When the cop asks "Do you know why I pulled you over?", it might seem like you are in a conversation with a cop, but you're not. You're now testifying and what you say absolutely will be used against you. /1
Again, this is not going to get you out of a ticket. But the cop is using social conventions and politeness and respect for authority to get something from you that you do not have to give. So don't give it to them.
The best answer is something like: No sir, I do not. I checked my speedometer and I was going the speed limit, the light turned yellow too late to stop but was still yellow when I entered the intersection, I signaled to change lanes, and I came to a complete stop at the stop sign
Sometimes the cop will try to trick you and ask "Why are you in such a hurry?" This is not an invitation to give an excuse that will get you out of a ticket. It is another invitation to testify against yourself. You should answer: Golly I'm not in a hurry at all...
Another classic is, "Do you know how fast you were going?" It's not a fair question bc it's asking you to admit speeding or that you dodn't know how fast you were going. So I think you don't have to be fair in your answer. You should say "Yes, I was going the speed limit."
I don't know why you would think that (etc.). None of this is likely to get you out of a ticket, but at least you won't have to listen to the cop repeat your stupid excuse to the traffic judge.
If you find yourself experiencing schadenfreude at reports about CPAC or Air Force One, remind yourself that despite the political moment, we are all part of the same human family. Remind yourself that people said AIDS was God's judgment against gay people. Don't be like them.
MUST WATCH: Republican
@SenJohnKennedy
asks one of
@realDonaldTrump
’s US District Judge nominees basic questions of law & he can’t answer a single one. Hoo-boy.
Justice Alito on Friday: If we issue an administrative stay of the vaccine or test requirement, you're not going to accuse us of getting people killed right?
Also Justice Alito, to me:
Okay if you REALLY want me to I will critique the cover pages for all of the federal courts of appeals.
Let's start with the First Circuit. The vibe here is "It's 1984 and we have to type our opinions on pre-printed letterhead, which we can't afford to print in color." /1
This is Forrest-Marbury house, the former home of William Marbury, disappointed plaintiff in Marbury v. Madison. It was here that Geo. Washington negotiated the deal for the land that would become D.C. Oh and just to relate to current events, it's now the embassy of
#Ukraine
.
Okay so here are my thoughts on the Federalist Society. I may lose some followers but that's how it goes.
I know many of my conservative friends are members and I view that as sort of a stain on their soul. /1
I'm no expert on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, but giving the head of a foreign country $50 million to grease a deal in that country seems . . . troublesome.
BREAKING: The Trump Organization planned to give a $50 million penthouse at Trump Tower Moscow to Vladimir Putin during the 2016 campaign.
Sources say that Michael Cohen, Trump's lawyer at the time, discussed it with a rep of Putin’s press secretary
So let me get this straight. Gaetz puts a motion out there to remove McCarthy, half a dozen republicans are like YEAH WE ARE WITH YOU, and literally all the dems are like lol this will be hilarious and so it passes?
Liberals should be careful about posting their "hot takes" of this situation, lest we learn that their favorite justices are also secretly receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars from billionaire friends
NEW:
Clarence Thomas Had a Child in Private School. Harlan Crow Paid the Tuition.
The price tag could have exceeded $150,000.
w/
@js_kaplan
@Amierjeski
Here is quick a tutorial on how to use Word's TOA tool.
1. Select the first citation in your document.
2. Under the References tab there is a section called Table of Authorities, with a button called Mark Citation. Click it.
I don't think the Justices have truly grappled with how being overtly political undermines our barely-holding-it-together democracy. There have been times in our history when serious people were like "what if we just ignore what SCOTUS says?"
My best day as an attorney was when the FTC sent millions of dollars of refund checks to thousands of consumers in a case I handled on appeal. The checks had the case name on it so when people googled it they found our brief and my phone number. /1
OH HEY I forgot to remind you that yesterday was the 140th anniversary of the oral argument in Kaiser v. Stickney (1880), when Belva Lockwood became the first woman to argue in the Supreme Court.
Rules
1. Always read the local rules.
2. ALWAYS READ THE LOCAL RULES.
3. Grant reasonable extensions; ask only for reasonable extensions.
4. No surreplies.
5. Start from the text.
6. Don't try to hide bad facts, bad evidence, or bad precedent.
7. Use the Oxford comma.
So for anyone (else) who's wondering what the judge thinks he's doing in the Young Thug case, here's my best guess, based a little bit of research and almost no knowledge of the facts. /1
Why not just go back to the old rule where if you want to filibuster you have to stand there and talk and your filibuster only lasts as long as you can do that?
Sotomayor sticks the landing on a rarely seen triple-nested quotation, with a degree of difficulty that would be entirely unnecessary with (cleaned up).
When citing an unpublished district court decision by case number, use the shortest form that uniquely identifies the case. Thus:
22-cv-42
Not:
1:22-CV-00042-MJB(BLT)
Also: this belongs in Bluebook Rule 10, not hidden in Rule 18.
These people, who were scammed out of thousands of dollars in a payday loan scheme, called me up to ask if the check was real and they could cash it. I got to tell them yes, yes it is. I even had a check cashing company call. It was a good day.
So let me get this straight. Biglaw lawyers think so little of their bosses and other lawyers that they presume they notice and will get upset if their email address isn't given proper respect in the to: line of an email. That's what clients are paying $1,000 an hour for?
We need more Socratic judges ordering 20-100 lawyers to be prepared for a hearing and then calling on them at random to discuss any aspect of the case.
Except in 13 years of practice, I’ve never appeared in court when I wasn’t aware well in advance that I’d be there and know precisely the case I’d be required to discuss. You want to model practice? Assign specific cases to specific students.
ADA: You can say anything in court...
Witness: I'm going to lie
ADA: oh you can say anything in court...
Witness: imma confess to the murder
ADA: but you can't say that
Rao's dissent is even worse than I've described below because it would keep Congress from investigating any illegal activity by someone who is impeachable, not just the president. Could Congress investigate sexual harassment by judges in support of judicial oversight? Nope.
Judge Rao's dissent is poorly reasoned. If this were the law, Congress could not investigate whether the President acted illegally even in support of passing legislation to stop future Presidents from doing the same thing.
For those wondering whether to produce nonprivileged materials requested in discovery that are harmful to your client's case, I am sharing my personal decision process:
1. Produce it.
One ironic thing about becoming a lawyer is that you often voluntarily give up rights you just learned about because you don't want to mess up the career you are launching. These clerks will probably cave because they don't want the Court mad at them. I hope they don't./1
@hannahdreier
@joshgerstein
@DLind
@propublica
Check out this site, where you can buy that one and also coins that say "Catchin Tonks" "Crushing Dreams Since 1924" "Grab Em by the P**** Day" "Put Illegals Back On The Run Again"
Hey, you know that thing you did a long time ago that you feel bad about? The thing you've been thinking about off and on for like 10 or 15 or 20 years? You can let it go now. You're not that person. I know bc you never did that thing again. You're forgiven. Forgive yourself.
I've heard it said that poor people shouldn't be spending money on luxury items like cellphones. I think it's clear now that those phones are a life-or-death necessity.
Cannon: There is no statutory authority to appoint the special counsel!
The statute: "The Attorney General may appoint officials ... to conduct such other investigations regarding official matters under the control of [DOJ] ... as may be
directed by the Attorney General."
How can it be a defense that the billionaire who let you ride in his private jet is your close personal friend and also a defense that you barely even know the billionaire who let you ride in his private jet?
I like this quote from Gorsuch's opinion so much I illustrated it: "This elephant has never hidden in a mousehole; it has been standing before us all along."
When writing an appellate brief, you must keep in mind your intended audience. My most important audience is always future me who has to argue the case and doesn't remember anything about it.
There is this tongue-in-cheek thing the FedSoc says about how it is a simple debating society and they don’t take any position on anything. But that’s just a cover story. They clearly have a point of view. Their position is basically pro-“conservative views.” /2