@JBRBracketology Nevermind is it Drake, Nevada, nc state, and Syracuse?

@JBRBracketology That considers the entire resume** You excluded VCU���s worst data but includes UCF’s. How about Q1A wins? UCF 2 to VCU 0. (!) Q1 Ws? 3 to 1 (Dayton barely qualifies). Q3 Ws? 5 to 3 (UCF has 2 close to 160). Q4 Ls? 0 to 1. (!) SOS? 17 to 108. (!) Resume avg? 52 to 54.6.

@T3Bracketology @MaxSummers20430 It’s been tough for UCF. All year without their best player, Sellers. And three heartbreaking losses (LSU 3ot after up 20; Houston by 1 at last second; Kansas on road in a game officiating dictated Kansas taking lead). Figure if they get 1 of those latter 2 they’re on right side

@DaveWainwright_ @T3Bracketology Both have 0 quad 1A wins, and neither have more than 1 quad 1 win. VCU’s 1 quad 1 is to 75 net. Too many other teams have not just multiple quad 1 wins, but multiple quad 1A wins. Both have bad SOS and VCU has. Quad 4 loss.

@T3Bracketology @MaxSummers20430 Would you say UCF needs to go 6-2 reg season? Maybe 5-3 if one of the wins is over ISU or WVU?

@MaxSummers20430 @T3Bracketology UCF’s wins are 1000x better than Cinci’s. UCF has two quad 1A wins, and 3 overall, something cinci can’t say. Also the loss to LSU was in 3ot and UCF blew a 20 point lead, it was also neutral and quad 2. Cinci also has way worse SOS and NCSOS. UCF in conf sched also much harder.

@T3Bracketology I think that’s the right call.

@T3Bracketology Crazy that all the bubble teams bad in their own way. Prob have to go Texas or Ark at this point. What two do you have before last two out?

@Joel_Lieberman @JBRBracketology I feel like Gonzaga is a perfect example of why predictives shouldn’t be considered in selection at all. And even KenPom and Torvick agree. It should be purely seeding. Gonzaga should be a 10 at best. They live off the Baylor game and blowing out bad teams.

@CPN12321 @ESPNLunardi Xavier, Pittsburgh, and SMU over UCF is absurd and cannot be defended

@brosciencetrade @ryanhammer09 Agreed completely. Wake and Vandy highly overrated in this Bracketology.

@MBBracketology Ok thanks. But just to be clear: Do u like X’s 2pt road W v #19 Marquette & 3pt W v #31 UConn better than UCF’s 6pt road W at #7 Texas Tech & 3pt W v #13 A&M? & USCs Ws v #14 Illini & #21 MSU too? I cld maybe see it w X bcuz of q2 but USC is 2-1 in Q3 &its SOS is 30 spots worse

@MDKnight2016 @austin_ambler KPI, SOR, and WAB

@austin_ambler Btw I think having BYU is totally justified I just think it’s close. Hypothetical, if all things remained the same but Baylor was not a q1 win for BYU, so instead they were 1-5 in q1 and 4-2 in q2, would that make a difference to you?

@austin_ambler BYU has a 31 NET lead yes but they dont have resume avg lead. UCF’s is 4 better. & it isnt just the 1 addtl Q1 W it’s that + UCF having 2 Q1A Ws to BYUs ZERO. BYU best W is home v 27 Baylor - UCFs is road v 7 TT & 13 A&M. Then UCF SOS is 50 (!) better. Shld make it razor thin.