@RavenNerd2 @BrianM13912759 @woodfaman @droid1963 @TheTyrantsFoe @DefiantLs They’re black and scary?

@BrianM13912759 @Yordanarchist @woodfaman @droid1963 @TheTyrantsFoe @DefiantLs They were progressive, not gullible

@BrianM13912759 @RavenNerd2 @woodfaman @droid1963 @TheTyrantsFoe @DefiantLs Wait, there are states that don’t require a government issued permit….to exercise an inalienable, constitutional right?!

@BrianM13912759 @RavenNerd2 @woodfaman @droid1963 @TheTyrantsFoe @DefiantLs How many kids were killed at Columbine? All of these were large casualty mass shootings, done with garden variety guns like handguns and shotguns.

@barflys59 @BaronHarkonnen0 @currermell Well, your opinion is not based in any historical evidence or legal precedent. Nunn v. Georgia, 1846:

@BrianM13912759 @Yordanarchist @woodfaman @droid1963 @TheTyrantsFoe @DefiantLs Technically, yes. The 2A is not about going duck hunting. In the revolutionary war civilians had the same, or better, weapons than the military. People privately owned warships with canons on them

@BrianM13912759 @RavenNerd2 @woodfaman @droid1963 @TheTyrantsFoe @DefiantLs Even though it’s been on the civilian market since 1963, Websters Dictionary didn’t change the definition of it to “assault weapon” until 2017, after being pressured by gun control groups. REAL assault weapons are full auto. P.S. the 2A is literally about “weapons of war”

@barflys59 @BaronHarkonnen0 @currermell Nobody in history has ever had to prove they were in a militia to have a gun. The militia clause is a justification for an armed population, not a prerequisite to exercising your right

@BrianM13912759 @Yordanarchist @woodfaman @droid1963 @TheTyrantsFoe @DefiantLs Getting vetted to exercise a constitutional right….

@BrianM13912759 @woodfaman @droid1963 @TheTyrantsFoe @DefiantLs What you call “assault weapons” are the most commonly owned guns. You’re talking about banning the most common guns. .50 cals are only banned in certain states…even though there’s not 1 recorded crime with one. Thanks for proving how ignorant anti-gunners are

@redcarmusic1 The purpose of the militia is to bolster any armed forces, if needed, and to be a counterbalance to any armed forces, if needed.

@kenklippenstein The messaging was fine… …we just don’t like the message.

@smilingCatassin @charliekirk11 You’ve truly made my day, with your ridiculous outbursts

@smilingCatassin @charliekirk11

@Mdanielsrechts @Hispani28178017 @TheOnlyEsta So, when you try use the “well regulated militia” as a “gotcha”, what you’re really saying is “I’m ignorant of early American history, and don’t understand the Bill of Rights”. You really stepped in it, boy

@smilingCatassin @charliekirk11 Hahaha! P.S. bump stocks aren’t guns, they’re parts. Lmao…talk about ignorant. You don’t even fully understand what you’re screaming about.