R&D team, and we hold the design and patent ownership. QUESTION: Do you own the design and patent IP for the so-called ‘Nukit Torch,’ or is it just a label you’ve slapped on an existing product? Do you see the problem here? My advice to you is simple: stop showcasing your little DIY projects as if they’re groundbreaking innovations. You own nothing about the original design or any patent of the ‘Nukit Torch.’ Stop spreading misinformation and trying to justify it with baseless claims.
16
0
3
@SS002500SS
Steve So
4 days
@bornofajackall @JonKHuff @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @mfpseth @fiothenerd My intention is simply to unveil dishonesty and hypocrisy where it exists.
2
0
0
@SS002500SS
Steve So
4 days
Thanks for pointing that out. Let me clarify: I don’t treat anyone as my competitor, and I’ve never opposed Far-UVC advocates; I would fully support them. However, before endorsing any product, it’s critical to verify the claims being made. While certifications like UL, CE, and FCC are listed on her website, the real question is whether these reports can be verified. My intention here isn’t to sell anything but to ensure transparency and accountability in this industry.
3
0
1
@SS002500SS
Steve So
4 days
I’ve never opposed any Far-UVC advocates - in fact, I fully support them and their efforts. I’ve never needed to step on anyone’s shoulders to stand out, and for the record, she’s not my competitor. If raising legitimate concerns makes me ‘incompetent’ or ‘disingenuous,’ then perhaps it’s time to reevaluate what accountability means in this industry.
1
0
1
@SS002500SS
Steve So
4 days
@bornofajackall @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @mfpseth @fiothenerd Of course, she’ll never show up with those unknown reports or UL certification claims - she knows exactly what she’s done. My post isn’t about selling anything; it’s about exposing the misleading information she’s relying on. Facts matter, and people deserve to know the truth.
1
0
1
@SS002500SS
Steve So
4 days
Relax, my post has zero intention of selling anything. It’s purely to unveil misleading information for everyone’s benefit. If you’re comfortable trusting unverified claims and dismissing legitimate concerns, that’s your choice—but facts don’t lie, and neither should the products you rely on.
2
0
0
@SS002500SS
Steve So
4 days
Big red flag? The real red flag is blindly trusting a product without questioning its claims. Facts matter. If you’re okay with unknown reports and so-called certifications, that’s on you. But don’t dismiss legitimate concerns because they’re inconvenient for your narrative. I have zero intention of selling anything with this post; my goal is to unveil misleading information
1
0
1
@SS002500SS
Steve So
4 days
@mfpseth @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @fiothenerd Funny how calling out legitimate safety concerns is ‘slimeball behavior’ to you. Facts don’t change just because they’re inconvenient for your narrative. Maybe focus on the science instead of personal attacks, bro.
2
0
0
@SS002500SS
Steve So
4 days
@ParentMishmash @NukitToBeSure @SocialObGyne @mfpseth @fiothenerd Please don't just focus on the unit price only, look at the real numbers. Numbers don't lie!
2
0
1
@SS002500SS
Steve So
5 days
RT @ERGO_HealthTech: Protect your beloved with the most advanced portable UV sterilizer - X ONE Give Her/Him a meaningful protective gift…
0
14
0
@SS002500SS
Steve So
10 days
RT @ERGO_HealthTech: 2022: The year we broke boundaries. X ONE launched as a game-changer. 2023: Still the smallest, Still the best. No com…
0
2
0
@SS002500SS
Steve So
10 days
RT @ERGO_HealthTech: Since 2022, #ERGO222 X ONE has been the world’s smallest yet most powerful portable Far-UVC sterilizer in its size. Tr…
0
1
0
@SS002500SS
Steve So
10 days
RT @SS002500SS: @NukitToBeSure I strongly believe in the potential of Far-UVC technology to protect people from respiratory diseases, and I…
0
2
0
@SS002500SS
Steve So
10 days
I strongly believe in the potential of Far-UVC technology to protect people from respiratory diseases, and I welcome companies @FarUVtech that bring innovative, effective solutions to the market. However, I cannot support or respect businesses like @NukitTobeSure that mislead customers under the guise of altruism while prioritizing profits over transparency and quality. Nukit Torch positions itself as a consumer-friendly, low-cost option, but its claims don’t hold up under scrutiny. The company has provided a misleading statement that they had a UL test report and were UL certified, BUT this was simply a test report from an unknown, unverifiable company - hardly the rigorous, third-party verification consumers expect for a product in this critical field. This lack of credible, transparent testing is a major RED FLAG and undermines trust in the product. Additionally, Nukit Torch’s minimal R&D investment and reliance on white-label components suggest that the company is cutting corners to maximize margins, not to help consumers. By pricing its product significantly lower than competitors, Nukit Torch creates the illusion of affordability while potentially compromising on quality and safety - something no responsible company should do in a field as critical as disinfection technology. What’s worse is the hypocrisy of framing itself as a selfless, mission-driven company. If Nukit Torch were truly committed to helping people, it would invest in rigorous testing, transparent reporting, and high-quality manufacturing - not rely on unverified claims and questionable cost structures. Instead, it appears to be profiting by misleading customers into thinking they’re getting a premium product at a bargain price, when in reality, they may be sacrificing reliability and efficacy. I hope to see more companies enter this space with genuine integrity, transparency, and a commitment to quality. But as long as Nukit Torch continues to mislead consumers with unverifiable claims and prioritize profits over people, it does a disservice not only to its customers but to the entire industry. #FUV #FARUVC
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
2
2
3
@SS002500SS
Steve So
15 days
We have the testing report for the X ONE from Dr. Ewan Eddie, conducted in 2022. The reason we have not shared this report is that Dr. Eddie specified it was not intended for marketing purposes. We respect and uphold ethical business practices, and we recently obtained his permission to release it for clarification. This stands in contrast to individuals who exploit another person's credibility for their own gain.
0
0
0
@SS002500SS
Steve So
20 days
I genuinely hope that your 222 journey in exploring and advancing Far-UVC technology and indoor air quality is met with great success. These fields hold immense potential for improving public health and safety, and I believe that your contributions can make a significant impact. As you engage with others who share your passion, may you find valuable collaborations and insights that propel your efforts forward. Together, we can work towards creating healthier environments for everyone. Wishing you all the best on this important journey!
0
0
1
@SS002500SS
Steve So
20 days
@FarUVSterilray When lining up 150 units X ONE, it can effectively sanitize an area up to 150 meters away. Given these distinctions, I believe it is essential to consider whether this comparison is entirely fair. What do you think?
0
0
0