@SButera16
somewhereinthemiddle ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ’™
7 months
@RedWave_Press @krassenstein If 100 cells frozen in time, unattached to a living uterus, can be considered living children, why stop there? I think sperm should also be considered a living being and men should be held responsible for each one.
0
1
10

Replies

@krassenstein
Brian Krassenstein
7 months
Do Republicans think this is "too far"? Frozen embryos are now considered โ€œchildren,โ€ according to Alabamaโ€™s Supreme Court. What this means is that if couples are seeking to get pregnant via IVF, the clinics which dispose of unviable embryos or extra embryos could be liable inโ€ฆ
1K
315
2K
@RedWave_Press
RedWave Press
7 months
@krassenstein That is the most ridiculous thing you have ever said. I believe in Jesus and the Bible and that's how I live my life. Just because it was written a long time ago doesn't mean it doesn't apply to us today. You are just mad that Alabama wants to protect innocent babies instead ofโ€ฆ
227
9
166