why do so many Maga look stupid? Dietrich Bonhoeffer has the answer. He devised a theory of stupidity and says that " every strong upsurge of power in the public sphere, be it of a political or of a religious nature, infects a large part of humankind with stupidity...The power of the one needs the stupidity of the other."

@CapperOfficial @BradleyJuma11 @RpsAgainstTrump Dudayev, the first President of the Independent Chechnya, had warned of the danger for Ukraine in 1995. He was assassinated in january 1996. Chechnya has experienced the same fate that Ukraine will experience.

RT @BradleyJuma11: @RpsAgainstTrump Bullshit, UKRAINE did NOT go INTO Russia to start a fucking war you lying, disingenuous piece of shit!…

RT @ShereeWokeAF: @RpsAgainstTrump

Yes. "Vladimir Putin practices the "disconcerting lie" stemming from totalitarian communism" ( Jean-Pierre Le Goff: ) War means Peace Occupation means Liberation The attacker claims to be the victim The world upside down

RT @NTenzer: The start of the beginning of a good response. But there's an absolute emergency: to urgently increase our arms production as…

RT @PiotrLmv: @AmourskyCyrille

And? Baker or the US cannot decide for all NATO countries. And Gorbatchev also doesn't decide alone. You are lazy, you should read the original document #5 "We could have discussions" Further Gorbatchev answers wisely that they must take into account the views of all concerned parties. Nothing is acted, These are only preliminary discussions for an agreement that will never be achieved.

He knew the reality, like Boris Nemtsov, Valeria Novovordskaya, Lennart Meri, Dudayev... Unfortunately today, the President of the US and his entourage seem to have their minds completely occupied by the Russian narrative. It looks like an extension of the Kremlin. I don't know if this is due to their incompetence, to laziness and cynicism, or if it is the result of the Russian Active Measures over several years. In Europe we have also many tankies and vatniks for ideological reasons and some are sustained by Russia.

Your declassified documents shows only conversations between different Western leaders and USSR leaders. And the title is clear "who to whom". Because differents interlocutors launch the idea, make proposals (we should, we must, we believe that..) The Westerners repeat that they want to take into account the interests of the Soviet side and later they will even propose to join NATO. Everyone talks about thinking about it, discussing it, finding good resolutions. At no time has this been formalized and there has been no concerted commitment by NATO members. The end of the USSR then changed the situation.

RT @iamlouay: @AmourskyCyrille La colère est à la hauteur de la trahison, l'occident ne mérite que le chaos. L'Histoire se répète, les vict…

RT @Brif83: @AmourskyCyrille Je ne suis pas ukrainienne mais j'ai la même colère que cette personne. Honte de nous, honte de voir que nou…

RT @AmourskyCyrille: Réaction à chaud d’une amie ukrainienne. Tout le monde est sous le choc le plus total. « Honnêtement. Ce monde mérit…

@YvesOrengo @ChristineDomken @Valouvalou1208 @KateYasmina Inutile de répondre. Je vois à quel genre de complot vous faites allusion. Et vous ne jugez pas pertinent d'aider l'Ukraine. La vieillesse est parfois un naufrage.

The only promise concerned East Germany and not Eastern Europe, and NATO respected that until Russia attacked Ukraine. This mystification is based on the inability to imagine that Europeans states have their agency independently of their allies. The Russians control their vassals, the USA can try to influence but do not decide for their allies. The US could not promise something that did not depend on them alone.

3/En plus les conneries complotistes sont souvent des mille feuilles indigestes * impossible de répondre à chaque argument ** il n'y a pas de discussion sensée avec un complotiste car son raisonnement est irréfutable. D'où l'étiquette qui dispense de s'engager dans une discussion stérile. D'autant plus que beaucoup de ces "sachants" ont une fâcheuse tendance à comprendre les choses de travers et à vous prêter des intentions.