🚨🇺🇸 #AHORA | TRUMP DECRETA EL REGRESO DE LA PAJITA El presidente estadounidense firma la orden para volver a producir las pajillas de plástico para bebidas.

How will the public management system be structured to ensure that AI advancements do not disproportionately impact vulnerable populations, such as low-income communities or marginalized groups? What safeguards will be put in place to prevent the misuse of AI technologies funded by public money, ensuring they are not used to exacerbate existing social inequalities or reinforce discriminatory practices? Will there be a clear framework for public accountability and transparency in the allocation of AI funding, especially regarding potential risks to privacy, security, and personal freedoms? How will the public sector ensure that AI investments do not lead to the monopolization of the market by a few large corporations, and instead foster innovation that benefits a broad range of businesses and individuals? What steps will be taken to ensure that AI systems developed with public funding adhere to ethical guidelines that prioritize human rights and the well-being of all citizens, particularly in relation to automated decision-making processes? How will public feedback and citizen participation be incorporated into the ongoing development of AI systems, ensuring that the technology is shaped by societal needs and not solely by commercial interests? What measures will be implemented to prevent any adverse social or economic consequences, such as job loss or data exploitation, as a result of widespread AI adoption in public and private sectors? In what ways will the public management of AI investments address concerns regarding AI's potential impact on democratic processes, ensuring that AI systems do not undermine public trust or influence political decision-making unduly?