Matt Devin
@MattDevin6
Followers
705
Following
3K
Statuses
8K
Joined April 2022
@MadpunkCalls @luxdiei @cz_binance What is more insidious is a lot of these “utility” projects sell useless tokens but also raise funds from VCs for equity. So token holders end up neither as creditors or equity holders. It is biggest scam to able to raise money and be accountable to nothing.
0
0
1
@jdorman81 I always find it funny how the "fundamental guys" pretend to be the "grown ups". Yet, they have to fudge a lot of metrics to make things look rosy....
0
0
0
@MikeIppolito_ No independent user distribution = no business launching appchains = no moat in the long run.
0
0
0
@llamaonthebrink This is why I said it was super bearish for TradFi to brand ETH as “an open source app platform” before the ETF launched. You all fell for the trap because you all just want the ETF hype. Now ETH is marketed as something replaceable with no real moat…
0
0
1
@QwQiao How does that make any economic sense? Using LLMs mean you have little to no human capital moat and the output has near zero marginal cost for competitors to replicate. Who want to fund startups with no competitive advantage? It is like launching generic EVM alt L1s - down only.
0
0
0
@ralwart1 @0xJim UX should be the priority at the app layer. However, I think decentralization is important for security at the platform layer. Using Solana/early roll-ups as examples reek of selection bias. I have seen plenty of dead Polkadot para chains or Cosmos chains to understand the truth.
1
0
0
@evan_van_ness @konstant_crypto @dYdX @HyperliquidX So, which perp dex bucked against the Hyperliquid trend by staying on Ethereum? The very fact Hyperliquid is pretty centralized and runs on USDC makes me doubt these traders care about being on Ethereum.
0
0
2
@4rgon4ut_ @sassal0x A lot of that FUD was started by ETH DeFi folks. It was gaslighting the fact ppl are tired of DeFi ponzis and they wanted a big target to lay blame, i.e. the EF.
1
0
1
@udiWertheimer Maybe over time, as VC funding dries up, there will be less appetite to fund near identical projects to vampire attack existing ones. Probably then, the homogenous goods competition problem becomes less of an issue.
0
0
0