@DOGE, a single district judge has issued a ruling blocking the executive branch from access to Treasury data. There’s a simple fix: DOJ should demand injunction bonds. 1/

@richmomz @DOGE Exactly, the law already requires that the bond be in an amount sufficient to compensate the wrongfully enjoined party. 10K is way too low. That’s what has to be fought and it is an easy case to make. We don’t need more laws. We need to force them to follow the existing law.

@Daniel_Foster_x @DOGE Right but the law also requires that the amount be sufficient to compensate for the injury. 10K is way too low. An amount “proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained.”

@stevearkwright Right. But likelihood of success is not a factor. What matters is the damage. And that’s a lot more than 10K.

@dbg8492 @DOGE Exactly. $10k is a joke. Bond is supposed to be in an amount “proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party.” DOGE is finding tens of millions in waste and fraud a day and this injunction is blocking them from looking

@FerrariVic75 @DOGE Right. Or just the parties before the court.

@726Lisa @bbrookingc @DOGE No downside. They just get their bond money back bc they won and were proved “right”

@bbrookingc @DOGE That’s the thing. The government doesn’t seek them. Hasn’t for years. In fact there’s a law review article from years back where this activist frets that injunction bonds will kill activist litigation. Turns out he didn’t have to worry!

I’ll be writing more on this so stay tuned. 10/

@RubinReport Just make sure you’re on time for the interview so you’re not en retard!

@elonmusk What will the immigration policy be?

Biden did more to save murderers than hostages