@WWE
the original world heavyweight title is not owned by WWE, meaning that anyone could use that title. WWE had to create their own twist on it, the original is still the best, but it’s definitely an upgrade over the universal title.
@ecfc0504
@SeanRossSapp
the original world heavyweight title is not owned by WWE, meaning that anyone could use that title. WWE had to create their own twist on it, the original is still the best, but it’s definitely an upgrade over the universal title.
@WWE
@TripleH
the original world heavyweight title is not owned by WWE, meaning that anyone could use that title. WWE had to create their own twist on it, the original is still the best, but it’s definitely an upgrade over the universal title.
@ANDRE3000ISGOAT
@BRWrestling
the original world heavyweight title is not owned by WWE, meaning that anyone could use that title. WWE had to create their own twist on it, the original is still the best, but it’s definitely an upgrade over the universal title.
@yourscrewup
@ecfc0504
@SeanRossSapp
yes, however the only difference between the OG and the 03 version is the small WWE logo up the top. it’s way too similar to the original. Making the logo bigger and adding side plates differentiates it enough and allows them to advertise the company.
@SeanRossSapp
the original world heavyweight title is not owned by WWE, meaning that anyone could use that title. WWE had to create their own twist on it, the original is still the best, but it’s definitely an upgrade over the universal title.
@TheBobPony
Windows Servers are not meant to be consumer facing. If anything they should just be lite versions that are stable enough to run applications and that’s it. If you’re using your server to use stuff like Copilot there’s a problem.
@WrestlingNewsCo
Undertaker but let’s not forget that Sting carried WCW. I can’t believe they didn’t have a match at Mania and they were on the same card