Mutanabbi
@Mvtanabi
Followers
2
Following
23
Statuses
19
Joined February 2025
@jack71574535 Oh I mean that middle persian literature largely doesnt see him favorably. They attribute him to corrupting the avesta and destroying fire temples, etc. Not the case in NP lit
1
0
1
@jack71574535 Yes, methinks it is a case of iranian selective memory…alexander’s status comes to mind. It takes a quite different turn in new persian, in an equally distinct milieu
1
0
0
@Ostokhoni @computationmath @Jomini370 @Peter_Nimitz All of this is true. How's it feel to be intellakchually molested by such a loser?
1
0
3
@Ostokhoni @computationmath @Jomini370 @Peter_Nimitz Don't deflect LMAO. Here's the thing: don't expect me to engage with a deflecting, taqiyya poasting, aesthetic slop account whose knowledge of the polemical scene hasn't progressed since ~2016. Sit this out gramps. Call your superiors to engage w/ me. Or I can call some for you.
1
0
3
1
0
2
@computationmath @Ostokhoni @Jomini370 @Peter_Nimitz Yep, it’s a popular lie polemicists like to quote on here.
0
0
1
RT @Mvtanabi: @computationmath @Ostokhoni @Jomini370 @Peter_Nimitz This is true; the Denkard 3.80 passage in Sanjana is a well known mistra…
0
2
0
@computationmath @Ostokhoni @Jomini370 @Peter_Nimitz This is true; the Denkard 3.80 passage in Sanjana is a well known mistranslation that Parsis utilized to re-write their history. The Encyclopedia Iranica entry talks about this in some detail.
2
2
2
RT @computationmath: @Ostokhoni @Jomini370 @Peter_Nimitz That is fake. This is translation from Pahlavi to Persian of exactly this section.…
0
1
0
@CollegeBoard777 @SyroJaziran I try not to cast pearls before swine…when I eventually draft it, I will have to be careful not to give them too much information, as I dont think they can properly handle the literature on the topic
0
0
1
@SyroJaziran @CollegeBoard777 Both it seems. I’ve encountered them on persian spaces, though the laymen seem out of touch
0
0
2
@CollegeBoard777 @SyroJaziran Well if it’ll give you a good chuckle…here’s his commentary on Nietzsche’s “truth is a woman” 😂😂😂
1
0
1
@SyroJaziran @CollegeBoard777 Maybe thats an exaggeration, better way to put is is you can’t study Zoroastrianism online anywhere without encountering them
0
0
1
@CollegeBoard777 @SyroJaziran What I mean by the last part is: they seem to shy away from the historical reality of xwedodah for fanciful rw chuddery. Xwedodah-as-incest has been decisively proven by the likes of maria macuch. But they fancy it as actually having been eugenics.
Ancient and medieval Zoroastrianism is famous for the practice of "xwēdōdah," that is, close-kin or incestuous marriage. As far as I'm aware, the first documentary proof of "xwēdōdah" was recently discovered in a legal text written in Pahlavi from 8th-century Tabaristan 1/
2
0
2