@DPGBehler You jus dont understand Calvinist theology is rigid, provisionists falsely claim it to be gnostic “those who are to be saved are saved by a special grace, and that the rest of mankind, being ignorant of this grace, remain in ignorance and perish in their sins.”

@deguido_d63717 Am I understanding your theology correctly? those who are to be saved are saved by a special grace, and that the rest of mankind, being ignorant of this grace, remain in ignorance and perish in their sins.

@zacharydparks Is this a better articulation? I wanna make sure I dont misrepresent the doctrine those who are to be saved are saved by a special grace, and that the rest of mankind, being ignorant of this grace, remain in ignorance and perish in their sins.

@ronhenzel Is this a proper understanding, I am tryna figure this all out those who are to be saved are saved by a special grace, and that the rest of mankind, being ignorant of this grace, remain in ignorance and perish in their sins. Is this good?

@Freegracec @ShawnRevReads Can you send me the books you used against the Calvinists? I really am curious about the parrallels lol

@Just4Tweets1986 @haymes_joshua I needed this word today, thank you brother

@ProvisionistP Ask the Hebrews, who had a relationship with God in covenant for centuries before us westeners, and didnt believe God determined all things If you ask me our disconnection from the OT is one of the biggest problems, Romans 9 is a key example

@immrbloo @ProvisionistP If the only thing thar will separate you from the free willers is God, what good it is arguing with us, pray abt it Or dont, it really dosent matter because you cant change Gods mind(when the Bible says he does it dont mean it) Gods getting maximal glory from us free willers

@Anon__Christian So God is the author of evil and sin, good to know

@Anon__Christian Verse 38 John 10:38 (KJV) But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works: that ye may know, and believe, that the Father [is] in me, and I in him. 🤔 Jesus gives the non sheep an option to believe😟That wasnt in my king Calvin version

@JayTibbs23 That makes so much more sense then what they tried to tell me lol

@ArthurMooreIV @SuperMatt0001 @thechurchsplit @The_Idol_Killer I’ll def read it but I dont think I can respond to all of it, this thread would stretch the earth, but I’ll take into account those points brother, like I said feel free to dm me anytime man

@patti_tilton @control_christ It was great to see you pop in, we’ll have to have another call at some point, you’re much smarter than I, would love to hear your points and perspective, God bless!

@ArthurMooreIV @SuperMatt0001 @thechurchsplit @The_Idol_Killer Amen bro, its enjoyable to talk to you, cause yeah I’m no provisionist lol Also sorry bro I know you sent me like 20 messages I cant respond to allat😂 I was just on call with a Calvinist having a great talk If u’d like to continue jus dm or we can start a chat call smtime

@ArthurMooreIV @SuperMatt0001 @thechurchsplit @The_Idol_Killer Agreed, the crucifixion of His son was the destination God pre planned, not all the sinful actions between it😂Gods purpose was not the evil of the cross but the redemption that would come from it, that much is obvious, Acts 2:23 also shows God didnt decree the evil actions

@ArthurMooreIV @SuperMatt0001 @thechurchsplit @The_Idol_Killer Further equating physical birth to spirit birth is stupid, do you think we have to wait 9 months before getting regenerated? You cant apply biblical analogies outside their scope God controls the new birth and gives it to those who believe, its so simple

@ArthurMooreIV @SuperMatt0001 @thechurchsplit @The_Idol_Killer Lol, yeah, the ‘will of man’ is not ‘choice’ in context its the will of people having natural birth, the point Johns making is the new birth is not like natural birth(of blood or flesh or people procreating) it is clear its given to those who recieve him(John 1:12)

@subq What, isnt your whole post, *hair flip* “this guy really things Charles Spurgeon, wow” or was it just stating what he said, in which case ok? Then I dont understand what your point was

@subq Ouch, a little combative, I was jus saying Spurgeon aint a perfect guy, no need to prop him up and get shocked incredulity when someone calls him foolish or wrong, as if that just shuts the argument down, its like yeah, he was wrong😂