![Michael Scott Moore Profile](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1448379766952894465/cIxjL9Qn_x96.jpg)
Michael Scott Moore
@MichaelSctMoore
Followers
16K
Following
37K
Statuses
30K
Internationally bestselling author of The Desert & the Sea (2018); Too Much of Nothing, a novel about LA; and Sweetness & Blood, a surf travelogue.
Joined December 2011
I had a terrific time talking with Meg Smaker, director of JIHAD REHAB, on Episode 3 of Radio Free Mike. Her Sundance-cancelled film *will* come out this year, even if she has to do something drastic. @Meighon
1
1
3
RT @Grady_Booch: @elonmusk Hey, @elonmusk! Calling them "software engineers" is like calling Hannibal Lecter "one of world's most innovati…
0
18
0
RT @Rainmaker1973: While not part of their usual behaviour, bats can swim, especially in stressful situations if the need arises. And they…
0
2K
0
I have some personal experience of Paul Engelmayer & can say he’s thoughtful and smart. 1) He did cite law, and Cotton is lying; 2) keeping people without security clearance away from this data-vacuuming operation is not “activist.”
Outrageous. Obama Judge Paul Engelmayer didn’t just bar @elonmusk and @doge from Treasury systems, he barred the Secretary of the Treasury himself. Without citing a single law or even allowing Trump admin to appear in court! This outlaw should be reversed immediately and Engelmayer should be forbidden by higher courts from ever hearing another case against the Trump admin.
0
2
14
I’m surprised this tweet dares to use the word “coup.” Talk about brazen.
LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome. Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence. The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees. This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship. While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats. Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned. This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.
1
1
3
@StanFranks3 @hairygit @sanjeevsanyal No, the main pattern is that most countries stuck behind the Iron Curtain left some of their rubble in the streets until Soviet influence collapsed in 1989. (Not enough money to rebuild.) Since then they have rebuilt some structures, including Frauenkirche in Dresden.
0
0
2
RT @AMAZlNGNATURE: This could be the world's first recorded sighting of a live adult black devil or anglerfish (Melanocetus johnsonii), a d…
0
30K
0
Obvious prediction is that a lot of money Trump wants to slash from these programs (illegally) will be steered to oligarch projects like X, which is still not profitable but wants to be a White House newsletter
Big things happened today - Rand Paul said to Abolish USAID and end all foreign aid - Donald Trump ended the USAID Website and X account - Elon Musk confirmed less than 10% of foreign aid actually goes to people in need Billionaire Dan Pena says that number is closer to 0% Billionaire Dan Pena reveals that all the money pledged to impoverished countries “gets stolen” He says the wealthiest countries get together every year, “They pledge between $100-$500 million. How much money has been given (to those in need)? $0.” “We could solve poverty in the entire world with the stroke of a pen. And you know why they don't do that in Africa, Ethiopia, wherever? Because of corruption” “it's because of the c word, corruption, but nobody talks about it. Nobody talks about it. Everybody knows it, but nobody talks about it” “Almost none of the money's gonna get down to where it belongs. Dan Pena talks about Haiti is a favorite location to steal aid money from
0
0
1
RT @pitsenberger: Good morning from Stateline, Nevada, looking west into California, c. 1930s. The agricultural inspection station is in th…
0
8
0
RT @Salma_Almidani: Never would’ve thought in 2025 I’d be avoiding American news and keeping up with Syrian news because it’s more optimist…
0
211
0