Here I go. Someone posted data from an FOI request showing significantly increased applications from IMGs. My first problem with the data is how does this translate to IMGs successfully getting a training post? The mere fact that the poster avoided posting things shows that it does not align with their stand as it IMGs have truly taken up much more training posts at the rate the increased number of applicants shows, then that data would have been the major data rather than blanket application numbers. In this post I will prove with data that infact UKMGs are significantly advantaged and indeed they have been more favoured when competition ratios are higher. I will be comparing percentages of total applicants that are UKMGs, EUMGs and Non-EUIMGs with percentage of total successful candidates(i.e accepted a training post). I have analysed EUMGs and Non-EU IMGS for ease of analyses as their numbers are quite small and zero for many specialties. Also, as per the data obtained on HEE website, there is no exact number when candidates that applied or are successful is < 5, so I have put these as zero.

I still remember how livid I was when I read the book, how can all the animals watch this happen. I am however relieved it is just a ficiton, definitely can't happen in real life, especially this day and age. The pigs will be quickly impeached.

Some are trying to sell the BMA policy as "protectionlism", how does it protect a UK citizen who studied outside the UK? Anyone care to explain or these set of UK citizens don't matter?

@DrDisceptator @ThePinkDoctor1

@DrDisceptator @ThePinkDoctor1 You definitely have a "real" twitter account but you created this 3 months ago for your sinister reasons.If you are throwing stones behind the shadows, you are not worth my attention. I can take a good guess who you truly are...coward

@DrDisceptator @ThePinkDoctor1 It is my policy to only engage with people who have a name and a face. You faceless lots are being mischievious threatening people who GMC and sending emails to their employers. If you really want to do that, do it with your full name and face, let's knoe you

@DrDisceptator @ThePinkDoctor1 You have warped moral standards if you think this way.Pointless to argue with people like you

@catiwat @Microbedoc2 @ExplosiveEnema2 @DrLukeCraddock @med_meth @DrMohitBhagia @TheBMA @BMAResidents Australia has 31% IMGS, the UK has 40%.

@catiwat @PedroOscarRCun1 @Microbedoc2 @ExplosiveEnema2 @DrLukeCraddock @med_meth @DrMohitBhagia @TheBMA @BMAResidents You're putting a lot of untrue statements in your arguments. Australia has 31% IMGS, the UK has 40%.

@med_meth @Janeajnet @ExplosiveEnema2 @DrLukeCraddock @DrMohitBhagia Obviously, the fellow is confused

@Microbedoc2 @catiwat @ExplosiveEnema2 @DrLukeCraddock @med_meth @DrMohitBhagia @TheBMA @BMAResidents You all keep repeating the lie of most countries, I have offered the challenge which no one has taken, mention one country in the world that relies on IMGs to run their health system the way the UK does

@Janeajnet @ExplosiveEnema2 @DrLukeCraddock @med_meth @DrMohitBhagia Seems you're lost, you are saying what no one said

@Janeajnet @ExplosiveEnema2 @DrLukeCraddock @med_meth @DrMohitBhagia Another lie, however you can prove ne wrong. Mention one single country that relies on IMGs to run their health system the way the UK does.If you cannot, you're pointless