I am running for the Senate in Western Australia, which means anyone in WA can vote for me, and anyone across Australia can become a member. I’m not sponsored by corporations or major parties—despite being asked to join one, I said NO. If we’re serious about change in this country, we need to vote out the major parties, along with the Greens and Nationals. This fight is about standing up for the little person, not the corporate giants who run the system. Yes, it’s going to be tough because most people don’t know me yet, and let’s be honest, many voters are lazy and just pick the top line. But here’s the thing—I’m tired of politicians at the top level taking the piss out of the average Australian. It’s time we stop letting the elites dictate what’s best for the rest of us. This is about standing up for everyday Australians, not special interests. We need real change, and that starts with voting for someone who’s not afraid to challenge the status quo. Link is in the bio section.

@wack37043 “You’re right. Real history, constitutional laws, and legislation should be taught in schools starting from Year 8.”

@GlennCoope13609 Against -

Agree. Though, when teenagers and young adults step into the world in a big way, they sometimes need a little more guidance and confidence. As older adults who have moved past our 20s, we should at least offer them some support. And who knows—one day, they might even be the ones rebelling.”

@SKULLDOMLAND This is true… but it’s a big step for some teenagers and young adults until they find their voices and strength.

@Orsmmm 😂

@RHeawood28041 😂❤️🙌🏽

@TaniaLe84494434 Thank you, Tania. 🙌🏽❤️❤️

@RoyalAce888 That was crumbs... That's all she and her party believe you are entitled to know.

@1973jezza You must be blind as well. I said on several occasions I won't comply with political language.

@moff67_noel I have to say, I never believed that before until a few days ago. Nonetheless, I know now.

@1973jezza What are you, a primary school teacher? Speak like an educated adult that has something worthy to say

The idea of a "100-day promise" or "100-day agenda" is a concept often seen in American politics, particularly during the early days of a new president's term. The goal is to quickly implement significant policies or make notable progress on key issues, setting the tone for the administration and showing voters that their elected leaders are actively working on the issues they promised to address.Implementing something similar in other countries, like Australia, could have benefits, such as: Setting Clear Priorities: A defined 100-day agenda helps prioritize the most important issues that need attention right away. Building Momentum: By delivering early results, leaders can maintain public support and set a strong pace for their entire term. Holding Leaders Accountable: If politicians make specific promises for the first 100 days, it's easier for the public to hold them accountable for whether those promises are kept. Of course, it's not without challenges, such as the complexity of some issues that might take longer than 100 days to solve. But as a concept, it can help create urgency and focus.What do you think? Would the 100-day promise system work well in your country?

Governments, particularly powerful ones like the U.S., have historically gone to great lengths to justify war—sometimes without public knowledge or consent. Here are some of the common tactics used: 1. False Flags & Manufactured Justifications Governments have staged or exaggerated threats to justify military action: •Gulf of Tonkin Incident (1964) – Vietnam War •The U.S. claimed North Vietnamese boats attacked their ships. Later declassified documents suggest this was fabricated or exaggerated. •Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) – Iraq War (2003) •The U.S. claimed Saddam had WMDs. None were found, but the war went ahead. 2. Covert Operations & Regime Change Governments often secretly support coups and insurgencies to topple leaders they don’t like: •Iran (1953) – Operation Ajax •The U.S. & UK overthrew Iran’s Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh to protect oil interests. •**Chile (1973) – Pinochet

@Thecryptopunk13 You're not very good at pointing anything out.

As an independent candidate, I am not required to direct preferences— "How to Vote" card can simply suggest "Vote 1 for [Candidates Name]" and leave preferences up to the voter. However, VOTERS themselves are still required to complete all preferences on their ballot (for the House of Representatives) for their vote to count. In the Senate, they must number at least 6 boxes ABOVE the line or 12 BELOW the line—but they can let their vote exhaust after that. So, while I (the candidate) don’t have to make preference deals or direct votes elsewhere, the system still forces voters to number multiple boxes (except in some state elections like NSW).

When you think you're being humorous, you're actually part of the problem in today's politics. What exactly qualifies as 'done no wrong'? Is it ripping off the Australian public or simply not showing up for votes? That just proves how lazy and unaccountable these so-called representatives have become. But according to you, it's just a matter of choosing one evil over another for the sake of self-promotion.

There’s nothing worse than negative people who have no solutions and offer nothing but complaints.