@TheWapplehouse The comments here give off ignorance, and tbh it's wild how dumb you have to be to stretch things to make sense you cultists.

@TolariaEast_ This was my exact concern and thoughts especially when they outright said this list will also be an early warning system for potential bans.

RT @TolariaEast_: Perhaps I'm the mad lad but this game changer list, even in beta, seems to be more problematic the more people look into…

@protobatlunacy @xolotltolox @_Memo_4302 Also claiming that the way a large amount of us choose to enjoy commander being "antithetical to the ethos of the format" is hypocritical at its core, so really you have no legs to stand on here.

@xolotltolox @protobatlunacy @_Memo_4302 Those are literally different formats. Borderline dead formats at that. So that's a terrible argument.

@zhippyMTG @_Memo_4302 They literally stated that cards on the game changers list are also going to be cards that could potentially get banned and that list will function as an early warning system for cards to be potentially banned. So no. It's not that at all.

RT @Scholf_A_Loaf: She did this just in time for me to paint her on the side of my B-52 as we go to fight the Nazis again

@GavinVerhey I wish instead of "game changers" we had "playable in cedh" so our good cards aren't always on the chopping block because of casuals. I would like some safety in the format I love. And some cards to be unbanned in cedh as well. Give an actual distinction between bracket 4 and 5.

@PWPMtG I wish instead of "game changers" we had "playable in cedh" so our good cards aren't always on the chopping block because of casuals. I would like some safety in the format I love. And some cards to be unbanned in cedh as well. Give an actual distinction between bracket 4 and 5.

RT @DisavowTrump20: Anyone else notice that black women with Harvard degrees and 20 years of experience are called “DEI” hires but some ran…

@StarCityGames I wish instead of "game changers" we had "playable in cedh" so our good cards aren't always on the chopping block because of casuals. I would like some safety in the format I love. And some cards to be unbanned in cedh as well. Give an actual distinction between bracket 4 and 5.

@wachelreeks I wish instead of "game changers" we had "playable in cedh" so our good cards aren't always on the chopping block because of casuals. I would like some safety in the format I love. And some cards to be unbanned in cedh as well. Give an actual distinction between bracket 4 and 5.

@playtowinmtg I wish instead of "game changers" we had "playable in cedh" so our good cards aren't always on the chopping block because of casuals. I would like some safety in the format I love. And some cards to be unbanned in cedh as well. Give an actual distinction between brackets 4 and 5.

@wachelreeks @lotoftoast Watch me food chain combo in a token based strategy that is technically more than 2 cards.

@JoshLeeKwai Also shock lands fetch lands and true duals don't have any type of bracket restrictions which makes no sense. Now a bracket 1 mana base can be better than a precon (bracket 2) which makes no sense. As well as land and creature tutors being treated differently is annoying too

@JoshLeeKwai I wish instead of "game changers" we had "playable in cedh" so our good cards aren't always on the chopping block because of casuals. I would like some safety in the format I love. And some cards to be unbanned in cedh as well. Give an actual distinction between bracket 4 and 5.

@xolotltolox @_Memo_4302 This is such a funny take, that I know is bred out of ignorance and nothing else. So please explain how it's a "clown format"? Mr furry anime profile pic guy?

@PWPMtG I wish instead of "game changers" we had "playable in cedh" so our good cards aren't always on the fucking chopping block because of casuals.